• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Challenge for those that believe in billions of years for the age of things. Give anything that is more than 6000 years old. NO ASSUMPTIONS ALLOWED.

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
False. Evolution is a successful theory in science that explains observations.

But religions tend to be false. Partial credit for that.



You have been given an answer. Why keep asking?
Evolution is a false religion that has brought misery throughout the world.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Repeating false beliefs doesn’t make them true. It makes your religion foolish.



Only to fundamentalists who believe in creationism. What agony fundamentalists must experience by knowing children are being taught valid science.
I love science. I am against false science like evolution and billions of years which are insane.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
I love science.
No you don’t. You assume the religious beliefs you adopted from others is true and science is wrong. That’s contempt.

I am against false science like evolution and billions of years which are insane.
There is no rational reason to assume your interpretation of Genesis is absolute and true. You have zero awareness that you could be mistaken.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
I love science. I am against false science like evolution and billions of years which are insane.
Cool. So you say you love science.
But don't seem to be aware that evolutionary theory incorporates data from multiple different fields of science such as geology, paleobotany, botany, chemistry, physics, zoology, microbiology, biochemistry, physics, medicine, just to name a few.
And of course you know that evolution is the backbone of biology, right? As in, biology doesn't make any sense without evolution.

So it appears that you reject the vast majority of science. But you also love it somehow. Or so you claim. How do you reconcile this?
 

McBell

Unbound
Well here are the real issues with the mythical first creature.
If you say so.
Though you still have not demonstrated you understand any of it.
what was the first living creature?
Already answered
How did it handle osmosis and diffusion?
I do not know
This is more than just water. There are many other ions whose flow and concentration must be tightly controlled.
If you say so.
Though you still have not demonstrated you understand any of it.
what was controlling the gating of these functions and what transport was used?
I do not know
How did it replenish its chemical energy stores?
I do not know
How did it replicate?
I do not know
How did it prevent many copying errors?
I do not know
How did it assemble all these amino acids into large sequences?
I do not know
How did it do these things while protecting itself?
I do not know
You see why this destroys the myth of abiogenesis.
nope. not at all.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
If you say so.
Though you still have not demonstrated you understand any of it.

Already answered

I do not know

If you say so.
Though you still have not demonstrated you understand any of it.

I do not know

I do not know

I do not know

I do not know

I do not know

I do not know

nope. not at all.
Thanks for all the great answers.
 
Top