Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No, I know what happened in the Dover Trial. I know how and why the side backed by the Discovery Toot lost. In some cases for the people that was trying to introduce the lies of the Discovery Toot the judge was tempted to charge them with perjury.
stop saying i dont know science, you do not know who i am nor what i do, you are just dishonest like i see from other of your posts here at RF, and you dont know anything on dover.
evolutionnews.org
When you use known lying sources you demonstrate that you do not understand science. But we could have a discussion on it. If you did understand the concepts of science and scientific evidence Here are a couple of quick question that will show quickly if you understand the concept of scientific evidence or not.stop saying i dont know science, you do not know who i am nor what i do, you are just dishonest like i see from other of your posts here at RF, and you dont know anything on dover.
and for people here who wanna know the actual facts, i already provided the links above so here is the dover reality again:
Search Results for “dover” | Evolution News
In harmony with your questions, did bookcases evolve?
Book cases do not reproduce. Nor do they pass genetic information on to newer bookshelves. Your question is in harmony with scientifically ignorant creationist sound bites.
That was not in harmony with my question.
It sez dim humour
No, I pointed out how you foolishly used a circular argument to defend a bogus source.
I don't think the reason was to fool people.
Too bad that you are afraid to learn what is and what is not evidence. You would be able to see that the false evidence needed gets down to the molecular level. The only reasonable conclusion is that if the myths of Genesis are true then God is a liar. Just because you do not understand the concept of evidence is not an excuse that saves you from claiming that your God is a liar.
I think the reason is pretty obvious. The evidence supports the conclusions and those conclusions of science are valid.
Then what do you think the REASON was that God made things that are closely similar?
Real science is nice, I have nothing against it, because it only tells what can be observed. The problem is the people who make extraordinary claims from the scientific observations.
No, science does a lot more than simply report what is observed. Have you ever come across Newton's Laws of Motion? These do not just report what Newton saw. They are parts of a theory of mechanics, which tells us what we can expect in future observations, based on past ones.
Evolution news.stop saying i dont know science, you do not know who i am nor what i do, you are just dishonest like i see from other of your posts here at RF, and you dont know anything on dover.
and for people here who wanna know the actual facts, i already provided the links above so here is the dover reality again:
Search Results for “dover” | Evolution News
Nobody but the theists thinks highly of
The mere fact you cite that website shows you don't understand science.stop saying i dont know science, you do not know who i am nor what i do, you are just dishonest like i see from other of your posts here at RF, and you dont know anything on dover.
and for people here who wanna know the actual facts, i already provided the links above so here is the dover reality again:
Search Results for “dover” | Evolution News
I'm not sure what "real" science means or what you mean by extraordinary claims.
Real science means the use of scientific method: observe, hypothesize, test, record results, conclude, repeat. The studies are published in peer reviewed journals.
That's what I would consider real science and just call it science.