Science backs its theories with proof to the extent possible today. Research is on for the rest and it is finding new things on a daily basis. Scriptures do not provide any proof and are stalled in BCE or 7th Century.
If you would care, read this:
Ask Astro Does dark energy create the voids between galaxy clusters?
The main problem is not actually with creation, but with an explanation for the existence of -and possibility of -a creator.
Most would say that a creator could not simply exist and then create everything else -and that is understandable.
Biblical scripture actually does contain a logical explanation for God's existence, but not in modern language.
Quite simply, the bible actually indicates that God EVOLVED (in the broadest sense of the word).
In other words... a creator/creativity (necessarily) developed first -making an extremely-purposefully-complex creation possible. Everything became initially-simple creator and initially-simple environment all in one -becoming more complex together interdependently. God created all by arrangement of what "He" was.-by becoming increasingly capable and responsible.
What is apparent to us -reverse-engineering ONLY back to the singularity -is that all which preceded us did not require a creator -because a creator is not apparently included in what is considered -and it is generally assumed both that the singularity and the universe it produced was/is the sum of all -and nothing preceded it.
For the most part, the production of the universe was automatic, but little focus has been on why or how the universe initiated.
From our own example -at our level -in an already-extremely-complex environment, we see that nature alone is capable of only so much -then creativity is required to make more states possible.
That principle is true at any level, but we do not perceive a previous/more simple/more basic level than our own.
We do not perceive that there would be room for such before the initiation of our universe.
We do not have an explanation for why greatest possible simplicity would become our universe specifically -and it is often assumed that the singularity must have been greatest possible simplicity.
However... the singularity must not have been very simple at all. It must have been exactly complex and specific enough to transform what was into specifically what is. It must have been more like a seed at the point of the singularity -but no explanation is offered for the development of the seed
Between greatest possible simplicity and such extremely-purposeful-complexity and specificity as the singularity (there being the "room" for a creator), the usual suspect is creativity.
"EVOLUTION" in its broadest sense is self-development.
All things developing into a "SELF" first is far more logical than not -and would be perfectly natural.
Furthermore, if we define "self", we see that it is the necessary processor.
Personality aside, a self is able to understand what is -and make it what it otherwise could not become -and would cause it to become suited to itself and its developing psychology.
