• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Cohen claims Trump approved

Kangaroo Feathers

Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
There were always the haters, for sure. I personally have never liked his style, but the real hate began to belch forth when he came out as a birther. That's when the proverbial **** hit the fan.
And? I mean, how much evidence do you need before you stop giving him the benefit of the doubt?

Personally I didn't know much about him before the election, but his conduct during the election alone was enough to convince me he was a liar and self serving opportunist completely unsuited for high office. His performance since being elected has only reinfirced my assessment again and again, IMHO. What else do you need before you stop unquestioningly taking what he says on faith?
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
Yes, among other reasons and his past. There's still nutty birthers running around America. I get it, you love Trump because he tells you what you want to hear. You don't care if he's lying to your face.

Nothing Trump says has any credibility unless completely fact checked. I'll provide the recent economic news as an example.

You won't find Tea Party supporters learning any of this information.

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...-checking-donald-trumps-points-about-economy/
Why do you pretend to think that I believe a word Trump says? If the truth be told, reality is the opposite.
But, then again, you know my thinking better than I do. *sigh*
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
And? I mean, how much evidence do you need before you stop giving him the benefit of the doubt?

Personally I didn't know much about him before the election, but his conduct during the election alone was enough to convince me he was a liar and self serving opportunist completely unsuited for high office. His performance since being elected has only reinfirced my assessment again and again, IMHO. What else do you need before you stop unquestioningly taking what he says on faith?
As I just told @tytlyf I don't personally believe a word Trump says and never have. Why do you insist on pretending otherwise?
 

Phantasman

Well-Known Member
Cohen's word is much more truthful than the Liar in Chief. You do realize that most people despised Trump long before the presidency? Don't act like it just started when he was elected.
Maybe Trump got elected because he lied less than Hillary lied. Works for me.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
He claims Trump approved of 2016 tower meeting. This puts Trump back in trouble if he is for Russian Collusion
and also he is being investigated for obstruction for justice. Well I will take back what I've been saying about Trump not being impeached. Maybe with all this crap maybe it might happen I don't know.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/26/poli...-trump-june-2016-meeting-knowledge/index.html

Wasn't illegal to have the meeting and it's hearsay. Wont stand up in court. Trump Jr would be in trouble if Cohen has evidence but he has nothing.
 

Kangaroo Feathers

Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
Wasn't illegal to have the meeting and it's hearsay. Wont stand up in court. Trump Jr would be in trouble if Cohen has evidence but he has nothing.
You sound awfully sure. I do note that we've gone from "there was no meeting! There was no collusion!" to "The meeting wasn't illegal, the collusion wasn't illegal". I guess we'll see.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
You sound awfully sure.

Just going on what the article says and what is considered hearsay.


I do note that we've gone from "there was no meeting! There was no collusion!" to "The meeting wasn't illegal, the collusion wasn't illegal". I guess we'll see.

I never said there was no meeting. If i remember correctly Trump denied knowledge and Jr denied topics discussed (taking Cohen's word for argument sake).
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
Well there you go. You support the conservative canadian versus the opposition. Didn't you say if you were American you would vote Trump?
I probably would have held my nose and supported the Republican nominee, yes.
 

Kangaroo Feathers

Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
Back up my "maybe"? I was responding to the post before me. Who invited you?
So rank, baseless speculation. Understood.

By the way, I understand having holes poked in core beliefs is unpleasant, and makes people defensive, but FYI, we're in a public discussion forum. Every one is invited. Even people who ask inconvenient questions.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Wasn't illegal to have the meeting and it's hearsay. Wont stand up in court. Trump Jr would be in trouble if Cohen has evidence but he has nothing.
It's not illegal to get head from an intern, either. But lying to certain individuals in certain situations is. And firing Comey doesn't look good. Had that not happened, things probably wouldn't have gotten to where they are now. And sense you seem to know enough about the case to declare that Cohen has nothing, could you fill us in on the other details that haven't been released?
 

tytlyf

Not Religious
I probably would have held my nose and supported the Republican nominee, yes.
Since you're canadian, what's your favorite canadian news channel up there or where you like to get information from? Any canadian websites as well?
 
Top