Challenge for those that believe in billions of years for the age of things. Give anything that is more than 6000 years old. NO ASSUMPTIONS ALLOWED.

[John53]

What I’ve done is clear.

You haven't done anything other than troll so correct it is clear what you have done.

 

[Jimmy]

You haven't done anything other than troll so correct it is clear what you have done.

Troll? I engaged all the people on here that demanded evidence for the supernatural and they got all bent out of shape. It’s ridiculous to even ask such things

 

[Jimmy]

Thought according to @Sgt. Pepper and even the extremely religious @Trailblazer there seems to be far more evidence for ghosts etc than your end and beginning. A conundrum don't you think.

They have evidence, I don’t. No conundrum here

 

[Bthoth]

Here is simple challenge for those that believe in billions of years for the age of things. Give anything that is more than 6000 years old. NO ASSUMPTIONS ALLOWED.

I will soon post a thread that will refute billions of years and evolution.

1..... Dinosaur bones. Did god put them in the soil ............... just to employ people?


2....... That could be fun. Can you give a hint on the start date?

 

[ChristineM]

Troll? I engaged all the people stomped my foot on here at people that demanded evidence for the supernatural. It’s ridiculous to even ask such things

Fixed for you

And yes we know its ridiculous, just as ridiculous as saying the supernatural exist

 

[Bthoth]

I have seen so many of these types of debates, I know exactly where he will go next: dating techniques rely on assumptions.

Just like religion(s).

You would think, that if a god inspired each of the religions, that cancer would have been addressed to give many innocent children a chance.

 

[ChristineM]

They have evidence, I don’t. No conundrum here

Are you nor reading the relevant posts?

They claim to have evidence. And you don't, i fact you claim it's idiotic to make such a claim

 

[Jimmy]

Fixed for you

And yes we know its ridiculous, just as ridiculous as saying the supernatural exist

Stomped? Tapped maybe. I know all of you know it’s ridiculous yet you still ask it so I thought I’d join in on the frivolous. You have much to learn.

 

[Jimmy]

Fixed for you

And yes we know its ridiculous, just as ridiculous as saying the supernatural exist

I thought your two buddies had evidence? Who’s stomping now?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Can you meet this challenge?

What "challenge"? There was no challenge. You need to make a coherent argument to have one. I can help you with that, but right now you just posted a bunch of ignorant nonsense.

 

[ChristineM]

Stomped? Tapped maybe. I know all of you know it’s ridiculous yet you still ask it so I thought I’d join in on the frivolous. You have much to learn.

We asked because you made a claim, the idea being to see if you can justify your claim or whether you make your claim on blind faith alone.

I think we have our answer

 

[ChristineM]

I thought your two buddies had evidence? Who’s stomping now?

They claim to have evidence, i made that clear, please don't mince mt words

 

[Subduction Zone]

Well all claims of miraculous events should be verified.

They tend to disappear when they do and even if there is a cure where the cause is unknown that is not evidence for a god of any sort. You do not seem to know what and what is not evidence so all that you have are arguments from ignorance. And those are logical fallacies.

 

[Sgt. Pepper]

They have evidence, I don’t. No conundrum here

I've shared some of my evidence in the paranormal activities forum and in other threads relating to the paranormal for nearly two years now.

Have you posted any evidence in your own threads or in other threads to support your beliefs?

 

[Subduction Zone]

What I’ve done is clear.

Yes, to everyone but you.

 

[Jimmy]

We asked because you made a claim, the idea being to see if you can justify your claim or whether you make your claim on blind faith alone.

I think we have our answer

I’ve justified on other threads. I joined this thread in support of the op. Not that I agree with their ideas but everyone kept asking him for evidence so i thought I’d chime in on the frivolous.

 

[Trailblazer]

Thought according to @Sgt. Pepper and even the extremely religious @Trailblazer there seems to be far more evidence for ghosts etc than your end and beginning. A conundrum don't you think.

Well, I would certainly not call myself extremely religious. I have a religion but I am not very religious since I don't like religion all that much.
I am certainly not like most of the other Baha'is who are very religious.

I have never seen any ghosts but I believe what @Sgt. Pepper has experienced.
I never experienced anything paranormal until my late husband passed on but since then he has paid me 10 visits.
I have never seen him but I know he was here since there is no 'normal' explanation for what occurred.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I’ve justified on other threads. I joined this thread in support of the op. Not that I agree with their ideas but everyone kept asking him for evidence so i thought I’d chime in on the frivolous.

Really? I have never seen you justify your claims. I must have missed those threads.

 

[Jimmy]

They claim to have evidence, i made that clear, please don't mince mt words

But you used the word ridiculous. Won’t your friends take offense to that like they took offense to me when I used the word idiotic?

 

[Jimmy]

I've shared some of my evidence in the paranormal activities forum and in other threads relating to the paranormal for nearly two years now.

Have you posted any evidence in your own threads or in other threads to support your beliefs?

Not evidence but I shared why I believe what I believe