• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Democrats had better not even think of it.

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
Please, tell me more about how black people's lives don't matter.
For some reason, my posts defending myself against this slander have apparently been deleted but this remains. I just want to say that this is a grievous misrepresentation of my views and I never once expressed such a view.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
What distortion? If you disput their findings, please provide accurate ones?

Some of those crimes were not motivated by extremism thus report contains distortions and lies. For example "Lafayette, Indiana, January 16, 2017. Wesley Andrew Hampton, a self-declared white supremacist, and another defendant allegedly robbed and murdered a man in a home invasion." The crime was not motivated by white supremacy and his partner in crime was a black guy. Ergo a false representation of the motivate in order to manufacture an extremist based crime.

https://www.jconline.com/story/news...te-shooting-suspects-charged-murder/97033940/

You can check the rest if you are interested.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Some of those crimes were not motivated by extremism thus report contains distortions and lies. For example "Lafayette, Indiana, January 16, 2017. Wesley Andrew Hampton, a self-declared white supremacist, and another defendant allegedly robbed and murdered a man in a home invasion." The crime was not motivated by white supremacy and his partner in crime was a black guy. Ergo a false representation of the motivate in order to manufacture an extremist based crime.

Lafayette shooting suspects charged with murder

You can check the rest if you are interested.
A white supremacist black guy.
Reminds me of Vonnegut's "Mother Night".
(Helluva tragicomedy.)
 

Kangaroo Feathers

Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
I just call it as I see it. Why do you think it's distorted? Are you Antifa yourself and do the same things they do? If so, you're free to clarify and correct whatever distortions I may be making. If not, then how do you know any more than I do about them?
Aren't YOU antifa??
 

The Emperor of Mankind

Currently the galaxy's spookiest paraplegic
It's definitely a possibility. We've already had a Republican politician shot for political reasons, and cops being gunned down in this atmosphere of out of control visceral hatred of the police being fostered by lunatic far-leftists who feel emboldened by BLM nonsense. There doesn't seem to be an end in sight or limit to it.

If anything I'd say it's the increasing perception that police officers can get away with blatantly murdering black suspects in their custody that is causing people to lose faith in law enforcement. Maybe if the police were to stop gunning down unarmed or subdued black people/suspects this might go some way to improving both their reputation and relations with minority communities?

Not to mention there's an alarming rise in the number of white Americans calling the police on black Americans for non-issues which, in light of the above, puts their lives at risk for no reason.
 

Sleeppy

Fatalist. Christian. Pacifist.
Some of those crimes were not motivated by extremism thus report contains distortions and lies. For example "Lafayette, Indiana, January 16, 2017. Wesley Andrew Hampton, a self-declared white supremacist, and another defendant allegedly robbed and murdered a man in a home invasion." The crime was not motivated by white supremacy and his partner in crime was a black guy. Ergo a false representation of the motivate in order to manufacture an extremist based crime.

https://www.jconline.com/story/news...te-shooting-suspects-charged-murder/97033940/

You can check the rest if you are interested.

From the article:

Hampton, however, requested a new court to oversee his case because, he said, Judge Thomas Busch is not sympathetic to his white supremacist views.

Hampton seems to think his views were relevant.
 

Acer21

New Member
Rand Paul warns of 'assassination' peril after Kavanaugh confirmation: 'I really worry someone is going to be killed'

Even Rand Paul is voicing concerns.

Has the Democrat Party gone this far over the edge that they become a credible threat?



Has your imagination gone too far? You are essentially accusing the "Democrats" (the entire Democratic Party as a whole, or one lone Democrat is not clarified) of assasinating someone, when such an assassination has not happened (or even almost happened, nor even discussed by party leaders).
 

Sleeppy

Fatalist. Christian. Pacifist.
This is just a smear against the judge so Hampton's lawyer can claim the case had a biased judge. Nothing you cited is about motive.

Not sure why anyone would consider that a smear against the judge... Sympathy for white supremacy would be bias, not the adverse.

The motive was spice. That's obvious. What supported the motive (resistance) to kill the guy they were robbing? According to the shooter himself, white supremacy played a role.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
Not sure why anyone would consider that a smear against the judge... Sympathy for white supremacy would be bias, not the adverse.

It is a smear against the judge's ability to remain bias free in court on the ground the judge is not neutral. Bias is not merely confined to things one supports but includes things one objects to.

The motive was spice. That's obvious. What supported the motive (resistance) to kill the guy they were robbing? According to the shooter himself, white supremacy played a role.

No it was drugs.

The shooter never claimed this.
 

Sleeppy

Fatalist. Christian. Pacifist.
It is a smear against the judge's ability to remain bias free in court on the ground the judge is not neutral. Bias is not merely confined to things one supports but includes things one objects to.



No it was drugs.

The shooter never claimed this.

1) False. But, 'Not sympathetic' ≠ 'objects to'.
2) The shooter brought it up in relation to his case. What would be the point in doing so, if it was was not related to the case?
 

Shad

Veteran Member
1) False. But, 'Not sympathetic' ≠ 'objects to'.

Wrong. Bias can be for or against supportive or rejection of. Hampton's lawyer is trying to use the "objection to" of the judge as a bias against Hampton. It is a lawyer's trick using the slimiest evidence to claim a bias.

2) The shooter brought it up in relation to his case.

In regards to the judge not motive or did you not read what you cited?

What would be the point in doing so, if it was was not related to the case?

A mistrial. Prejudice is a grounds for a mistrial. Hence why I said it was a lawyer's trick.
 

Sleeppy

Fatalist. Christian. Pacifist.
Wrong. Bias can be for or against supportive or rejection of. Hampton's lawyer is trying to use the "objection to" of the judge as a bias against Hampton. It is a lawyer's trick using the slimiest evidence to claim a bias.



In regards to the judge not motive or did you not read what you cited?



A mistrial. Prejudice is a grounds for a mistrial. Hence why I said it was a lawyer's trick.

1) If the judge had sympathy for Hampton's white supremacist views, what would that be? An unbiased position? Pretty naive.

2) Nope. Lack of prejudice is not grounds for mistrial. They brought it up in relation to the crime. They didn't bring up his ideological feelings about pets.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Has your imagination gone too far? You are essentially accusing the "Democrats" (the entire Democratic Party as a whole, or one lone Democrat is not clarified) of assasinating someone, when such an assassination has not happened (or even almost happened, nor even discussed by party leaders).
When you have elected officials encouraging to ramp up confrontation, it's essentially a indirect rally cry to all the nutcases to go out and do something extreme .
 

Lyndon

"Peace is the answer" quote: GOD, 2014
Premium Member
Yeah, like we have trump encouraging violence against reporters!!
 
Top