• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Consciousness in Cavemen? A Debate.

The Neo Nerd

Well-Known Member
So here is a new defense mechanism (i know ive been slack on cataloging them lately, i was still in shock from Mick actually referencing his ideas).

So his new defense mechanism is to change the views that people have refuted. I'm going to call this the "i'm losing so i'm gonna change my ideas" defense.

You know Mick you exhibit every single one of the worst creationist denial tactics and you don't even have the intelligence to see anything wrong with it.

But much like a car crash i just cant look away, the myriad of defense mechanisms and backpedals you utilise is just too damn interesting.
 

mickiel

Well-Known Member
But much like a car crash i just cant look away, the myriad of defense mechanisms and backpedals you utilise is just too damn interesting.


Well thank you, I think defense is just as important as offense. As well as the ability to be interesting to others.

Peace.
 

mickiel

Well-Known Member
I want to head off into a new direction with this and go a little deeper, which may surprise many. Consciousness is not what we generally think it is. It is not involved in the performance of skills and quite often hinders their execution. It need not be involved in speaking, writing, listening or reading. It does not copy down experience, it is not involved in signal learning and is not necessary for making judgements or in simple thinking.

And I want to examine that.

Peace.


Consciousness is not the seat of reason, it has no location in the body except an imaginary one, thus one can conceive that a civilization without Consciousness is possible. In Consciousness, we are never really " Seeing things" in its entirety. This is because such seeing is an analog of actual behavior, and in actual behavior we can only see or pay attention to part of a thing at any one moment.

And I want to go into that.

Peace.
 

mickiel

Well-Known Member
Consciousness is not the seat of reason, it has no location in the body except an imaginary one, thus one can conceive that a civilization without Consciousness is possible. In Consciousness, we are never really " Seeing things" in its entirety. This is because such seeing is an analog of actual behavior, and in actual behavior we can only see or pay attention to part of a thing at any one moment.

And I want to go into that.

Peace.


In Consciousness we always deal with the " Metaphor Me", the analog " I". We can see ourselves flying through the air, or doing whatever we imagine, we always see ourselves as the main figure in the stories of our lives. Consciousness is ever ready to explain anything we find ourselves doing.

And I want to go into that.

Peace.
 

England my lionheart

Rockerjahili Rebel
Premium Member
I have often been accused of not debating, which I disagree with. But I will make a " Conscious effort" to dispute that accusation in this thread. I am interested in Ancient history, and the bible is part of that in my view. I never have believed that civilization is just 2000 years old or that Adam was the first human created. Obviously we had Nenderthal and Cromagnon prehistoric humans, obviously. But its my contention that they couldnot have had Consciousness, as we have it. And I don't think Consciousness is complettely understood.

If God would have given them Consciousness, Civilization would have started with them. Language would have began with them. Mathmatics would have began with them, Government would have began with them, Science would have began with them. None of these things began with them, so I see no way possible they had anything beyond an " Instinctual Consciousness."

Peace.

I disagree,they must have been concious to survive,science must have began with them no matter how rudementory,manipulation of fire for one.
The social groups they had would require conciousness for them to work and there must have been communication for a group to stay together.
 

mickiel

Well-Known Member
I disagree,they must have been concious to survive,science must have began with them no matter how rudementory,manipulation of fire for one.
The social groups they had would require conciousness for them to work and there must have been communication for a group to stay together.


No, God is the key to their survival, not them, themselves. Although they were not aware of it, they existed because of God, and continued because of God, and were eliminated because of God. Human manipulation does not require Consciousness, nor does the ability to work together require Consciousness, Lions are proof of that in their teamwork during the hunt.

I would agree that they must have been able to communicate, albeit without language developed. Animals can do that. Communication does not require Consciousness.

Peace.
 

England my lionheart

Rockerjahili Rebel
Premium Member
No, God is the key to their survival, not them, themselves. Although they were not aware of it, they existed because of God, and continued because of God, and were eliminated because of God. Human manipulation does not require Consciousness, nor does the ability to work together require Consciousness, Lions are proof of that in their teamwork during the hunt.

I would agree that they must have been able to communicate, albeit without language developed. Animals can do that. Communication does not require Consciousness.

Peace.

I would say that their ability to adapt and overcome obstacles was the reason for their survival,as for Lions during a hunt they must be concious of one another for their teamwork to bear fruit.
I think Cave paintings are proof enough of conciousness,this is expressed by their acknowledgement of their surroundings and the importance of their food source
 

mickiel

Well-Known Member
I would say that their ability to adapt and overcome obstacles was the reason for their survival,as for Lions during a hunt they must be concious of one another for their teamwork to bear fruit.
I think Cave paintings are proof enough of conciousness,this is expressed by their acknowledgement of their surroundings and the importance of their food source


I would say that God is the reason for their survival, I deem it impossible for them to have survived the Atmospheric Weather, the horrible animals that existed during their time, and their complette lack of all the things that help and assist in modernday humans survival, by just their " Simple-minded Ability".

I certainly disagree with you there.

Peace.
 

England my lionheart

Rockerjahili Rebel
Premium Member
The San people or Bushmen of the Kalahari desert have lived there for 20,000 years as Hunter gatherers,nothing much has changed in that time,the Kalahari is harsh with little water yet the Bushmen survive which is due to their adaptability to that enviroment just as the inuit adapted to their extreme enviroment.

You say God was responsible for their survival and not their "simple minded ability" yet without their skill in such a harsh enviroment i doubt you or i would survive yet they could easily survive in the UK or US,i guess the question beckons,why would a God make it so difficult to survive yet enable survival.
 

mickiel

Well-Known Member
The San people or Bushmen of the Kalahari desert have lived there for 20,000 years as Hunter gatherers,nothing much has changed in that time,the Kalahari is harsh with little water yet the Bushmen survive which is due to their adaptability to that enviroment just as the inuit adapted to their extreme enviroment.

You say God was responsible for their survival and not their "simple minded ability" yet without their skill in such a harsh enviroment i doubt you or i would survive yet they could easily survive in the UK or US,i guess the question beckons,why would a God make it so difficult to survive yet enable survival.


I think he was preparing the stage of human consciousness yet to come in Adam and his generate.

Peace.
 

England my lionheart

Rockerjahili Rebel
Premium Member
I thought Adam was supposed to be the first Human,Cromagnons are basically us,if you look at the Cave painting of Lescaux in France for example that have been dated to 16,000 years ago shows the great skill required and know how of mixing maganese and Iron Oxide to produce the colours.
 

mickiel

Well-Known Member
I thought Adam was supposed to be the first Human,Cromagnons are basically us,if you look at the Cave painting of Lescaux in France for example that have been dated to 16,000 years ago shows the great skill required and know how of mixing maganese and Iron Oxide to produce the colours.


Adam was the first human with Consciousness, he was not the first human created. I think primordal man dates much farther back than 16,000 years.

Peace.
 

England my lionheart

Rockerjahili Rebel
Premium Member
Adam was the first human with Consciousness, he was not the first human created. I think primordal man dates much farther back than 16,000 years.

Peace.

35,000 years ish further back and displaying conciousness and pretty much as we are now,so if there was an Adam where in this time frame could he have come.
 

mickiel

Well-Known Member
35,000 years ish further back and displaying conciousness and pretty much as we are now,so if there was an Adam where in this time frame could he have come.


I don't really know. It could be anywhere between 14,000 to 24,000, but he had to appear before the Egyptian empire did.

Peace.
 

England my lionheart

Rockerjahili Rebel
Premium Member
In Genesis if i remember correctly Adam was the first and only Human until Eve comes along with no mention of these other Humans that you say lacked conciousness,this is where it makes no sense
 

mickiel

Well-Known Member
In Genesis if i remember correctly Adam was the first and only Human until Eve comes along with no mention of these other Humans that you say lacked conciousness,this is where it makes no sense


Well yes, I think God had discontinued all of Primordal man, and then Created Adam, in his " Image", meaning he gave him Consciousness. Before hand, all humans created by God were not in his Image, or didnot have Consciousness, or the Spirit God put in us that produces Consciousness.

I know its hard to understand, because we do not have complette knowledge of it.

Peace.
 

JustWondering2

Just the facts Ma'am
Quote From: Mickiel
Flame you offer stimulating reasonabl debate , I honor that. Virtually all scientist accept the Big Bang theory which states the entire universe came into existence at a particular point in time when all of the galaxies, stars and plantes were formed, you are correct there.

First off, you have just shown very clearly by the above statement that you either do not understand/know/comprehend what astronomers, not astrologers (by the may do you no the difference) theory of the Big Bang actually states! If you understood it you would not have made such an oversimplified statement or assumption. Speaking of assuming, you do know what you make of yourself when you do so don’t you?
Someone answered you original quote saying something like their background was not in Astronomy. But from reading their post the obviously know a great deal more about genetics than I do and from your response to their statements a Hell of a lot more than you know about the subject. As I said I cannot speak to the genetics side of this thread, but to the Astronomy side of things I certainly can! Considering I have studied and learned as much on the subjects of science, physics and Astronomy for over 45 years now (I’m actually 56). First off Galaxies, Stars and Planets (not plantes) did not magically come into existence at the moment of the Big Bang; neither did atoms of elements of Hydrogen and Helium. Only elemental particles that make up atoms came out of the Big Bang! It was several Million (with an M) years before the temperature of the expanding space became cool enough for matter as we know it to exist (the elements H & He) and it wasn’t until that time that Stars and Galaxies could even exist. Let me stop here for a moment and ask you a question. Do you have a clue as to how all of the elements heavier than H & He on the periodic table were formed and come from and don’t say God made them, because that’s not what I’m asking? The Physics of how they came into being. OK I’ll go ahead and give you the simple version “at the core of stars” by the process of Nuclear Fusion. Now that being said do you know what fusion is? OK the simple version again just for you. At the center of a star lighter elements are fused together to form heavier elements and in the process energy is release, up to the formation of the element Iron. With each step, lighter element to next heaviest, more and more energy (in the case in the form of pressure and heat) is required to set off the fusion process and more and more is released as well up to Iron. Once a star starts producing Iron at it core it days/years are numbered. Because a star is a constant battle between gravity trying to crush all the mass of the star in on itself and the energy produced at the stars core from fusion creating heat and outward pressure. See where I’m going here? I doubt it, so here goes, simple version again, shortly after the star begins producing Iron at it core the immense gravity of it mass and the lack of pressure (from fusion of iron) causes the star to collapse on it’s self. Now I’ll stop here for a moment and review a minute, first off we have the Big Bang (everything from nothing, what a concept! Sound like God to you it does to me?), elemental particles, 75%H/25%He, stars then heavier elements from the stars core. With me so far, huh? Back to elements again, so far we have talked about all that fall on the periodic table between H and Iron. OK when a star such as I have described gets to the point of making Iron and subsequently collapses on to itself and explodes into a Super Nova that blows most of the outer layers of the star out into the surrounding space with lots and lots of energy! Not someplace you would want to be anywhere near when it happens. Now I left one key point out of my above explanation. The star’s mass when it is initially formed (how much of it the star has) determines everything about the star. Some small stars will never go past Helium or carbon and will end their live in a different fashion than the one I have described above. Among the characteristics the initial mass of the star determines is it’s surface temp, color, size, density and importantly it’s life span and how it will die. Still with me so far? Lots of mass makes a bigger, hotter, more dense star that’s color is on the Blue side of the electromagnetic spectrum or sorry do you know what that is? If not google it I’ll not try and explain that to you. The less mass the star starts out with the smaller, cooler (relatively speaking), less dense and the more shifted to the red end of the spectrum. More importantly, at least to the age of the Earth and star’s, the larger a star (more massive) starts out as the shorter it life span! The smaller the longer the life span. This goes from a few Million years for the most massive stars to 100’s of billions of years for the smallest (red Dwarf) stars. OK still with me? So the older the star the redder and smaller it is and it shines for a very long time, the larger the mass the Bluer the star appears and the faster it burns up its available fuel. Ok you say what about our sun (star). Well it set’s pretty much in the middle of it all size wise. So pretty long lived 30-50 billion years and pretty much yellow in color. Oh and too small and incapable (by a long shot) of making Iron at its core.
OK all that being said, another question for you. Do have any clue as to what our blood is a compound of? Wait for it…..Iron! Wow how surprising is that? So what does that say in general about the age of our sun (compared to the rest of the universe) and where one of the most abundant elements on the earth came from? OK I know your scratching you head and don’t have a clue what I’m talking about so I’ll tell you. All of the heavy elements on this Earth (solar system as well) came from another star that lived and died and seeded our solar system long before our sun ever came into existence! Not years not 10’s of thousands of years, not even Millions, Billions of years before our sun formed in it’s present location there was a much, much larger super giant of a star in our neighborhood lived out it’s life and died out.
Bottom line is this my friend. There is no single creation event (other than the Big Bang and by the way I think that was God’s work) where all the stars and all the galaxies were formed all at once!! Period, don’t believe me I suggest you take an Astronomy class and perhaps some simple physics as well! If you do I assure you if you do and you learn even the simplest of the laws of physics and astronomy I will open your eyes to the truth and perhaps you will stop worshipping the Bible and begin worshiping God in all his glory. Physics is mans way of learning a small fraction of God’s rules that control the universe!
 
Top