Christians and Jews Who Sanction Homosexual Sex

[1robin]

Okay.

.

Okay back at you.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Ok.


Your an emotional bomb looking for a match.

Wow, two posts to me and they both have personal attacks in them.

You are really one for the books. What on earth are you talking about? I didn't say anything about destroying anything.

Your memory is not up to par:

" my post was about the destruction of homosexuality,"

No I didn't, please go back and review.

I was assuming that you could reason logically. We can go over it together if you wish.

Now this I actually get.

Do you think that you can be polite and rational? I can assure you that I will be.

 

[Subduction Zone]

No, lets go back again.

1. Homosexuality kills people and costs billions and has nothing by which it justifies this cost.

2. Heterosexuality kills people and costs billions but is required to perpetuate the human race and sustain a traditional family unit.

One is justifiable where as the other isn't.

 

[1robin]

Wow, two posts to me and they both have personal attacks in them.

I quit keeping score a long time ago. Please get back to the actual debate.

Your memory is not up to par:

" my post was about the destruction of homosexuality,"

Your mistaken. I was not talking about destroying homosexuality I was referring to the destruction CAUSED by homosexuality.

I was assuming that you could reason logically. We can go over it together if you wish.

Oh brother. You lasted almost three posts. I straightened out YOUR misunderstanding above.

Do you think that you can be polite and rational? I can assure you that I will be.

I usually treat people a little better than they deserve. Do you understand what I meant by the destruction of homosexuality yet?

 

[1robin]

I have little patience when it comes to discussing anything with you and this is the reason why. Post actual arguments instead of color commentary or in this case posting a bunch of silly symbols where you should have posted an argument. Please pick up your game.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I quit keeping score a long time ago. Please get back to the actual debate.

Then please try to be civil.

Your mistaken. I was not talking about destroying homosexuality I was referring to the destruction CAUSED by homosexuality.

You seem to be a bit confused by cause and effect.

Oh brother. You lasted almost three posts. I straightened out YOUR misunderstanding above.

Wrong again,. There was no misunderstanding on my part. Once again you are mistaken.

I usually treat people a little better than they deserve. Do you understand what I meant by the destruction of homosexuality yet?

I sincerely doubt this claim. You appear to be a very poor judge of what people deserve. And you can't "destroy homosexuality". That is in fact a very immoral proposal on your part.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I have little patience when it comes to discussing anything with you and this is the reason why. Post actual arguments instead of color commentary or in this case posting a bunch of silly symbols where you should have posted an argument. Please pick up your game.

All you need to do is to rein in your prejudice and try to reason rationally.

Why don't you try to post something that is worthy of a response instead of posting hate and ignorance?

 

[1robin]

Then please try to be civil.

Okay.

You seem to be a bit confused by cause and effect.

We were not discussing cause and effect, we were discussing what I meant by a statement I typed.

Wrong again,. There was no misunderstanding on my part. Once again you are mistaken.

It was my statement. I am the only one who knows what I meant.

I sincerely doubt this claim. You appear to be a very poor judge of what people deserve. And you can't "destroy homosexuality". That is in fact a very immoral proposal on your part.

I have said at least 3 times so far that I meant the destruction homosexuality causes not destroying homosexuality. This is the last time I am going to straighten out your misunderstanding of what I said.

 

[1robin]

All you need to do is to rein in your prejudice and try to reason rationally.

Why don't you try to post something that is worthy of a response instead of posting hate and ignorance?

Okay, last shot. Produce arguments not rhetoric and color commentary or I am out.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Okay.



We were not discussing cause and effect, we were discussing what I meant by a statement I typed.

The English language can be very useful for communicating.

It was my statement. I am the only one who knows what I meant.

Then why make it? That seems to be a pointless exercise, again the English language used properly is an amazing communication tool.

I have said at least 3 times so far that I meant the destruction homosexuality causes not destroying homosexuality. This is the last time I am going to straighten out your misunderstanding of what I said.

But it does not "cause" those woes. And remember, when you are in the wrong you can't "straighten out" anyone.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Okay, last shot. Produce arguments not rhetoric and color commentary or I am out.

.
I am not the one posting nonsense here. I am only making your nonsense obvious to you.

You seem to be rather hate filled towards your fellow man and have a strange opinion of what sex is for. It is for much more than procreation.

 

[1robin]

The English language can be very useful for communicating.

I have not been using Chinese.

Then why make it? That seems to be a pointless exercise, again the English language used properly is an amazing communication tool.

I can't help the fact you misunderstood what I said. I took the time to correct you and you still won't move on.

But it does not "cause" those woes. And remember, when you are in the wrong you can't "straighten out" anyone.

According to the CDC it does.

Estimated New HIV Infections in the United States by Transmission Category, 2015

*Includes infections among gay and bisexual men who inject drugs and therefore have two risk factors.

Source: CDC. Estimated HIV incidence and prevalence in the United States, 2010-2015. HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report 2018;23(1).

HIV Diagnoses
In 2016, 39,782 people received an HIV diagnosis. The annual number of HIV diagnoses declined 5% between 2011 and 2015.

New HIV Diagnoses in the United States for the Most-Affected Subpopulations, 2016

Subpopulations representing 2% or less of all people who received an HIV diagnosis in 2016 are not represented in this chart.

Source: CDC. Diagnoses of HIV infection in the United States and dependent areas, 2016. HIV Surveillance Report 2017;28.

Gay and bisexual menc are the population most affected by HIV. In 2016:

• Gay and bisexual men accounted for 67% (26,570) of all HIV diagnoses and 83% of diagnoses among males.
• Black/African Americand gay and bisexual men accounted for the largest number of HIV diagnoses (10,223), followed by Hispanic/Latinoe (7,425) and white (7,390) gay and bisexual men.

HIV in the United States | Statistics Overview | Statistics Center | HIV/AIDS | CDC

I can't wait to see the intellectual gymnastics your going to attempt to get out of this.

 

[1robin]

.
I am not the one posting nonsense here. I am only making your nonsense obvious to you.

You seem to be rather hate filled towards your fellow man and have a strange opinion of what sex is for. It is for much more than procreation.

Produce arguments not rhetoric and color commentary or I am out

 

[Subduction Zone]

I have not been using Chinese.

You have not been using English either. You admitted as much when you said that only you understand what you meant by "destruction of homosexuality". Since homosexuality is a natural trait I don't think you nor anyone else can "destroy" it.

I can't help the fact you misunderstood what I said. I took the time to correct you and you still won't move on.

No, once again, when you are in the wrong you can't correct another. Perhaps if you worked on your inability to understand this topic you would see your error.

According to the CDC it does.

Estimated New HIV Infections in the United States by Transmission Category, 2015

*Includes infections among gay and bisexual men who inject drugs and therefore have two risk factors.

Source: CDC. Estimated HIV incidence and prevalence in the United States, 2010-2015. HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report 2018;23(1).

HIV Diagnoses
In 2016, 39,782 people received an HIV diagnosis. The annual number of HIV diagnoses declined 5% between 2011 and 2015.

New HIV Diagnoses in the United States for the Most-Affected Subpopulations, 2016

Subpopulations representing 2% or less of all people who received an HIV diagnosis in 2016 are not represented in this chart.

Source: CDC. Diagnoses of HIV infection in the United States and dependent areas, 2016. HIV Surveillance Report 2017;28.

Gay and bisexual menc are the population most affected by HIV. In 2016:

• Gay and bisexual men accounted for 67% (26,570) of all HIV diagnoses and 83% of diagnoses among males.
• Black/African Americand gay and bisexual men accounted for the largest number of HIV diagnoses (10,223), followed by Hispanic/Latinoe (7,425) and white (7,390) gay and bisexual men.

HIV in the United States | Statistics Overview | Statistics Center | HIV/AIDS | CDC

I can't wait to see the intellectual gymnastics your going to attempt to get out of this.

I am well aware of those statistics. You appear to be misapplying them. No gymnastics needed since you cannot even state your case.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Produce arguments not rhetoric and color commentary or I am out

Produce something to argue about. You are only getting back what you put out. I am not the one getting made here. Perhaps that is because when I want to make a point I can make it.

 

[columbus]

I can't wait to see the intellectual gymnastics your going to attempt to get out of this.

No gymnastics.
Just point out that STDs, and many other problems, are the results of irresponsible sex not homosex. AIDS is a bigger problem for gay men than most other demographic groups here in the USA. But the overwhelming majority of AIDS victims don't live here and aren't gay.

The single biggest problem created by irresponsible sex has little to do with gays. It's crisis pregnancy. The huge number of abortions and neglectfully raised children could be reduced if more people had homosex instead of potentially fertile sex.
Tom

 

[Subduction Zone]

No gymnastics.
Just point out that STDs, and many other problems, are the results of irresponsible sex not homosex. AIDS is a bigger problem for gay men than most other demographic groups here in the USA. But the overwhelming majority of AIDS victims don't live here and aren't gay.

The single biggest problem created by irresponsible sex has little to do with gays. It's crisis pregnancy. The huge number of abortions and neglectfully raised children could be reduced if more people had homosex instead of potentially fertile sex.
Tom

What is amazing is that using the bad logic we have seen here one could make the case that non-white races need to be "destroyed ". Posting the racial numbers for AIDS was a bit of a faux pas. Instead one should look more than skin deep into this issue.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

No, lets go back again.

1. Homosexuality kills people and costs billions and has nothing by which it justifies this cost.

2. Heterosexuality kills people and costs billions but is required to perpetuate the human race and sustain a traditional family unit.

One is justifiable where as the other isn't.

If you aren't prepared to answer a direct question directly, I'm not playing with you. If you wish to continue while abiding by the basic rules of discussion and courtesy, please let me know and I'll be happy to go on.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

What is amazing is that using the bad logic we have seen here one could make the case that non-white races need to be "destroyed ". Posting the racial numbers for AIDS was a bit of a faux pas. Instead one should look more than skin deep into this issue.

Skin deep? Don't mention the Caucasian increased likelihood of skin cancer and the numbers it kills and costs or we'll be the next to go!

 

[Loviatar]

Let's just get rid of everything that ups your risk of death. We'll ban being gay, being a ginger, being someone who likes burgers, being a scuba diving enthusiast...

In all seriousness, Columbus' post above absolutely won the thread. Being straight and promiscuous is high risk. Being gay and non-promiscuous is low risk so long as your partner also is, and I find it curious how 1robin neglects the fact that lesbians have the lowest STD rates of any group. I suppose all homosexuality is male?