Do You Believe in God?

[9-10ths_Penguin]

highest: "the acme or culmination": http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/high

"Acme" and "culmination" don't imply "infinite" either.

 

[buddhist]

"Acme" and "culmination" don't imply "infinite" either.

You're right, it doesn't - it is simply my axiom.

 

[9-10ths_Penguin]

You're right, it doesn't - it is simply my axiom.

So you have your own definition for "therefore" as well, then?

 

[leibowde84]

yes, I do. How come? Because it is logic. I refer the God with pronunciation He.

Can you be more specific than "it is logic"?

 

[buddhist]

So you have your own definition for "therefore" as well, then?

I see "The All is (therefore) infinite" is my way of rephrasing "Everything is everything."

 

[9-10ths_Penguin]

I see "The All is (therefore) infinite" is my way of rephrasing "Everything is everything."

So to recap...

By this:

The "All", in its nature of being the "highest", is therefore Infinite.

You actually meant:

The "All", in its nature of being the "highest", is therefore of every possible dimension and potential.

By which you actually meant:

The "All", in its nature of being the "acme or culmination", is therefore of every possible dimension and potential.

By which you actually meant:

The "All", in its nature of being the "acme or culmination", is what I accept axiomatically as being of every possible dimension and potential.

By which you actually meant:

Everything is everything.

You realize that none of this makes sense, right?

 

[buddhist]

So to recap...

By this:


You actually meant:

The "All", in its nature of being the "highest", is therefore of every possible dimension and potential.

By which you actually meant:

The "All", in its nature of being the "acme or culmination", is therefore of every possible dimension and potential.

By which you actually meant:

The "All", in its nature of being the "acme or culmination", is what I accept axiomatically as being of every possible dimension and potential.

By which you actually meant:

Everything is everything.

You realize that none of this makes sense, right?

It makes perfect sense to me.

 

[dgirl1986]

I do not.
I believe that the idea of god and gods came from a need to explain things in the days of old. EG - In ancient Greece they would use stories of gods to explain why and how night came and went.

 

[ThePainefulTruth]

Do you believe in God (or a supreme being higher than yourself)?

If you don't, then how come? What is it that you believe as far as this is concerned?

If you do, then how come? What do you call him? IS God a "him" or a "her"? And how many are there according to your belief?

I don't know there is a God, but I hope there is one along with a possible hereafter. Neither God nor spontaneous creation offer any evidence for the universe. So with such a complete lack of evidence they are equally likely, unlikely.

But IF God exists, it could only be One. Any more would be nothing but extensions of It and would necessarily become part of It. As such there'd be no need for reproduction as we biological beings do, so anthropomorphizing God with a gender is irrational. I refer to God, not disrespectfully, as "It", for lack of a better pronoun.

 

[rusra02]

Do you believe in God (or a supreme being higher than yourself)?

If you don't, then how come? What is it that you believe as far as this is concerned?

If you do, then how come? What do you call him? IS God a "him" or a "her"? And how many are there according to your belief?

Of course I believe in God. I am convinced that Jehovah is the one true Almighty God, and that what he has created testifies to his awe inspiring wisdom and power. Jehovah has acted throughout man's history. He has made his name, personality, and purposes known to all mankind.

 

[jonathan180iq]

Do you believe in God (or a supreme being higher than yourself)?

If you don't, then how come? What is it that you believe as far as this is concerned?

If you do, then how come? What do you call him? IS God a "him" or a "her"? And how many are there according to your belief?

No.

There are many things higher than myself that have nothing to do with invisible magic people who live in the sky...

 

[ronandcarol]

Do you believe in God (or a supreme being higher than yourself)?

If you don't, then how come? What is it that you believe as far as this is concerned?

If you do, then how come? What do you call him? IS God a "him" or a "her"? And how many are there according to your belief?

Yes we do believe in the One True God of the Bible. I believe that He holds the world in His hands including us and He can prosper us or eliminate us, He is the One True God of the Universe.

ronandcarol

 

[Prizebeatz1]

Do you believe in God (or a supreme being higher than yourself)?

If you don't, then how come? What is it that you believe as far as this is concerned?

If you do, then how come? What do you call him? IS God a "him" or a "her"? And how many are there according to your belief?

Yes. God is real. I believe because of a personal experience of spiritual awakening and self-realization. God does not have a gender. There is no power besides God. It is one with unshakeable unity.

 

[leibowde84]

Of course I believe in God. I am convinced that Jehovah is the one true Almighty God, and that what he has created testifies to his awe inspiring wisdom and power. Jehovah has acted throughout man's history. He has made his name, personality, and purposes known to all mankind.

What about all of the people on earth who have never had the Bible made available to them?

 

[life.period]

Every country only has one leader? That doesn't seem true.

Thinking to my own country, Canada, at least three and maybe four people (or more) could be considered the leader of the country in terms of power and authority.

Do you think they're all fighting for authority? I haven't seen this myself.

And as for gods, I would think that an infinitely powerful and wise god would have an infinite capacity to work with other infinitely powerful and wise gods. It seems to me that when you argue that your god couldn't play well with another god, you demean your god.

I am talking about president

Those leads town working under president authority not same .

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

I do not.
I believe that the idea of god and gods came from a need to explain things in the days of old. EG - In ancient Greece they would use stories of gods to explain why and how night came and went.

Not quite. It's a bit more complicated than that.

 

[9-10ths_Penguin]

I am talking about president

Those leads town working under president authority not same .

I wasn't talking about mayors of towns; I was talking about these positions:

- the monarch is officially the head of the government, but wields very little official power and authority.

- the governor general exercises what authority the monarch has on her behalf.

- the Prime Minister is the leader of the government, but can't take action without the approval of Parliament.

- all members of the House of Commons - including the Prime Minister - are subject to the authority of the speaker of the House.

So... who is the one leader in that scenario?

And in countries with a president, the president doesn't have absolute authority - usually, the legislature and judiciary can do what they want whether the president likes it or not.

When a president does have absolute authority, we call this a dictatorship. Countries don't have to be dictatorships.

 

[Tiapan]

Do You Believe in God?

Absolutely Not!
IMHO Gods are fairy tales for adults.
I believe in a universe that is built from small things that, over the epochs of time, synergize and become more complex, while obeying the laws of physics,
rather than anthropomorphize faith myths, based on the top-down approach, which often violates the laws of physics.
Cheers

 

[Muffled]

They just imply that there's a low probability that you got it right. It doesn't mean that only one is right. Its very possible that none could be right and all religions got it wrong. Or there might be some religion in the future thats the actual, true religion. You simply don't know enough to claim the truth of religion. If you do know enough and have enough evidence then you should write a world renowned report or get a nobel prize in literature.

THe muslims claim there's evidence and the Scientologists claim that there is evidence, but the question is whether its reliable and unbiased evidence based on science or very thorough history. And if its historical evidence there better be multiple, independent, unbiased parties that report on the event in question. Their stories also better be first hand account and they ought to be consistent with one another generally.

I believe evidence for me is what God says. After all He is omniscient.

 

[Muffled]

Many gods are not god

Many gods are human being .

God is not human .

You don't worship person equal to you or something worthless .


Hinduism worshipping idol's " rock

That doesn't make sense

Worshipping what they made by their hands

They are worshipping who creatation who didn't create any thing .

Christian worshipping Jesus who is a Prophet human .

Jews who corrupt god words .

All religions corrupt god words and holly book they claim is holly not holly because it is human words not god except Qur'an.

This is not my words but their own.

I worship who can hear me
Help me when I fall in a problem

I believe there is plenty of evidence that Jesus is God in the flesh. We do not worship humans who are not God.