Runewolf1973
Materialism/Animism
One thing. Just explain to me ONE thing that isn't a form of energy in one way or another. Do this and I thnk you'll even make "God, if he were to exist as a being" raise an eyebrow.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
One thing. Just explain to me ONE thing that isn't a form of energy in one way or another. Do this and I thnk you'll even make "God, if he were to exist as a being" raise an eyebrow.
I'm sure you think that clever, but you've managed to weave a bit of fluff around two words - energy and God - of which you have no credible definition or understanding.Just explain to me ONE thing that isn't a form of energy in one way or another. Do this and I thnk you'll even make "God, if he were to exist as a being" raise an eyebrow.
Precisely.doppelgänger;1311881 said:First things first. What is "energy"?
What do the things on that list have in common that make them "energy"?Motion, heat, light, thought, breath, understanding, knowledge, chemical reactions, spirit, love, death, life....the list goes on. Energy is what makes things happen. You should know it, you're body IS one of those chemical reactions, as are the thoughts you are thinking just now. I can feel the vibes already. Don't you?
Okay, so you define "energy" as "anything that has existence" and your challenge is to "explain to me ONE thing that isn't a form of energy in one way or another".They EXIST. Oh yeah, I forgot one....fluff.
Motion, heat, light, thought, breath, understanding, knowledge, chemical reactions, spirit, love, death, life....the list goes on. Energy is what makes things happen. You should know it, you're body IS one of those chemical reactions, as are the thoughts you are thinking just now. I can feel the vibes already. Don't you?
People have been doing it for thousands of years. It's called "evolution." Why stop now?If you want God to exist, just redefine what God means.
OK.I'd rather have someone point out where I am wrong than be called a prick, jerk, or whatever. To each his own.
Assertion is not proof.Fact: There is no omniscient and omnipotent god. The two inherent qualities can not exist in one. Therefore, the christion god, as defined to be omniscient and omnipotent, DOES NOT EXIST.
BS.Period. Fact. End of Discussion.
I do not want any more discussion of a god with these properties. The CAse is CLOSED. If you find an error in my argument, say it, and I'll try to correct it. BUT THE CASE IS CLOSED. PERIOD. If your god is not defined with any of these qualities, however, you may continue, if you like. I have nothing against you.
People have been doing it for thousands of years. It's called "evolution." Why stop now?
Dear God, if You cease to exist, I'll be done. You are for me like the warter is for the fish. Like the air if for the lungs, and the skies are for the birds. If You cease to exist, Philosophers will cease to think. Then, the celestial bodies will go berserk coliding with each other. And everything will be back to chaos. Ben