I don't care but apparently a lot of atheists care.
I didn't care enough to start a thread.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I don't care but apparently a lot of atheists care.
Yes, I could. But then again, I have cited actual evidence of you making claims, and of you using the phrase "logic 101 stuff" in far less than years worth of time. So... who is it more likely to be deceiving themselves here?Of course people can deceive themselves and that means you can also deceive yourself because you are a person.
You understand that I can literally READ your posts, right? And that THAT is exactly what this discussion is about? This is not a discussion about "Who is Trailblazer?" Not at all. This is a discussion about whether or not you are making claims when you state certain things definitively. Things like those that have already been pointed out to you as being claims. Whether or not you have adequate justification is irrelevant! It still may be a claim made, and the justification may still be asked for.You don't know anything about me, you just believe you do.
Your actual writings are free for anyone to peruse. It would be interesting to know the opinion of many of those not in the discussion, but it is mostly irrelevant. Many of your words constitute claims made, and as pointed out, you even add qualifiers at times that indicate that you believe the points to be so obvious that contention or disagreement should not be an option. You have done this... demonstrably.What you believe about me is not a fact, it is only a personal opinion, based upon your own thoughts and feelings that you cannot separate from what I have actually written.
Sources for this CLAIM? Please cite a professional who has done due diligence to evidence this to a great degree, and I will peruse that evidence and let you know what I think. Hahaha... oh boy.It is a well-known psychological fact that people who talk about others and point out their faults are the ones who have the problem.
The "I did not start this" bit? That's a claim. One that I am keen on denying. You DID start this. Who made the thread in the first place? That's a form of "starting" this, definitively. That literally cannot be denied without outing yourself as entirely irrational.I did not start this but now I am done.
That is good advice. I usually only go on for a while answering posts on a thread I started because I feel obligated. Then after a while it dies down.Then why! If it hurts you, just don't. I tend to avoid things that cause me pain, Is that just me?
I like discussing things with you but if it causes you distress I shall cease. Sometimes I'm old and grumpy, sometimes my sense of humour is interpreted differently to what I intended but I have no desire to cause you distress.
Look at the definitions you provided. Show me where it says that your intentions are relevant to whether or not it is a claim..None of any sentences where I state my beliefs fit the definition of a claim.
A claim is what YOU think it is, but you did not write the post so you don't know my intentions.
Yep. They are just trying to place themselves in a position whether they can say whatever the hell they want without being held accountable for what they say. It's a responsibility dodge akin to, Well, the other kids did it first. Or maybe, I was just following orders.Yeah, like a person can claim that the other person’s claim is true. Which sure seems like what Baha’is do.
I am not blaming anyone but I will correct people who are wrong about me and my intentions.You are the one who felt the need to start a thread, so that is simply hilarious. You can't start a debate in a public debate forum, then blame others for not agreeing with you,
If I am not claiming it it is not a claim.Look at the definitions you provided. Show me where it says that your intentions are relevant to whether or not it is a claim..
I have made no claims, I only stated beliefs.TB - that was a claim I made there, a claim that I believed something to be true, like a belief expressed publicly.
I am tired of being accused of making claims. I am not making any claims because I have nothing to claim since I am a nobody.
The Messengers of God made claims in their scriptures. The main things they claimed were that:
1) They were sent by God
2) That God communicated to them
3) That God exists
I believe their claims but I am making no claims since I have nothing to claim.
Atheists assert that I am making claims so they can say that I have the burden of proof, but I am making no claims just because I believe the claims of the Messengers of God, so I have no burden of proof.
The burden of proof rests on the person making the claim. The Messengers of God made the claims so they were responsible to meet the burden of proof. I believe that the true Messengers of God met their burden by providing evidence that supports their claims.
The evidence that supports the claims of any alleged Messenger of God is as follows:
1) Their Person (their character, as demonstrated by the life they led)
2) Their Revelation (the history, which is what they accomplished on their mission from God)
3) Their Words (the words that were attributed to them in scriptures, or what they wrote)
Anyone who wants to know if an alleged Messenger of God is a true Messenger of God is responsible to do their own research and look at the evidence that supports the claims of the alleged Messenger. I can point to where the evidence for Baha’u’llah resides but I am not responsible for doing other people’s homework.
According to my beliefs, God wants everyone to do their own homework and come to their own determinations because we are all responsible for our own beliefs. Baha’u’llah wrote that the faith of no man can be conditioned by anyone else because we are each accountable to God for our own beliefs on Judgment Day.
Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 143
All this makes logical sense if people could only remove their bias and think about what I just said. Of course, it would require atheists to think differently than they have always thought about claims and evidence and see another point of view that they had never considered.
Nope. It is not a claim unless I am making a claim.An opinion that something is true is a belief, an opinion or belief expressed publicly is a claim.
You can post every definition on the internet but you will still be wrong because I am not making any claims.You are simply and spectacularly wrong here, and yes, that is a claim,
That's fine. I don't expect people to see things the way I do. Most people won't.I've read the claims of the messengers and the messengers have failed to meet the burden of proof.
I did not mean that you cared but many atheists care.I didn't care enough to start a thread.
It's not my fault that both of the definitions that you provided directly refute you in this. Nor is it my fault that you have invested so much of your arrant pride into dodging accountability for your statements and assertions through such a thin and pointless sham. Nor is it my fault that you opened a thread that directly exposed the obvious flaws in your position. Don't get snippy with me. That is all on you.If I am not claiming it it is not a claim.
I am not claiming anything.
Case closed.
It is not my fault that you do not know the difference between a belief and a claim.It's not my fault that both of the definitions that you provided directly refute you in this. Nor is it my fault that you have invested so much of your arrant pride into dodging accountability for your statements and assertions through such a thin and pointless sham. Nor is it my fault that you opened a thread that directly exposed the obvious flaws in your position. Don't get snippy with me. That is all on you.
Now the case is closed.
I have but you deny it's existence.So you claim, but you have never posted any.
It is not my fault that you do not know the difference between a belief and a claim.
What is the difference between claim and belief?
Claim
Noun
· A demand of ownership made for something (e.g. claim ownership, claim victory).
· A new statement of truth made about something, usually when the statement has yet to be verified.
· A demand of ownership for previously unowned land (e.g. in the gold rush, oil rush)
· (legal) A legal demand for compensation or damages.
Do you mean this?2 is the only one that applies in the context of the thread and we all do it.
And for the third time I ask, what does the fact that you have a belief have to do with whether or not your statement is a claim? Show where in the definition it says that your belief is relevant to whether or not the statement is a claim.It is not my fault that you do not know the difference between a belief and a claim.
the definition for belief includes the definition of claimBelief
Noun
· Mental acceptance of a claim as likely true.
· Faith or trust in the reality of something; often based upon one's own reasoning, trust in a claim, desire of actuality, and/or evidence considered.