Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
But how would you know if zen is 'an accurate representation of reality', unless you were a practitioner of zen, AND know the reality which you say it represents ?
Both would be required, wouldn't you say ?
I get the physical way that you describe the universe. We see a chair. We sit in the chair. We think its solid but its mostly empty space and in fact the chair is not a chair at all but just a bunch of atoms which in turn are made of bosons, hadrons and mesons which are in turn made of quarks. And who knows what the quarks are made of?'Physical' and 'spiritual' are just concepts, just as 'foreground' and 'background' are. They're all relative, and in the final view, a singular reality. Unconditioned consciousness is the same as 'spiritual/physical'. We are all having a spiritual/physical experience all the time, but do not realize it, due to our conditioned consciousness being captured by the foreground, just as that of the fish is captured by his foreground. But we take it further than the fish: we discriminate, and then superimpose our discrimination grid pattern onto the background, ie; 'the universe', seeing it as separate 'parts', ie 'atoms', changing all the time.
A good samatha session, then a nice bracing walk by the sea, so I feel human again.
I sometimes just sit and watch waves, after a while you sort of get inside them. Nice!
Ooh, you dirty dog. Samantha is a bit of a beach girl then ?
It was NOT five minutes
So we're left to wonder for the rest of our days what it was he wanted to argue.
Like forum perhaps.I think he just wanted an argument - the content wasn't important.
No, there are lots of things.
Joe Walsh is a zen master, and this is what he had to say about things ...