McBell
Unbound
"He could still make mistakes, but not ones that go against god's rules on purpose"?How is that?
How is this anything BUT chasing your own tail?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
"He could still make mistakes, but not ones that go against god's rules on purpose"?How is that?
Let's be clear here: You just said that Allah punished the catholic church through priests sexually abusing living children for some dumb cartoons about a man who is long gone. And you are celebrating this? Jesus.
Forgetting to say something as an example, is not an illogical error. it is just an error, he forgot. However, when a prophet knows that he can't marry a child, and still does it, that is illogical, because this is not an error of judgment, i mean this is not an instant decision that you make. You think about it and decide to do it and take some time doing it too (talking to her parents, wedding .......). Which means he did it on purpose although he knows that god has forbidden it. How is that logical for a prophet? prophets who are supposed to be the best human being has to offer. Prophets who are supposed to teach us god's rules. How can they teach it to us if they can't comply to it.
No atheist believes that any of these stories are true, we're just telling you what these stories say. I think you give your prophets too much credit. Abraham tried to kill his son, Moses committed mass murders, Muhammad had a 9 year old wife.well , first of all no need for insults as they are not arguments and are very disrespectful.
second of all, you are doing the same thing you criticize, you obviously choose to believe that the story is true based on no proof whatsoever.
finally, you are making statements that have no grounds, how am i attempting to justify it, i am proving that it is impossible for a prophet to do such a thing.
How have i implied that god has no problem with it?
by saying clearly quote"although he knows god has forbidden it".
There is no reason to be touchy or insulate about the subject i am trying to explain to you my point of view.
No atheist believes that any of these stories are true, we're just telling you what these stories say. I think you give your prophets too much credit. Abraham tried to kill his son, Moses committed mass murders, Muhammad had a 9 year old wife.
Not even the "good" stories have evidence to back them up. But the actual existence or nonexistence of Muhammad is really irrelevant to the question. Even if he is a fictional character, which I believe him to be, there is still a story in the Muslim holy texts which states that Muhammad had a 9 year old wife. Atheists didn't write this story to stain Muhammad's name, Muslims wrote this story and claim it to be true.Well if you are saying you don't believe any stories about those prophets, which mean you could also believe that these people never existed, or that they existed but they were normal people, then that's okay, i mean that is your belief.
However, when you pick a bad story which have no proof and talk about it as a fact ( this whole thread was based on someone claiming that there is a fact that Muhammad married a 9 year old) that is not just telling what the story said, that is trying to come to a conclusion based on the story being a fact.
In this case, "Since Muhammad have married a 9 year old, do you think he should provide moral guidance on the topic of sex."
So i was just trying to clarify that this is just a story, it could be right and could be wrong.
He already flat out said that he picks and chooses which stories he wants to be true and which ones he wants to be false based on what he wants Mohammad's morals to be.Not even the "good" stories have evidence to back them up. But the actual existence or nonexistence of Muhammad is really irrelevant to the question. Even if he is a fictional character, which I believe him to be, there is still a story in the Muslim holy texts which states that Muhammad had a 9 year old wife. Atheists didn't write this story to stain Muhammad's name, Muslims wrote this story and claim it to be true.
Not even the "good" stories have evidence to back them up. But the actual existence or nonexistence of Muhammad is really irrelevant to the question. Even if he is a fictional character, which I believe him to be, there is still a story in the Muslim holy texts which states that Muhammad had a 9 year old wife. Atheists didn't write this story to stain Muhammad's name, Muslims wrote this story and claim it to be true.
From my experience, Muslims believe the Hadiths to be holy texts.First you should check the facts you post before you post them. There is no "HOLY TEXTS" in Islam except the quran, which i am pretty sure doesn't state that Muhammad (pbuh) had a nine year old wife.
The rest is just stories by muslims from older times, and i already explained in an earlier post that i view these stories out of hope of finding further information regarding my prophet. So, as i already said before, yes even the good stories doesn't have evidence to back them up.
I didn't say that Atheists wrote those stories, i never even mentioned atheists.
He already flat out said that he picks and chooses which stories he wants to be true and which ones he wants to be false based on what he wants Mohammad's morals to be.
He seems to be a firm believer in the "build your own Mohammad" way of deciding which stories are true and which ones are false.
Keep in mind that Mohammad was a prophet, thus making him much better than all other men...
The Hadiths are not holy?First you should check the facts you post before you post them. There is no "HOLY TEXTS" in Islam except the quran, which i am pretty sure doesn't state that Muhammad (pbuh) had a nine year old wife.
The rest is just stories by muslims from older times, and i already explained in an earlier post that i view these stories out of hope of finding further information regarding my prophet. So, as i already said before, yes even the good stories doesn't have evidence to back them up.
I didn't say that Atheists wrote those stories, i never even mentioned atheists.
I'm curious to know what you believe the "good" stories to be.I don't believe i should make my own Muhammad. I already know facts about him from the quran. However, i am looking for more info about his life and stuff like that. But i don't thrust these stories (the good ones) as facts in any conversation or post.
I never said that you think atheists wrote these stories, I said that to make my point; that we are merely observing what has been written by people who share your same faith.
The Hadiths are not holy?
Or perhaps they are not texts?
Interesting how I know many many Muslims who will flat out tell you that yes, the Hadiths are holy.
Are you going to go eselam's route and say that those Muslims are not real Muslims?
Or perhaps you will claim they are just wrong?
Interestingly how there are so many Muslims who would claim that there is no division in Islam.
I'm curious to know what you believe the "good" stories to be.
Do religious figures like Mohammed and the Pope provide moral guidance on the topic of sex that their followers claim?
I made no claims.Please don't claim on my behalf.
We believe that the teachings of our prophet are a part of our religion. That doesn't mean they are "Holy texts". We use the word Holy to describe anything that has to do directly with god. However, if some Muslims use the word elsewhere, that's not my responsibility. Although i know for a fact that most muslims agree on the subject that holiness is only for god.
I made no claims.
I asked questions.
Interestingly enough, I know many Muslims who believe that the Hadith's are as holy as the Koran.
Interesting the egg shells you walk upon.