I will believe Arab and Persian leaders are truly concerned about human rights and self-determination when they propose independent states for the Kurds, Copts, Maronites, Assyrians, and other minorities in Muslim lands.
In Lebanon, the President *is* a Maronite so I don't quite see what you're getting at there. Assyrians are a religious minority group in a secular country. The Copts are a religious minority group in a non-secular country however, but
Maronites - Akin to saying that the indigenous people of Bolivia deserve their own nation-state when their president is indigenous.
Assyrians - Akin to saying religious minorities deserve their own independent nation state in the secular Christian-majority USA.
Copts - Akin to saying religious minorities deserve their own independent nation state in the non-secular Christian-majority UK.
Will we be giving California to the Mexicans soon too?
You're right about the Kurds however. Kurdistan etc.
It's not about human rights; it's about the idea that land once conquered by the Dar al-Islam cannot be allowed to fall into the hands of infidels again.
Sorry, but I've never heard any anti-Israel pro-Palestine Muslim say that was the reason for his/her views to me. They're concerned about the treatment of their Muslim brothers. We Muslims have a strong sense of solidarity with persecuted Muslims or Muslims we perceive to be persecuted.