Unveiled Artist
Veteran Member
I've read your posts. There are many flaws in your logic.
It can't be illogical based on your personal views on the topic. Logical flaws are independent of that. Could you give an example?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I've read your posts. There are many flaws in your logic.
The nonsense you keep saying about how someone who doesn't know whether they've been exposed to the virus isn't putting others at risk comes immediately to mind.It can't be illogical based on your personal views on the topic. Logical flaws are independent of that. Could you give an example?
Which city is that?
I know the D variant has not reached everywhere in the USA yet. but where it has it is extremely virulent.
The nonsense you keep saying about how someone who doesn't know whether they've been exposed to the virus isn't putting others at risk comes immediately to mind.
Yeah... I see your analogy as nonsense, and not applicable to the reality of the pandemic.Oh. I'm thinking of another way to put it because I get what you guys are saying but its misapplied.
I'll use a gun example (I used a couple times)
If I told you I had a gun (unvaccinated-if you like) of course you will "feel" like your life is in danger. It's a physiological response to perceived threat.
If I pulled at a gun and put it to your head then you Are at danger regardless how you feel about the issue.
It's a technicality between "assumption" of risk and actually being in danger for your life.
Yeah... I see your analogy as nonsense, and not applicable to the reality of the pandemic.
Columbus, OHWhich city is that?
I know the D variant has not reached everywhere in the USA yet. but where it has it is extremely virulent.
If you say so.And people have been preparing for this discrimination against anti government folk. It’s discrimination against people who don’t comply to tyranny. Vaxxers are a bunch of statists
Read the edited version of my post.Objectively, it is not. Whether it's a war, genocide, pandemic, or something less serious the fact is you're not in danger-it's all perceived.
If a person doesn't have COVID, you're technically not in danger. You don't Know it, of course, hence the emotional reaction.
Not by choice, but I can't control who I have to be around at work.Another way to put it is if an unvaccinated person was tested negative to COVID would you be around that person?
Do you realize that, with these 3 points:Do you sanitise everything that comes into your home.
do you never touch anything outside.
If you can even smell tobacco smoke you are close enough to catch covid.
Sounds like a plan to me,If you say so.
But most folks here disagree with you. 75% of all mature adults have received two Covid vaccinations.
You do it your way, we will do it ours.
Hopefully they will feel a sense of responsibility and do the responsible thing to help stop the virus and protect others. I watched that video, and I agreed 100% with what Biden said in it. It's refreshing to hear the hard, but compassionate truth of this. At this point, making masks and vaccine political, is utterly irresponsible and even evil. It results in needless deaths.But, in general though, I don't know how unvaccinated people feel when they are told they will spread the virus in every nook and cranny.
Even calling it "The pandemic of the unvaccinated"
It's sad. It's early morning here but I look forward to the replies.
Hopefully they will feel a sense of responsibility and do the responsible thing to help stop the virus and protect others. I watched that video, and I agreed 100% with what Biden said in it. It's refreshing to hear the hard, but compassionate truth of this. At this point, making masks and vaccine political, is utterly irresponsible and even evil. It results in needless deaths.
Nice attempt to scare me, but it's not working. I go by what I can see and there's little evidence of a deadly highly contagious disease burning through my city, from what I see. (Yes, my city. I live in the middle of a rather large city and work full time at a supermarket. I'm not one of the shut ins on this board.)
So if Covid is a machine gun, it's a rather lackluster one I would return to the manufacturer for a refund.
Which city is that?
I know the D variant has not reached everywhere in the USA yet. but where it has it is extremely virulent.
The disease has killed more than a thousand people in Columbus.Columbus, OH
They have discovered that even those who have been infected previously, can get it again. Plus there are other strains even more virulent than the previous one, such as Delta variant. It may be as time shows, that we may need additional shots to help stave it off.I'm not sure why they need to be?.....a corona virus can only be dealt with by our immune system. Once we have the necessary antibodies, we will recover and our immune system will not let us get a serious dose of that virus again because the antibodies in our bloodstream are there for life and should take care of it pretty quickly.
What makes us think that is the science. It is different. Here's a link to help bring some credible knowledge to this.But with the seasonal flu shots....don't people need a new one every year?....every new strain of flu needs a new fluvax....right? What makes us think this flu will be any different?
They're including Franklin County in that number and there's over 1.3 million people in Franklin County and almost a 1 million in the city itself. I don't know any of these people, and hundreds of them are probably elderly people in nursing homes.The disease has killed more than a thousand people in Columbus.
https://public.tableau.com/app/prof...tbreakSummary_15918845768300/COVID19Summaryp1
- you have a gun. You aren't sure whether it's loaded.
- you didn't load the gun yourself, but you know that people in your community have been sneaking bullets into unloaded guns without the owners knowing.
- every person you meet, you greet them by pointing the gun at them and pulling the trigger.
- you assume that your gun is still unloaded, but you never bother to check.
Not by choice, but I can't control who I have to be around at work.
A COVID test only tells you that, as of the date of the test, the person didn't have enough virus in their nose to trigger a positive result.
It means (within the precision and sensitivity of the test) that they didn't have a full-blown COVID-19 infection on the day of the test. It tells me almost nothing about whether they were just in the beginning stages of a COVID-19 infection on the day of the test, and absolutely nothing about whether they've been exposed to the virus since the test.
In general, if someone I'm encountering in public or at work is unvaccinated because they're refusing the vaccine, I would take this as evidence that their judgment about the disease is poor, and therefore that I can't count on them having taken reasonable measures to avoid exposure to the virus.
1,706 in Franklin County.They're including Franklin County in that number and there's over 1.3 million people in Franklin County and almost a 1 million in the city itself. I don't know any of these people, and hundreds of them are probably elderly people in nursing homes.
He did not call it the "pandemic against the vaccinated". You even put the correct quote in your original post. The actual quote is "The pandemic of the unvaccinated". This "against the vaccinated" only appears in this post, not even your first post. You're misinterpreting his words in recalling them.The questions were for unvaccinated. The point of the video wasn't to disagree with his message but just the point of calling it the "pandemic against the vaccinated" makes me question whether I should take his message seriously insofar that he would segregate a group of people as the cause of the pandemic.
He did not call it the "pandemic against the vaccinated". You even put the correct quote in your original post. The actual quote is "The pandemic of the unvaccinated". This "against the vaccinated" only appears in this post, not even your first post. You're misinterpreting his words in recalling them.
It is in fact, "The pandemic of the unvaccinated", for the very simple reason is that unvaccinated people are the ones in the vast majority of cases the only ones getting it and dying from it. And it is in fact "the pandemic of the unvaccinated" for the fact that that's how the pandemic spreads - through unvaccinated people.
If everyone were vaccinated, there would be no Covid anymore. It would become extinct without host bodies to keep it going. The "unvaccinated" keep it alive. Covid lives because it has unprotected hosts. That's 100% accurate, isn't it?