Autodidact
Intentionally Blank
There do seem to be rules, but clearly, if the owner beat the slave almost to death, and the slave died a few days later--no punishment.[/size]
From the book "Insight on the Scriptures", an encyclopedia on Biblical issues and understanding;
A Hebrew slave owner was permitted to strike his slave man or slave girl with a stick if the slave was disobedient or rebellious. But if the slave died under the beating, the slave owner was to be punished. If the slave lived for a day or two afterward, however, this would be evidence tending to indicate that the slave owner did not have murder in his heart. He had the right to mete out disciplinary punishment, for the slave was his money. A man would be very unlikely to want to destroy completely his own valuable property, thereby suffering a loss. Also, if the slave died after the passage of a day or more, it might not be certain whether death was from the beating or from some other cause. So if the slave continued alive a day or two, the master would not be punished.Ex 21:20, 21
As anyone can see, the slave owner was accountable to his fellow human whether slave or free man. A much different situation here from the days of the imported African slaves in the New World.
Is that your idea of morality?
Well the spirit seems to be that buying, selling and beating people from outside your tribe is just fine.It does in spirit (spirit of the law)
No, why would I? I'm an atheist. I'm not stuck with a 3000 year old morality.Do you apply it in your life and everyday dealings?