stacey bo bacey
oh no you di'int
This thread is going to make me throw up.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
This thread is going to make me throw up.
This is me on the cover of my High School graduation program in 1984, at 18 years of age.
Right, so we are at a dead end. I should hold myself to my own standard.No, I'm not done! I haven't been on in awhile...
I do have a legitimate question, FFH. You know how you say we can't prove earth is however many billion years old because there are no witnesses? Well, no one was around even 13,000 years ago to witness it. You say there is "written record" but that was recorded after the fact. By men. Who also wrote a bunch of other stuff (that isn't to be taken completely literally in a lot of cases). So I'm just wondering why you accept the age of 13,000 years when there wasn't actual witnessing, just written "record"?
It keeps life interesting.Anyhoo, you have definitely thrown me for a loop, FFH. You're definitely nutty...but then again, so am I! Just nutty in a different way, I think....
I can be reformed, and can become more refined, give me time.:sad4: It's always the hot ones.
No, but the gemstones have been analyzed by jewelers. One of the diamonds is an 11.5 carat, or somethng like that, which doesn't exist in this world. The jewelers could not put a price on them because the cuts on these diamonds were not made by human hands, no flaws in them and the quality of the gemstones are beyond what they've ever seen.Well do they have video record of them falling from the sky? Or just people saying they saw it?
Okay, sorry I missed this, yeah I realize you need further proof. I'll keep my eyes out on the net, stuff like this keeps popping up with more frequency. There's bound to be something that will surface eventually that will be harder to refute.Obvious hoax to deceive and fleece the desperate and gullible. Instead of some cheap parlor tricks, how about your god do some real miracles such as cure a hospital full of terminally ill children or make food marvelously appear to feed starving children in Africa? Or rescue children from abusive environments? Or bring world peace? Why not something deeply profound and beneficial instead of some lame trick? Your god's supposed powers are rather weak and underwhelming (i.e.the cheap tricks of a conman preacher). I could hire a birthday party magician to perform more convincing stunts.
No, but the gemstones have been analyzed by jewelers. One of the diamonds is an 11.5 carrot, or somethng like that, which doesn't exist in this world. The jewelers could not put a price on them because the cuts on these diamonds were not made by human hands, no flaws in them and the quality of the gemstones are beyond what they've ever seen.
There is also oil (which smells of roses) flowing from his Bible with no apparent source.
No, I'm not done! I haven't been on in awhile...
I do have a legitimate question, FFH. You know how you say we can't prove earth is however many billion years old because there are no witnesses? Well, no one was around even 13,000 years ago to witness it. You say there is "written record" but that was recorded after the fact. By men. Who also wrote a bunch of other stuff (that isn't to be taken completely literally in a lot of cases). So I'm just wondering why you accept the age of 13,000 years when there wasn't actual witnessing, just written "record"?
Not exactly true as humans have been around a lot longer than 13,000 years. There just weren't major civilizations yet. But man has been recorded to have been around for over about 100,000 years. They weren't exactly writing any books back then though We're talking primitives here.
My faith is not based upon stuff like this, it's just an after thought.Ehh, I mean, do you not take that right there with a grain of salt? It is so easy and quick for you to dismiss what hundreds, if not thousands, of scientists (who love their profession) have worked their lives to try to DISPROVE (in order to find what it is TRUE), yet this...this you just accept so easily? Why?
Oh ahah I know, silly! I was just going with his way of thinking....13,000 years ago it was just God creating whatever...it wasn't until a "few thousand year later" God made man...so, no witnesses for that first little part.
It confuzzles me, too.....
My faith is not based upon stuff like this, it's just an after thought.
I can take it or leave it. I just happen to believe this story is true, that's all.
Ok, sorry. It's late and this thread already has my head spinning. Yeah, looking at it that way you are right. If the earth was supposedly created as FFH describes then there were no witnesses to it either so he can't really use the witness thing as a criticism of an old earth. No one would have been around to witness any of the "creation" in order to write about it so the writings had to be "created". More reason to just see them as allegorical stories to explain that which could not be known.
This thing again. I don't know if you brought this up before, but I've heard it before.
Genesis was written by inspiration given to Moses, so yeah, no one was there to witness it, of course. Moses may have witnessed the event "in the spirit" (had a vision of the creation process).Ok, sorry. It's late and this thread already has my head spinning. Yeah, looking at it that way you are right. If the earth was supposedly created as FFH describes then there were no witnesses to it either so he can't really use the witness thing as a criticism of an old earth. No one would have been around to witness any of the "creation" in order to write about it so the writings had to be "created". More reason to just see them as allegorical stories to explain that which could not be known.