Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Then why dies the evidence not support it? Like the entire book of Genesis. It mentions some real people and places, but so do Stephen King novels.I would disagree.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Then why dies the evidence not support it? Like the entire book of Genesis. It mentions some real people and places, but so do Stephen King novels.I would disagree.
Gravity plays a tremendously role in physics. Therr are no "law givers" in science.Laws of physics come from God in my view or your view, where? Who is your lawgiver?
I find it interesting that the Rainbow is considered a phenomenon. It it pretty remarkableGravity plays a tremendously role in physics. Therr are no "law givers" in science.
Laws had to come from somewhere go back to the beginning and let me know where they came from.Gravity plays a tremendously role in physics. Therr are no "law givers" in science.
It's pretty but rather unremarkable. It's nothing more than light being refracted, dispersed and reflected through certain materials, such as cut crystals and water droplets. You can make small ones with a garden hose.I find it interesting that the Rainbow is considered a phenomenon. It it pretty remarkable
According to whom? An original cause isn't nearly as important to scientists as it is theists, amd theists who posit the original cause haven't even explained why their creator must be the prime mover.Laws had to come from somewhere go back to the beginning and let me know where they came from.
There is no law giver. Things that exist have properties. Those properties describe how things interact. That is what a natural law is: a description of how things interact.Laws of physics come from God in my view or your view, where? Who is your lawgiver?
I believe this is especially true when comparative mythology demonstrates that some of the stories about Jesus are plagiarized myths adapted from Greek mythology and other pagan religions that predate both the Bible and Christianity. As I explained in other threads (such as this one), it's my opinion, based on my personal research, that the stories about Jesus were either greatly embellished and based on hearsay or copied and adapted from pagan religions that his devout followers would have been familiar with at the time. To be honest, I don't believe that the stories about him are any more credible than the stories of other demigods. Finally, I'd like to include what I wrote regarding Christians who use archaeology to justify believing that the Bible is accurate.
A lot of Christians believe that the Bible is accurate because it includes actual locations that exist today. They will use this as one of their justifications for believing that the Bible was divinely inspired by God. However, Greek mythology predates the Bible and contains references to factual places in Greece as well as references to multiple gods and goddesses. Like the Bible, which cites several factual places, Greek mythology also cites several factual locations in Greece, including Athens, Crete, Delphi, Thebes, and Mount Olympus. But I've never met a Christian who believes Zeus, Hera, Ares, and Athena (as well as the other gods and goddesses) are real deities, despite the fact that there are references to actual sites in Greece that they could visit today, just as there are actual sites referenced in the Bible that they could visit today. I've met Christians who tried to use archaeological discoveries of biblical locations to claim that the Bible is true, but the same can be done with Greek mythology. Do archaeological discoveries prove that Greek mythology is true as well?
They don’t’ come from’ since they are not physical things. Causality doesn’t apply.Laws had to come from somewhere go back to the beginning and let me know where they came from.
Those very ones you claim predicted Jesus. They are vague and, I think it is clear, misinterpreted by Christians.Would like you to actually site the vague prophecies that Christians rewrote.
Then why dies the evidence not support it? Like the entire book of Genesis. It mentions some real people and places, but so do Stephen King novels.
Refraction is a simple consequence of the laws of electromagnetism. Rainbows are a simple consequence of refraction.I find it interesting that the Rainbow is considered a phenomenon. It it pretty remarkable
According to who?No consciousness required.
The point is that we don’t trust it merely because it mentions real people. To be trustable takes far, far more.Correct, and obviously we don’t trust the history of the Spain because it mentions some real people and places. It is all a fabrication, of course.
the logic of your statement is flawed IMV
Basic philosophy. Don’t assume more than is required to explain the phenomenon.According to who?
The different color arrangements in a rainbow and not some other random orderRefraction is a simple consequence of the laws of electromagnetism. Rainbows are a simple consequence of refraction.
The same thing happens with other wave phenomena. It also happens in different parts of the spectrum. We just don’t see the results.
What, precisely, do you find so remarkable about a simple spectrum being generated?
I wouldn’t go any further if I was you either, keep it basicBasic philosophy. Don’t assume more than is required to explain the phenomenon.
They are arranged by wavelength, which is to be expected from refraction.The different color arrangements in a rainbow and not some other random order
Don’t read in more than is there. Eliminate that which explains nothing.I wouldn’t go any further if I was you either, keep it basic
Spain is a real country with a real history. Maine is a real state with a real history. It's not reflected in Stephen King novels.Correct, and obviously we don’t trust the history of the Spain because it mentions some real people and places. It is all a fabrication, of course.
the logic of your statement is flawed IMV
I agree, I do the same with Scripture. When the Scriptures make sense seek no other sense.Don’t read in more than is there.