Do you understand what you are even arguing, I think you lost track. I stated that Islam displaced those religions that came under its domain, taking about Greece or Western Africa is wasting my time.
Do you understand what you even said? You said:
What a useless assertation when Islam quite effectively displaced Paganism, Christianity, Judaism, and Hinduism throughout the ages.
But that's simply not true. Xy was gone from Israel before the Muslims showed up, so Islam didn't displace Xy there. It hasn't yet displaced Xy in Greece. Or Europe. or the Western hemisphere. Islam (though it has tried mightily) has never displaced Judaism from Israel. I have yet to see more Muslims than Hindi in India. The only places Islam has "displaced" Xy is in north Africa and Asia Minor. Heck, even Spain (strongly Xian) tossed the Moops out on their ears... I don't think that qualifies as "quite effectively." Even remotely.
Compare the number of Jews living in Palestine prior to the creation of Israel and the number of Muslims all the way back to the defeat of Byzantine rule.
Again, displacement implies movement away from. This doesn't represent displacement. What it
does represent is a higher degree of tolerance on the part of Judaism to continue to allow Muslims to live in their country, despite the refusal of Muslim countries to even recognize Israel's sovereignty and their continuous attempts to take over the country.
Do you have any other fallacies that you would like to use? Obviously the law is targeting Islam, even if the article is a Burqa, given French conduct and attitude towards Muslims it is clear what the intentions are. But again you divert the topic.
Make use of bandwith and address my point or I won't bother responding: Islam was a revocation of prior Arab culture and is largely culture less.
OK. Stop evading, as you have done with Auto: Are the traditional dress and the mosque (which are mandated by the religion) religious trappings or Arabic cultural trappings?
Prior to Islam the veil was not widespread and only found among the wealthiest of women, you are just reinforcing my points.
Thank you. That must mean, then, that the veil is a religious trapping, worn by women to show that they are, in fact, Muslim. Therefore, it creates something that is
uniquely religious and is, therefore, by definition a cultural symbol. Thanks for finally clarifying that.
The predominant culture? Do you understand what culture is? It is FOOD, LANGUAGE, DRESS. It is a fourth grade concept, do you wish for me to elaborate how it is possible to inherit Pakistani culture and not Islam?
2nd verse, same as the first. A little bit louder and a little bit worse.
Religion is also a cultural expression. Ask any sociologist.
It's not "a" religion, I could care less how intrinsically related other religions are with certain cultures, I am talking about Islam.
Which article do you prefer to use? "The?" Islam is "the" religion?
Now the True Colors are shown. Thank you. I suppose that's why Muslims living in France insist on wearing stuff that isn't French. And that's why they insist on building things in Switzerland that are not Swiss. Because "Islam has no culture of its own." Islam comes in, forces cultural changes, hoping to "displace" other religions, and, I might add, crowing about it when that happens. Let me ask you this: How many mosques were there in Northern Africa before Islam moved in? Hah? Islam won't be happy until the whole world is wearing sheets and broadcasting Arabic over loudspeakers mounted on towers.
half a million starving Iraqi children as a collective punishment of the Iraqi people for a dictator they couldn't control.
and **what** religion was Saddam Hussein? Hmmm? And that's our fault ...
how, again?
Perhaps you were unable to detect my sarcasm, the actions of 9/11 were carried out for nationalistic reasons given Americas involvement in the Muslim world for decades by people who weren't even particularly religious.
Which nation? Saudi? Qatar? Kuwait? Syria? Jordan? Lebanon? Libya? Iran? Which? This wasn't "nationalism," because it wasn't carried out by a "nation." And I don't see how you can say they weren't religious, since most of the people in those organizations were educated in religious schools, being taught the "religious" principles of hate.
They offered Bin Laden. What's illegal is drone strikes in Pakistan that kill as many civilians every year as those that died in 9/11. Good going champ.
They harbored
al qaeda. Remember the scud missiles? And the civilian killing that went on under Saddam Hussein? Yah.
Such euphemisms won't hide the innocent number of civilians killed for in illegal war over oil.
I have no idea what you're talking about. We were doing just fine until
al qaeda and the Taliban came along.
No you just slowly poison an entire country with depleted Uranium rounds.
I notice you live in Arizona. Whose side are you on? Perhaps you'd prefer if some airliners crashed into your home... This is an open country. Hopefully it will always remain so. No one's forcing you in or out...
I am not saying the U.S is intrinsically evil, but it is most definitely not intrinsically humane and to think that it considers humanitarian missions as something worth pursuing you must be real ignorant of the way the world works.
I suppose the "way the world works" is to move into an area, force your religion and your culture on them, and pretend that said religion is the "only real religion." Yes, Xy did that. We learned our lesson. When will Islam learn its lesson?