That is all atheists have in their bag of tricks, circular reasoning,
but sadly they do not even understand the fallacy.
Conclude whatever you want but just remember this:
Are all circular arguments invalid?
No. The circularity does not reduce the validity of these arguments in any way. That is,
there is nothing inherently wrong with circular argument, although this does not mean that all circular arguments are valid and/or sound. It should be more clear now that this line of reasoning is perfectly valid.Aug 18, 2017
Circular arguments are perfectly valid - THE SKEPTICAL SCIENTIST Why is circular reasoning bad?
Circular reasoning (
Latin:
circulus in probando, "circle in proving"; also known as
circular logic) is a
logical fallacy in which the reasoner begins with what they are trying to end with.
[1] The components of a circular argument are often logically valid because if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true. Circular reasoning - Wikipedia
So here is a perfectly valid circular argument:
If the premise Baha’u’llah was a Messenger of God is true, then the conclusion God exists must be true
Of course since I can never
prove that Baha'u'llah was a Messenger of God is true I would never present such a logical argument.
Nevertheless, if Baha’u’llah was a Messenger of God is true, then God exists must be true.
