Buffalo Killer was a self described Leftist and Green Nationalist

[Subduction Zone]

It's a false analogy.
NK has no elements of democracy.
But Nazi Germany had elements of a command economy.
It appears more socialistic than countries that fans call
"socialist", eg, Scandinavia. (I don't label them "socialist"
either.)

I understand that socialists are uncomfortable with their
kinship with Hitler. His regime wasn't pure socialism,
so they label it "capitalism". I say it's more complex.
Economy of Nazi Germany - Wikipedia
Excerpted....
Overall, according to historian Richard Overy, the Nazi war economy was a mixed economy that combined a free market with central planning; Overy describes it as being somewhere in between the command economy of the Soviet Union and the capitalist system of the United States.[11]

The Nazi government developed a partnership with leading German business interests, who supported the goals of the regime and its war effort in exchange for advantageous contracts, subsidies, and the suppression of the trade union movement.[12] Cartels and monopolies were encouraged at the expense of small businesses, even though the Nazis had received considerable electoral support from small business owners.[13]

Also within that article was a statement that private ownership was the preferred state. Even though my analogy was not perfect it still holds up.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

The level of control. It reminds me of Putin's
version of capitalism, ie, that companies must
act in a manner that pleases him, or they'll
be nationalized.
"Ownership" is all about the level of control more
than nominal title to an asset. This is illustrated
when some real estate owners sue for inverse
condemnation due to government taking property
right to the extent that the asset is unproductive.

So you are talking about control and for say an enlightenment despot, that is the government and is the community in effect, that is socialism. Basically you have made any version of government and community in to socialism.

 

[KW]

Right or left, they are a murderous shooter.
I think its sad that its being broken down to whether they were right or left.

I'm just exposing the lies the Democrats are telling to try to make this political.

Clearly this guy was nuts.

 

[KW]

I think the main objective of the OP was to "own the libs" by viciously disparaging them by any means necessary. .

I just wanted to expose the lies of Democrats trying to blame Republicans for the actions of this nut case.

It's pathetic.

 

[KW]

Didn’t the Nazis drop Socialism from their name after they gained power? (And killed all the actual socialists or the SA during the “night of the long knives.”)
I seem to vaguely recall learning that in modern history class.

No. NAZI is an abbreviation for National Socialist.

I wouldn't be surprised if you learned that in a modern history class taught by a leftist professor.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Tucker sees the border problem as the dems trying to replace the current voters to get more and more dem voters. I have never heard him say anything about replacing white voters specifically. I have never seen Tucker call for any kind of violence, only change through elections. His take is not one from a racists ideology but from an uncontrolled immigration policy. The only reason the dems like immigration is because it favors the in elections, that is his hypothesis, not that he is racist. If Tucker gets shot do you think the liberals saying how he is to blame for this shooting should be to blame? Tucker has good and bad takes but if someone is going to accuse him of causing this shooting they better have better evidence than just him saying the voters are being replaced with immigrants to increase dem voters. White replacement theory is something else based on racism and anti-Semitism.

I've seen Tucker say that Democrats are trying to replace the current electorate with new, obedient people from third world countries.

 

[KW]

I've seen Tucker say that Democrats are trying to replace the current electorate with new, obedient people from third world countries.

You don't believe that to be true?

I think it is clearly true. New immigrants vote disproportionately for Democrats.

Unfortunately for Democrats, though, hispanic Americans are turning against this destructive policy.

 

[Revoltingest]

Also within that article was a statement that private ownership was the preferred state.

A privately owned company that does government's
bidding is more efficient than government taking on
the whole task. But be aware that ownership is a
bundle of rights. And the nominal owner's ownership
is diminished as government commandeers more &
more significant rights.

Even though my analogy was not perfect it still holds up.

Nah.
N Korea has no elections.
Leadership is determined by birth succession.

 

[Revoltingest]

So you are talking about control and for say an enlightenment despot, that is the government and is the community in effect, that is socialism. Basically you have made any version of government and community in to socialism.

You ignore the vast continuum between the
extremes of minimum vs maximum control by
government over the means of production.
The level of control is the significant measure.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

You ignore the vast continuum between the
extremes of minimum vs maximum control by
government over the means of production.
The level of control is the significant measure.

So all forms of high level control is socialistic and thus kind of a form of socialism?

 

[Revoltingest]

So all forms of high level control is socialistic and thus kind of a form of socialism?

Tis a matter of degree.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Tis a matter of degree.

So all high form of government control are different degrees of socialism and there is nothing else going on? No other ideologies than socialism and your form of libertarian ideology?

 

[SkepticThinker]

You don't believe that to be true?

I think it is clearly true. New immigrants vote disproportionately for Democrats.

Unfortunately for Democrats, though, hispanic Americans are turning against this destructive policy.

No, I don't. And I think it's racist. The "third world" part reveals that.

Aren't you one of those people that is always going on about how many minorities have switched parties to vote for Trump or something? Oh and you just did it here.

 

[Revoltingest]

So all high form of government control are different degrees of socialism and there is nothing else going on? No other ideologies than socialism and your form of libertarian ideology?

I don't know how to explain it to you.

 

[KW]

Tucker sees the border problem as the dems trying to replace the current voters to get more and more dem voters. I have never heard him say anything about replacing white voters specifically. I have never seen Tucker call for any kind of violence, only change through elections. His take is not one from a racists ideology but from an uncontrolled immigration policy. The only reason the dems like immigration is because it favors the in elections, that is his hypothesis, not that he is racist. If Tucker gets shot do you think the liberals saying how he is to blame for this shooting should be to blame? Tucker has good and bad takes but if someone is going to accuse him of causing this shooting they better have better evidence than just him saying the voters are being replaced with immigrants to increase dem voters. White replacement theory is something else based on racism and anti-Semitism.

Exactly. Democrats want to make race the centerpoint of all life.

Republicans don't think race should matter.

 

[KW]

No, I don't. And I think it's racist. The "third world" part reveals that.

Aren't you one of those people that is always going on about how many minorities have switched parties to vote for Trump or something? Oh and you just did it here.

There is no race to being American.

Recent immigrants tend to vote Democrat. That's a fact you can check yourself if you doubt me.

Democrats care about gaining power(as do Republicans). They will use whatever tools they can to do this.

I guarantee you that if new immigrants tended to vote Republican then Democrats would be building a wall right now!

 

[Sand Dancer]

There is no race to being American.

Recent immigrants tend to vote Democrat. That's a fact you can check yourself if you doubt me.

Democrats care about gaining power(as do Republicans). They will use whatever tools they can to do this.

I guarantee you that if new immigrants tended to vote Republican then Democrats would be building a wall right now!

Politicians, among others, are about gaining power. Power sucks people from all walks of life into its vortex of chaos.

 

[Clizby Wampuscat]

I've seen Tucker say that Democrats are trying to replace the current electorate with new, obedient people from third world countries.

I have too. Explain how this is factually inaccurate or racist or a call for violence?

 

[fantome profane]

New immigrants vote disproportionately for Democrats.

Assuming for a moment that is true, why would it be like that?

First these immigrants you think are voting for Democrats would be legal immigrants who became citizens of the U.S. and earned the right to vote, and their vote should be respected as much as yours.

But why are they voting Democrat? If Republicans have better ideas, if the Republicans are really fighting for the little guy, for the working man and woman etc, why can’t they convince more of these legal new citizens to vote for them?

 

[SkepticThinker]

There is no race to being American.

Recent immigrants tend to vote Democrat. That's a fact you can check yourself if you doubt me.

Democrats care about gaining power(as do Republicans). They will use whatever tools they can to do this.

I guarantee you that if new immigrants tended to vote Republican then Democrats would be building a wall right now!

He didn't say "Americans," he said the "electorate" are being replaced.
There is race involved when he speaks of ""new obedient people" from "third world countries." He sure ain't talking about Sweden or Norway, is he?