Rayne
Meh
My post was not meant to offend, so sorry if that was the case.
You didn't offend me! I'm sorry if my post sounded offensive as well. After reading my previous post, it does seem that it needed some clarification. It's all good!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
My post was not meant to offend, so sorry if that was the case.
:yes:Yeah, proselytizing is pretty hostile to your target's faith.
Yeah, proselytizing is pretty hostile to your target's faith.
people aren't nearly as attached to their hair gel as they are their religion.If I understand what you are saying, offering an alternative religion to someone that already has a religion is being hostile to that religion. What about if someone wants me to try their hair gel when I already have one that I like? The hostility in this world is unbelievable.
people aren't nearly as attached to their hair gel as they are their religion.
Hair gel has no effect on one's relationship with God.... hair gel doesn't affect the fate of one's soul... and a person isn't put at odds with his family if he uses a different hair gel as they do. Also... nobody has a heritage directly tied to their hair gel for perhaps thousands of years.
Unless you believe that your faith is just about as important as hair gel... which would be sad for you...
unless you believe that other faiths are just about as important as hair gel, which would reflect poorly on your character as a human being.
Whether hair gel or religion is more important to a person or not the concept is the same. If I am approached by a person while I am shopping to try their new hair gel, I don't consider that hostile to my hair gel because for one, they don't know what type I use or if I even use any. What if they believe that their hair gel will keep me from going bald, it would be compassionate for them to tell me about it. Same thing with Jesus, if I believe that Jesus is the only way to Heaven, then it is compassionate for me to tell someone about him.
May parents and most of my extended family are devout Christians who are firmly convinced that I, and any other non-believers are going to Hell. They are convinced, beyond any doubt that all the Jews and Muslims are going to Hell. They are also convinced that it is their duty to go out and recruit (almost by any means necessary) others into their cause. They do not, and will not listen to factual, actual evidence that any of their various positions are incorrect.
I have little doubt that there are many similarly mindset'd Muslims in this world, just as there are tons of Christians who would fall into lockstep with my family (Sarah Palin, anyone? . . . shudder) and there are obviously many who fall into lockstep with the bin Laden's of this world.
As long as people are being told that their position is right, simply and totally because they feel it to be right, and they are convinced that their way is THE way, then religions, specifically monotheistic ones, will not get along. It is inherent in their belief structure. We are right, everyone else is wrong. We are going to Heaven, and those we dislike are going to Hell. We KNOW we are right, NOT based on any facts, or demonstrable evidence, and often times we are willing to harm others that think differently, whether they have any reason to feel the way they do or not.
As long as there are large enough groups of people who fit in with the ideas expressed by the "we" from the previous paragraph, then I fear there is absolutely no hope for religious people to get along. Basically, until people are willing and able to have the courage to admit, that there is no reason for them to believe what they do, other than hope, wish thinking, or the like, and not take it so damned seriously, then there isn't much of a chance.
That being said, if more people were to realize that factually speaking, not all religions of this world can be right . . . but in fact, they all can be wrong. . . and start living accordingly, then I don't hold out much hope for the long term happiness of our species.
B.
[H]ow do you tell which religions are of God? Is it a matter of numbers? Similar teachings?
Certain religions have discrimination embedded at their core, and it can't be gotten rid of.
Unless it's anti-gay discrimination, right?And certain religions don't, please note!
(Although I will admit that to the extent that a religion exhibits discrimination or especially hatred, that's a very good reason for seeking religion elsewhere!)
Do you understand that people of other religions are doing the same thing when they try to preach to you?
Proselytizing goes beyond discussion, it's an attempt to convert. It's saying "you're beliefs are WRONG."Yes, I understand and I am fine with it. Mormans come to my house sometimes and we talk, they tell me their beliefs and I tell them my beliefs. It's the American way to have freedom of speech and religion, I don't consider it an afront to my religion or beliefs to have someone tell me about their beliefs.
Proselytizing goes beyond discussion, it's an attempt to convert. It's saying "you're beliefs are WRONG."
I prefer freedom of religion, too. That doesn't make proselytizing polite, or non-hostile.
Way to miss the point, dude.You better call 911 next time someone tells you about Jesus then, maybe they will get arrested for being hostile to you.
I agree with what has been said above. Hoping that religions can coexist peacefully is a paradox in itself. To acknowledge another religion as viable and not try to convert the "unbeliever" (whether with violence or not) would be to deny and contradict your own.
Proselytizing is trying to convert someone to your religion or beliefs. We have that freedom in America. In some countries that is illegal but not here. I prefer to live where we have freedom of religion so I have no problem with it.