sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
canaanite worship is far removes from true worship. and the true God does not want his people to be involved with pagan things, and that has always been the case .
(Exodus 33:2) And I will send an angel ahead of you and drive out the Ca´naan·ites, the Am´or·ites, and the Hit´tites and the Per´iz·zites, the Hi´vites and the Jeb´u·sites;
(Joshua 3:10) After that Joshua said: "By this YOU will know that a living God is in YOUR midst, and that he will without fail drive away from before YOU the Ca´naan·ites and the Hit´tites and the Hi´vites and the Per´iz·zites and the Gir´ga·****es and the Am´or·ites and the Jeb´u·sites.
(Deuteronomy 7:1) "When Jehovah your God at last brings you into the land to which you are going so as to take possession of it, he must also clear away populous nations from before you, the Hit´tites and the Gir´ga·****es and the Am´or·ites and the Ca´naan·ites and the Per´iz·zites and the Hi´vites and the Jeb´u·sites, seven nations more populous and mighty than you are.......................
Our best archaeological placement of the invasion of Canaan is ca. 1250 b.c.e. If Joshua and Judges are true, then they would corroborate the story. However, Judges does not corroborate Joshua. Joshua states that the conquest was total, and that Jerusalem was captured. Judges states in 1:1-20 that the conquest was not total, and that Jerusalem was burned. However, Judges 1:21-36 states that the conquest was only partial, and that Jerusalem was not captured. II Samuel 5 corroborates Judges 1:21-36.
There is no burn layer in Jerusalem from that time period. There is nothing in the archaeological record to indicate an invasion of an ethnically different group. There are no extra-Biblical corroborative writings.
This is not an ivasion, it's not a mass immigration. Israel is not a distinctive social group, but revolutionized Canaanites, showing a different theological ideology.
However, what is evident in the archaeological record is that Canaanite worship and Hebrew worship practices were not significantly different from each other.
Philip Davies (University of Sheffield) asserts that Ezra and Nehemiah came from Babylonia in the mid-400's with a copy of the Torah. What we now have in the Pentateuch is invented history, brought to Jerusalem from the Persian beaurocrats who have come to rule the strategic area around Jerusalem. Abraham was from the Shiite region of moder Iraq. How convenient that we now have a story that says to the local people, "Your God, YHWH, gave us this land." This whole story is Persian imperial propaganda, to justify their claims over this area of land.
Whether Davies is completely correct or not, it certainly fits with what we know from the archaeological record.
The Canaanite creator-god, El, is the same El from which the name "Jehovah" is derived (in conjunction with the Hebrew name YHWH.)