Trailblazer
Veteran Member
We would hope so, but.......That is a cat 5 Hurricane or Tornado
Should help to break wind!
Regards Tony
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
We would hope so, but.......That is a cat 5 Hurricane or Tornado
Should help to break wind!
Regards Tony
Unfortunately, that would be like Christians asking you to read "Evidence that Demands a Verdict" by Josh McDowell. It ain't gonna happen.The Biblical proof that backs Baha’u’llah up can be found in this book: Thief in the Night
To believe Muhammad was the next manifestation after Jesus, then that would mean that Christianity was in its "winter" as one Baha'i had said in the Great Beings thread. It would also mean that the main focus of the NT on the very "next" coming of the Christ-Spirit should have been Muhammad. How much is prophesied about Muhammad in the Bible? You mention Daniel and Revelation, what else?Muhammad was a Messenger of God as foretold by Daniel and Revelation. Muhammad was a necessary link in God and His Faiths. Muhammad corrected the false doctrine of the trinity in the 600's. Had Christianity found God in the Message of Muhammad and the Koran, this conversation would not be happening, the error would have been corrected 1260 years before Christ returned again in Baha'u'llah, the Glory of God.
"O People of the Book! Commit no excesses in your religion: Nor say of Allah aught but the truth. Christ Jesus the son of Mary was (no more than) a messenger of Allah, and His Word, which He bestowed on Mary, and a spirit proceeding from Him: so believe in Allah and His messengers. Say not "Trinity": desist: it will be better for you: for Allah is one Allah: Glory be to Him: (far exalted is He) above having a son. To Him belong all things in the heavens and on earth. And enough is Allah as a Disposer of affairs. " (4:171, Yusif Ali)
"Christ the son of Mary was no more than a messenger; many were the messengers that passed away before him. His mother was a woman of truth. They had both to eat their (daily) food. See how Allah doth make His signs clear to them; yet see in what ways they are deluded away from the truth!" (5:575, Yusif Ali)
Regards Tony
Unfortunately, that would be like Christians asking you to read "Evidence that Demands a Verdict" by Josh McDowell. It ain't gonna happen.
To believe Muhammad was the next manifestation after Jesus, then that would mean that Christianity was in its "winter" as one Baha'i had said in the Great Beings thread. It would also mean that the main focus of the NT on the very "next" coming of the Christ-Spirit should have been Muhammad. How much is prophesied about Muhammad in the Bible? You mention Daniel and Revelation, what else?
True, not gonna happen for most Christians but it did happen for a few... they are now Baha'is...Unfortunately, that would be like Christians asking you to read "Evidence that Demands a Verdict" by Josh McDowell. It ain't gonna happen.
True, not gonna happen for most Christians but it did happen for a few... they are now Baha'is...
Yes, we have all the Townshend books and I have read them. I refer to them often.George Townsend even wrote his own books to call His congregations to accept Baha'u'llah. 'Christ and Baha'u'llah' a call from the heart as well! That is also a very good read.
Regards Tony
...
One thing I have not looked for yet is the Elijah of the Muslim era. That would be interesting to explore. There would have been an Elijah.
Regards Tony
That is why I'm bringing up Muhammad. He is the return of Christ that should be the main focus of the NT. He is the very next manifestation that people need to know about and recognize. But the Baha'i view is that Christianity had run its course and needed updating. If the Baha'is are right, it is worse than that. Christianity went astray as soon as its followers started writing Christian beliefs, and writing down the things Jesus did, and writing down what to look for when he returns.It would be the Christain asking the Jew to read that book. A Christain would only be offering a different view of the same Christ and Bible to another believer in Christ.
You seem to forget we have accepted Christ and the Bible 100%.
You are correct in a sense, as my mother would not read Thief in the Night. But the is like a Jew not wishing to read material from Christ.
Regards Tony
Also, Baha'is already have Muhammad as the first "Woe" and one of the "Two Witnesses" in Revelation. Both of those aren't very convincing for me, let alone for Christians. But that's the tough sell Baha'is have. They, not only have to show that Baha'u'llah is the return of Christ, but also the Bab and Muhammad. And before them, that Moses, Abraham, Noah, Adam, Buddha and Krishna, and whomever else Baha'is say are manifestations, are all equal to Jesus and all are prophesied about Baha'u'llah. It's difficult enough to try and prove Baha'u'llah is the one prophesied in the Bible, and especially in Revelation. Which states Jesus by name a couple of times and says things about the Lamb that was slain, the Lamb and his twelve apostles, the blood of the Lamb... all things that allude to Jesus.Each Mesenger fulfills prophecy with their Message. Some is spiritual some has a material unfolding.
Muhammad came at a time when many veils had been placed.
One thing I have not looked for yet is the Elijah of the Muslim era. That would be interesting to explore. There would have been an Elijah.
Regards Tony
That is why I'm bringing up Muhammad. He is the return of Christ that should be the main focus of the NT. He is the very next manifestation that people need to know about and recognize. But the Baha'i view is that Christianity had run its course and needed updating. If the Baha'is are right, it is worse than that. Christianity went astray as soon as its followers started writing Christian beliefs, and writing down the things Jesus did, and writing down what to look for when he returns.
Baha'is say Muhammad "corrected" the teachings about the Trinity, but what did he say about heaven and hell, and angels and demons. Did he correct the "truth" about the resurrection. Baha'is say that Ishmael, not Isaac, was the one sacrificed. If that is so, why didn't Christianity correct the "error" made in the Jewish Scriptures. Instead, they support it. But you, as a Baha'i, should read why Evangelical/Fundamentalist Christians believe as they do. And reading some of their books on apologetics wouldn't hurt.
Unfortunately, the other way around is less likely to happen. Christians do believe there are evil, false teachers out there. And since they don't believe Baha'is believe "100%" in Jesus and the Bible, they are going to put the Baha'i Faith into that category, as a false teaching and avoid it.
But that's the tough sell Baha'is have. They, not only have to show that Baha'u'llah is the return of Christ, but also the Bab and Muhammad. And before them, that Moses, Abraham, Noah, Adam, Buddha and Krishna, and whomever else Baha'is say are manifestations, are all equal to Jesus and all are prophesied about Baha'u'llah.
But don't Baha'is like William Sears write their books trying to prove Baha'u'llah is the return of Christ?CG. That is not for us to prove. It is clear that we are to present the Message and it is up to others to look within their own hearts to see if it is the answer.
We are told that we must have wisdom in what we give forth and if rejection is found, then to offer it no more.
It is that last bit of wisdom, which is hard to find and practice. That is, has rejection been reached, or is it still only doubt.
Regards Tony
But don't Baha'is like William Sears write their books trying to prove Baha'u'llah is the return of Christ?
There is a great amount of ambiguity in most of the prophesies fulfilled, you've got the "new name" and the "1260" years, but the others aren't at all that clear and convincing.
Like Brad Pitt is the Clark Gable of the 90s then there must be "the Elijah of the Muslim era", right? Hey, you'll never know you could be the next J.K. Rowling, the Harry Potter series author.One thing I have not looked for yet is the Elijah of the Muslim era. That would be interesting to explore. There would have been an Elijah.
Regards Tony
Unfortunately, many people leave the Baha'i Faith or don't participate... at all, but don't bother to drop their membership. For me that's troubling, because it indicates that the initial contact with the Baha'i Faith was positive and convincing... that they had found the truth of God for today. But then they leave?True, not gonna happen for most Christians but it did happen for a few... they are now Baha'is...
But you started this thread and what are the things we should be looking for in the return of Christ? The things prophesied... like in Revelation. Only a couple of chapters are interpreted by Abdu'l Baha. And some Baha'is have published books on Revelation, but since it isn't from Abdu'l Baha, why is their opinion all that meaningful? They aren't "infallible", so why would their interpretation count as anything that can be trusted? Heck, I'm having problems believing Abdu'l Baha's interpretations. Oh, I checked online on a couple of books by Baha'is, and they weren't all that cheap. So I'm counting on you and the others to throw me a few pertinent quotes from those books once in a while.It was not Prophecy that appealed to my heart in the first place. Prophecy is just a great bonus.
What struck me was we are One Human Race. That there was one God who has given all Faith. That no man should be preferred above another and women were our equal.
That just made perfect sense to me.
Regards Tony