Well before any adam/eve or god
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Challenge for those that believe in billions of years for the age of things. Give anything that is more than 6000 years old. NO ASSUMPTIONS ALLOWED.
- Thread starter SavedByTheLord
- Start date
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
No answer from you thanks.
You quoted my answer. I thought you would agree, as evidence of honesty
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
I have proved that evolution could not answer a simple question.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No. You proved that you could not ask a proper question. There is a big difference.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Why are there No partially developed organs or functional in any creature today or in the fossil record?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Because we do not expect to see them. You have a flowed understanding of the theory of evolution.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Wow that is crazy even for an evolutionist.
Of course you should ample documentation.
You have no understanding of the theory of evolution, one of the greatest delusions of all time.
So please answer these absolutely required questions .
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Why is your inability to understand a simple concept crazy?
By the way, when you ask improper questions, as you just asked in the previous post. the answer only needs to point out how your question was poorly formed.
Try again without the strawman argument.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
So again the evolutionists have no answer to any question of the origin of anything, just verbal garbage .
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Oh we have answers. You cannot demand them until you demonstrate that you will no longer use bogus debating techniques.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Stop the bogus debate techniques.
Again the evolutionists have no answers to anything.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Projection. That is not a bogus technique when an opponent has demonstrated that he cannot be an honest interlocutor. Follow the rules of debate and there will be no need for me to apply such conditions to you.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
More false accusations from the losing evolutionary side.
What was the first living creature? Please give the official answer as a puppet .
What was the name of the first cousin of the friend of the inventor of the automobile?
What is the unladen weight of an African swallow driving a Ferrari?
What are the middle names of the people stuffed into a Volkswagen?
Do Ford Mustangs eat their young?
Why did the government ban knockoff wheels in 1968?
How can roads go somewhere yet always stay in the same place?
Why do we drive on parkways and park in driveways?
How can you drive 500 miles in a circle without getting dizzy?
Why are they called tires when they take so long to wear out?
What was the name of the first car? No assumptions.
How many parts did it have?
What are the names of the people that made the parts.
Do Ford Falcons hunt in flocks or are they solitary predators?
Even if you answer, I am going to ignore that and declare you are not watching car races.
Ha refuted! In civilised countries they are tyres. Feel the wrath of my refutation!
I think many of us are seeing your problem - too low a bar for evidence you like, too high a bar for evidence you don't like. I would think, and not unreasonably, that those earlier would need something to write on, plus the fact that such materials are prone to decay and hence why few examples remain of the earliest use of such.
Papyrus - Wikipedia
History of paper - Wikipedia
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Like the pyramids Or ziggurats or etchings on the same?I think many of us are seeing your problem - too low a bar for evidence you like, too high a bar for evidence you don't like. I would think, and not unreasonably, that those earlier would need something to write on, plus the fact that such materials are prone to decay and hence why few examples remain of the earliest use of such.
Papyrus - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
History of paper - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Or a yearly counting of years passed down through oral tradition until it finally was written somewhere?
Unfortunately, oral tradition for some obscure reason, leaves little evidence.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Until it is written somewhere or etched in stone.Unfortunately, oral tradition for some obscure reason, leaves little evidence.
And where are all the remains of all those prehistoric people and all their artifacts.
They were probably more intelligent than you, so where are all their tools,