Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
The crossbeam served a purpose. That they used a crosspiece is historical. You seem to believe that they used just a pole. Why do you believe that?I doubt the Romans would use unnecessary wood, but the conclusion is up to you, also based on the terminology and subsequent translations. More that you talk about it the more convinced I am that whatever was construed as a crossbeam was the sign, unless you have some evidence to the contrary, and I'm talking about images or artists' depictions.