I'm sorry Kathryn. I continually post about what truth means to me. You choose not to read it or believe me. You call me names, like dishonest. You're hostile. I'm not.
LOL, you call me names, like "hostile." I'm not. I'm direct. Very different.
I read what you post. I read what you say you believe about truth. I believe you when you say what you believe (though apparently you don't extend the same courtesy to me).
I also believe that you are evading direct answers to direct questions. Not sure why you're doing this, but it doesn't shore up your position well.
I'm sorry, you'd rather be an enemy than a friend. My offer of friendship still stands.
I don't want to be your enemy, nor do I consider us to be enemies. This is your take, not mine. You seem to be confusing debating with personal dislike. I debate even with my immediate family, on a regular basis, and I love them dearly. Just because we're debating a topic doesn't mean we're enemies. Unless of course, you choose to be my enemy. Which I would think would be weird.
This is what is true to me. Life is suffering. We suffer in birth, in aging, in illness and in death. We suffer because we don't see that everything in impermanent. We cling to things we must ultimately let go of.
What is true to me is that life can and often does hold both suffering and joy. I also believe that suffering and joy can exist simultaneously. We suffer in birth, in aging, in illness, and in death, but we can also grow and find great joy, wisdom, knowledge, peace, and understanding through this process.
It's not all about suffering - not even in this life independent of any other form of existence.
There is a state beyond suffering. There is a path that leads to a state beyond sorrow.
I agree - and we can find it here and now, and we can find it outside of this earthly life.
If you want to know the context of my personal life story as to why those truths made sense to me I can share that.
Be careful - some might think you're proselytizing!
You told me earlier, as you vacilate between offers of friendship and insults, that you wouldn't ever ask me for advice and insight, though I made it clear that I would only do so in the context of my personal story. What makes you think anyone wants you to share your own story and why you think you've found truth? How does your approach differ at all from mine?
That being said, I'd probably be interested to hear your personal story of your search for truth -but this thread is in the debate section, which is why I've been debating with you. There's a time and a place for everything.
Same way with all paths of spiritual practice. They point to the truth, but they are not the truth. Religions are like fingers that point to truth. The fingers are not the truth.
OK, nice sentiment, and it could hold some truth. But let me ask you this. If two fingers are pointing in different directions, are they both pointing to the truth?