Debate 3

[Kuzcotopia]

No, Wikileaks is a threat to law breakers. Wikileaks is a threat to Hillary Clinton. I seriously doubt that Wikileaks would divulge information that threatens the national security of our nation, but they have every right, in my opinion to expose criminals and liars like Hillary Clinton.

K.

 

[Aštra’el]

Yeah, "Dems" are fine because the conspiracy runs deep, throughout the whole party. You are all willing to deny the truth and even lie to let the whore of Babylon ride the beast.

The allegory and metaphors behind the Revelations story about the whore of Babylon and the beast with seven heads and ten horns have naught to do with Hillary Clinton.

 

[Sonofason]

The allegory and metaphors behind the Revelations story about the whore of Babylon and the beast with seven heads and ten horns have naught to do with Hillary Clinton.

Yeah, so you say.

 

[idav]

@idav No conspiracy theories at all, she was shipping weapons to what became ISIS to oust Assad. What planet are you from where that is OK? Obama admitted this, and so did she. Tin foil hat off.

The whole "hillary created ISIS" thing is quite amusing. I heard Trump say that in this third debate but gotta say it sounds pretty silly.

It's more accurate to say that Trump is an independent that stole the nomination via a populist movement.

Whatever helps you sleep at night. I realize that Trump will get the bigot votes from both parties but they are a minority in this country, thank goodness. Though his spouting of lies may dupe the uninformed, the first debate was enough for Hillary to clinch the lead. Trump has not been able to recover and even the tape scandal hadn't really made a difference because people seemed to already have already decided by then. However it does seem Trump lost some more votes in this third debate. Not by any conspiracy that Dems have going, its Trumps own mouth and lack of class getting him in trouble.

 

[idav]

You are all willing to deny the truth and even lie to let the whore of Babylon ride the beast.

Trump makes a much better anti-christ than Hillary. He's the only true atheist who has made it this close to being president.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Well, I hope you're right. But I don't think you are.

At any given time, someone is always saying it's the end. But it never is.

 

[Lighthouse]

I don't know if that needs to be that the father is part of the decision, but notified... certainly... We're trying to decide whether we found the girl of our dreams, and this would be something important to know. I'd like to know it before I go to divorce court and lose half of my stuff.

Suddenly, equality doesn't seem so in certain scenario's.

 

[Lighthouse]

She's probably the worst thing on this planet next to Soros. If we could get these two on a plane and shoot it down with a missile the world would experience something sort of like the Age of Enlightenment. It'd be amazing...

@idav No conspiracy theories at all, she was shipping weapons to what became ISIS to oust Assad. What planet are you from where that is OK? Obama admitted this, and so did she. Tin foil hat off. The Republicans didn't pick Trump, but please keep saying that because that makes it true. The Republican party doesn't work like a dictatorship, so there is a process where citizens can affect the outcome. It's more accurate to say that Trump is an independent that stole the nomination via a populist movement. Democrats don't even care what your pick for the nomination is and fail, yet again, lol.

Sometimes what many call conspiracy theories, are just common sense and not being guillable or naive.

 

[Mindmaster]

Sense Trump doesn't even have the basic credentials to be president never been in the military and knows nothing about it I'm shocked beyond belief that Republicans chose Trump I first heard he was running I thought it was a joke laughed about it. I still think hes a joke.

There is literally no job that prepares you to be a President other than actually being the President. It's nothing like any other job, and no one can really fill those shoes 100%. Being in the military has no relevance, and neither does anything else you say. Was Ronald Reagan qualified? (actor) Was George Bush? (CIA goon) Was Bill Clinton? (Draft dodger.) Obama? (Never had a straight up job in his life, spent many years just drifting around and getting high. Got involved with radical community groups, and got involved in the Democratic party through them.)

The last three Presidents that had military service were: Reagan, G. H. Bush, and G. W. Bush. Republicans are more likely to serve, and the last Democrat was Jimmy Carter. If military service is important voting Democrat is sort of silly, but I find it notable besides Trump, Mitt Romney was the only other non-military candidate in recent history that became a Republican nominee.

 

[Scuba Pete]

If we could get these two on a plane and shoot it down

Violence is a typical hatriotic response to anything the Republicans don't like. They hate abortions but they embrace murdering anyone who stands in their way.

 

[Mindmaster]

Violence is a typical hatriotic response to anything the Republicans don't like. They hate abortions but they embrace murdering anyone who stands in their way.

Good thing I don't consider myself a Republican. Anyway, I would reject anything Hillary and the current DNC are involved in even if I was a Democrat, because corruption is corruption and I'm not blind. I'm more of an ultimate good type guy -- just like killing Hitler was a good move... I'm pretty sure removing Soros and his supporters is the same. Millions of people have died from Soros' direct actions, and if Hillary is in with him she can go too.

 

[Scuba Pete]

 

[Mindmaster]

Deleted content edited out.

Oh, like these "lies"?

See the thing about calling someone a liar is the onus is on you to provide the proof, similarly the establishment Republicans hate Trump. Either provide something to back what you say, because you've over-generalized quite a bit, or continue to fall down the deep rabbit hole. I don't hate anything, so keep making that strawman. Do you have anything to really add to this conversation or is it just about me, because that's against the rules here?

 

[Mindmaster]

The whole "hillary created ISIS" thing is quite amusing. I heard Trump say that in this third debate but gotta say it sounds pretty silly.

-snipped irrelevant comments-

I realize that Trump will get the bigot votes from both parties but they are a minority in this country, thank goodness..

You're not bigoted if they want to kill you, if you can explain why it''s OK for them to feel it's alright to kill people then maybe you have a point that someone is a bigot, or over-reacting. They want everyone in the USA dead or as slaves, so figure that out . However, it's in nearly every page of the Quran and it is a defect of the entire religion. It's not "peaceful" until it receives a reform:

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/violence.aspx

It's in their book, it's not my fault or anyone else's that it is there, but you have to simply be gullible to ignore it. I don't advocate violence against anyone for their religious beliefs, but I won't be assaulted for them either. I think blocking them completely out of the USA keeps them from getting hurt as much as it does us. It's the peaceful solution, at least until we have some way to sort it out. Right now, no one does, and Obama is just letting them in for some silly feel-good agenda. Sorry, I can't go with that especially with the history of these regions. Many people here are happy to get onto the liberal gravy train and say that none of this is true, but there is more evidence backing up this notion than any feel-good idealism. Idealism has no place when a group of people wants you slaughtered, and they think they're going to heaven because they did it. What can you give them that they will value more than Allah's blessing in the afterlife? These people are used to living in third world conditions and have zero attachment to goods or benefits... You can't buy them out of this type of radicalism. Muslims cannot refuse to abide by the Quran, so please tell me how they do not somehow support most of this?

The people here are quick to make comments which argue with the facts, but offer no alternative solution. You can live in peace only if the company you keep is willing to work for it.

 

[Notanumber]

Is this what you want in the USA?

Open borders, who needs them!

 

[Scuba Pete]

I don't hate anything,

Earlier you suggested that we should send up Clinton and Trump in the same plane only to shoot them down with a missle. Wasn't that you? That's pretty hateful.

See the thing about calling someone a liar is the onus is on you to provide the proof,

O rly? So where's the onus when you call Clinton a liar and a crook? If you don't present credible evidence, which you haven't, then I conclude that you are in error. Since you've already demonstrated malice, then the error becomes a lie.

Oh, like these "lies"?

I must admit to turning off this drivel after only 10/15 seconds. The media only favors the media. The candidates have the right to remain silent when presented with sensationalistic crap like wikileaks or even Billy Bush's Bus tape. Clinton gave it the time it deserved: nothing, nada and squat. On the other hand, Trump just can't help running his mouth, making his story inflate in importance and eat up time. The more he whines the more the media covers it because it ups their ratings. Whose at fault? Not the media, but the narcissist who's playing into their hands.

 

[Mindmaster]

Earlier you suggested that we should send up Clinton and Trump in the same plane only to shoot them down with a missle. Wasn't that you? That's pretty hateful..

Misquoting for an all new post low. It was Soros and Hillary, and just a lament about how bad they are. You take it to hyperbole and make it into some serious issue. Your defect, not mine, as if it would ever happen. Nice work, gumshoe.

Disliking two people for what they've done to hurt others doesn't give any credence to the idea that I lack morality, but nice try. Both of their body counts are well documented, and you probably can operate Google to find out more, which I suggest you do.

Your argument is like: Because the gazelle dislikes being eaten it hates the lion. Illogical nonsense, period. Non sequitur.

 

[Scuba Pete]

Misquoting for an all new post low.

Misquote? MISQUOTE??? You're just another Trump, not able to take responsibility for your words. Here's what you wrote>>>

If we could get these two on a plane and shoot it down

Both of their body counts are well documented,

Prove it or admit you're a liar. I mean, really prove it. You don't get to use the ultra right gossip mills as evidence.

But you can't and you won't. You're too much a Republican to be able to do this. You're all bluster and talk.

 

[Kirran]

Is this what you want in the USA?

Open borders, who needs them!

You get bizarre views of the UK from across the Atlantic. In what way is Sadiq Khan a terrorist?

 

[Scuba Pete]

You get bizarre views of the UK from across the Atlantic. In what way is Sadiq Khan a terrorist?

These simply support and feed his delusions along with his bias. Kahn's name sounds scary so the white wingers allude to him being a terrorist and the sheeple simply follow along. Don't ask them to support their outrageous theories with actual evidence. That's not what sheeple do. They can only spew the koolaid they drank in hopes that you'll drink it too.

It's peculiar, but Trump also attacked the Khans and mocked them for their religion. It seems that their son giving his life for our country doesn't make them patriots.