Challenge for those that believe in billions of years for the age of things. Give anything that is more than 6000 years old. NO ASSUMPTIONS ALLOWED.

[Trailblazer]

I find it insulting that you repeatedly use the word "idiotic" to characterize sharing evidence of the supernatural with others.

I also find that insulting if he is implying that someone is an idiot for sharing evidence of the supernatural.
Trying to present evidence for the supernatural is not idiotic, but it is futile to share it with the naysayers.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

I also find that insulting if he is implying that someone is an idiot for sharing evidence of the supernatural.
Trying to present evidence for the supernatural is not idiotic, but it is futile to share it with the naysayers.

Well all claims of miraculous events should be verified.

 

[Trailblazer]

You have rain, you lucky person you, we have drought, about 6 hours rain since May. Water restrictions are in force, rivers are low, my local Ceou river is a series of pools joined by a trickle. So if you can see your way to diverting a few million gallons across the Atlantic i will be very grateful.

We were in a kind of drought before it started raining about a week ago, since it did not rain all summer. This rain started rather suddenly and now we are in for the long haul. Why am I surprised? It dues this every year, but it doesn't usually start until at least October.

I'd send you a few million gallons if I could! And we will still have plenty left over. Welcome to Washington!

 

[Trailblazer]

Well all claims of miraculous events should be verified.

How do you think you can 'verify' a miraculous event?
Miracles are only convincing to a limited number of people who witness them and they are not decisive proofs even for those who see them.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

How do you think you can 'verify' a miraculous event?
Miracles are only convincing to a limited number of people who witness them and they are not decisive proofs even for those who see them.

Many medical miracles that cannot be explained but are documents or testified by those that they happened to.
And all the documented ones in the Bible, especially the resurrection.

 

[Sgt. Pepper]

How do you think you can 'verify' a miraculous event?
Miracles are only convincing to a limited number of people who witness them and they are not decisive proofs even for those who see them.

I have evidence of the supernatural that has been repeated, but because I only give readings in person and not online, I can't demonstrate it in this thread. However, I've shared my stories of giving readings to people in real life in my threads and in other threads relating to the paranormal. As I've explained in these threads (such as this one here), I've given readings to many people who didn't believe in the paranormal, and none of them remained skeptical of the paranormal after I revealed specific private information that was only known between them and their deceased loved ones (such as the first and last names of their living or deceased relatives, exact dates of key events in their lives, family vacations, certain places they visited or traveled to outside of the country, and specific childhood memories that they have). I also have repeatable evidence of the paranormal that I've collected from haunted locations, including laser grid data, digital pictures, thermal images, SLS images (with no objects or people in the vicinity of the camera to explain the images), and EVPs recorded on a digital recorder with no people in the vicinity of the recorder. I'm a seasoned paranormal investigator with sixteen years of experience.

 

[Trailblazer]

Many medical miracles that cannot be explained but are documents or testified by those that they happened to.

Maybe there are medical miracles but can you prove that God had anything to do with them? No.

And all the documented ones in the Bible, especially the resurrection.

Anyone can write a story saying that people rose from the dead, but a story is not proof that anything in that story ever actually took place.

 

[Jimmy]

I find it insulting that you repeatedly use the word "idiotic" to characterize sharing evidence of the supernatural with others. You may not believe in what I do in terms of investigating the paranormal and sharing my results with others, but labeling it as idiotic is insulting to me. I have devoted the last 16 years of my life to researching and investigating the paranormal. The reason I post on this forum about my experiences with the paranormal is to offer other people who have never experienced what I have a glimpse into what it's like to experience something so extraordinary. My main objective is to educate others about the paranormal in an effort to help dispel the negative stigma associated with it. I don't share my years of experience on this forum to argue and debate with skeptics or try to persuade them to believe. They can make up their own minds whether to believe me or not. To be honest, it makes no difference to me whether others believe me or not because their skepticism doesn't alter the reality of my experiences, which span 44 years of my life. FYI, I disagree with your personal beliefs, but out of respect for you, I would never refer to them as idiotic or use any other derogatory term to describe them.

I never called what do you do idiotic. I’m entitled to think that trying to show proof for the supernatural is idiotic. If you’re hurt by this then that’s you’re problem. Furthermore what you do I don’t even believe in or give any merit at all.

 

[Trailblazer]

I have evidence of the supernatural that has been repeated, but because I only give readings in person and not online, I can't demonstrate it in this thread. However, I've shared my stories of giving readings to people in real life in my threads and in other threads relating to the paranormal. As I've explained in these threads (such as this one here), I've given readings to many people who didn't believe in the paranormal, and none of them remained skeptical of the paranormal after I revealed specific private information that was only known between them and their deceased loved ones (such as the first and last names of their living or deceased relatives, exact dates of key events in their lives, family vacations, certain places they visited or traveled to outside of the country, and specific childhood memories that they have). I also have repeatable evidence of the paranormal that I've collected from haunted locations, including laser grid data, digital pictures, thermal images, SLS images (with no objects or people in the vicinity of the camera to explain the images), and EVPs recorded on a digital recorder with no people in the vicinity of the recorder. I'm a seasoned paranormal investigator with sixteen years of experience.

I have evidence of the supernatural that was repeated 10 times, but I can't demonstrate it in this thread.

 

[Sgt. Pepper]

I never called what do you do idiotic. I’m entitled to think that trying to show proof for the supernatural is idiotic. If you’re hurt by this then that’s you’re problem

However, I have been doing this for the past sixteen years. I've been sharing evidence of the supernatural. It's a very important part of my life.

Yes, you have the right to believe what you want, and I have the right to call you out on it if I disagree. I find your attitude to be the problem.

 

[ChristineM]

.... Furthermore what you do I don’t even believe in or give any merit at all.

Oh the hypocrisy, it burns, it burns.

Your supernatural is ok but you don't believe someone elses supernatural

 

[Jimmy]

However, I have been doing this for the past sixteen years. I've been sharing evidence of the supernatural. It's a very important part of my life.

Yes, you have the right to believe what you want, and I have the right to call you out on it if I disagree. I find your attitude to be the problem.

Attitude? Haha When tons of people here require proof about the supernatural well they’re bound to get a response like that

 

[Jimmy]

Oh the hypocrisy, it burns, it burns.

Your supernatural is ok but you don't believe someone elses supernatural

Oh the hypocrisy, it burns, it burns.

Your supernatural is ok but you don't believe someone elses supernatural

You like that don’t you?

 

[Jimmy]

Oh the hypocrisy, it burns, it burns.

Your supernatural is ok but you don't believe someone elses supernatural

Oui

 

[ChristineM]

You like that don’t you?

I love it, it teaches me so much, but i doubt you can see what you've done

 

[Sgt. Pepper]

Oh the hypocrisy, it burns, it burns.

Your supernatural is ok but you don't believe someone elses supernatural

^ This. My sentiments exactly.

 

[Jimmy]

Oh the hypocrisy, it burns, it burns.

Your supernatural is ok but you don't believe someone elses supernatural

My supernatural Is regarding the end and beginning of all of existence not ghosts and talking to the dead. I respect those that do it but I still think it’s falsehood

 

[Jimmy]

I love it, it teaches me so much, but i doubt you can see what you've done

What I’ve done is clear.

 

[ChristineM]

My supernatural Is regarding the end and beginning of all of existence not ghosts and talking to the dead. I respect those that do it but I still think it’s falsehood

Thought according to @Sgt. Pepper and even the extremely religious @Trailblazer there seems to be far more evidence for ghosts etc than your end and beginning. A conundrum don't you think.

 

[ChristineM]

What I’ve done is clear.

It's certainly clear to me