Could Nothingness Be Another Dimension In And Of Itself?

[Runewolf1973]

If you have any further questions, if I may, I'll direct you to Outhouse. He's the only man in the world I know that is omniscient, can visibly see the entire universe with no imagination, and whose sources are 100% all knowing, infallible, and all factual and up for zero debate or reform.

Outhouse was merely presenting the facts as was I.

 

[Runewolf1973]

And do you see gravity as a force or not a force? Einstein in particular, didn't see gravity as a force.

It is what it is...a fundamental constituent of the universe

 

[Runewolf1973]

Of course, and all I am saying is that it's light/energy that interacts with matter but is really one and the same and not separate. If the hippocampus and Claustrum were removed from a brain, it would just be "dead matter" with no energetic animation. All I'm saying is the memory/information/knowledge, etc. is all stored in packets of light quanta that the material parts of the brain and body can interpret on a physical plane of existence.

There is no such thing as "dead", "conscious", "living", or "intelligent" matter. Matter is interactive.

 

[Unification]

Outhouse was merely presenting the facts as was I.

Where did those facts that there is nothing invisible to the eye, or that everything in the universe has mass come from?

 

[Runewolf1973]

Did those four forces come from one source? If everything is energy, the four forces can be unified into one source. If the four forces all broke down back to their original void, would that be pure energy or pure light?

It would be a Unified Field.

 

[Runewolf1973]

Where did those facts that there is nothing invisible to the eye, or that everything in the universe has mass come from?

Not sure. I don't recall him saying that, nor would I agree with those statements.

 

[Unification]

Not sure. I don't recall him saying that, nor would I agree with those statements.

Well, I tried to visibly see my imagination but it was invisible.

I also tried to put my imagination on a scale to see if it had mass, but couldn't.

I'd love for him to present the facts that I can do such things.

 

[Runewolf1973]

Well, I tried to visibly see my imagination but it was invisible.

I also tried to put my imagination on a scale to see if it had mass, but couldn't.

I'd love for him to present the facts that I can do such things.

I view imagination or thought as an interactive process.

 

[Unification]

I view imagination or thought as an interactive process.

Lol, I would have never guessed.

I admire your simplicity. In all honesty, it's best to leave it at that and experience the complex interactions rather than have knowledge of them.

 

[godnotgod]

I am afraid humanity has fallen into a deep sleep, causing them to mistake the menu for the meal. As Maharishi Mahesh Yogi used to say:

'The description is not the described'

 

[godnotgod]

I view imagination or thought as an interactive process.

Is Love also the property of an unconscious, electro-chemical material interaction?

 

[Rick O'Shez]

In all honesty, it's best to leave it at that and experience the complex interactions rather than have knowledge of them.

Experience is knowledge. Imaginings are just imaginings, pseudo-science is just pseudo-science and beliefs are just beliefs.

 

[Rick O'Shez]

Omniscient: where is all of the knowledge/instruction/intelligence of the infinite/finite universe stored?

In the brains of sentient beings and devices created by them.

Omnipotent: Every bit of matter in the physical universe is created by the power of light.

It's created in stars, isn't it? Stars also create light of course.

Again you are trying to reify light and make it your god, ignoring all evidence to the contrary. Why this need to reify?

 

[Runewolf1973]

Is Love also the property of an unconscious, electro-chemical material interaction?

Yes, absolutely.

 

[Rick O'Shez]

 

[Tumah]

Thanks for the reply. Say if we had a ball surrounded by nothing...complete empty space or vacuum...perhaps that "absence of something" is an actual other reality or dimension which without those other physical dimensions of that ball would not be visible.

A completely empty vaccum is not nothinginess, that's still a spatial dimension.
The absence of everything would need to lack space as well, wouldn't it?

 

[godnotgod]

Yes, absolutely.

Nyet!

 

[Rick O'Shez]

 

[YmirGF]

*SNORT*

 

[Papoon]

Do you mean you have stilled the mind? Or something else?

Something else. State of mind irrelevant. Stilling the mind may have been a prerequisite, to notice, but like the sky it is not contingent on presence or absence of clouds. Almost impossible to say anything sensible about it really. I am now thinking I should have said nothing, because I have no way of making what I mean comprehensible. I certainty don't understand it. I think I was wondering if anyone else might recognise what I mean.