Any? No, I see some
valid criticism of liberals. A false equivalence that misses the nuance of why liberal politics aren't remotely as damaging as the GOP's agenda? I'll oppose that every time I see it.
So you're still sticking the false claim that I said
they're equivalent, eh.
That's a devious tactic you're using there.
We've only talked about it in any considerable detail twice so far. If that's enough for it to earn the "pet issue" designation, does that also apply to "socialism and communism = USSR, Khmer Rouge, North Korea, and Cuba"?
Your question isn't clear.
But let's leave your defense of socialism, &
attacks on capitalism for another thread.
That Democratic agendas are far less harmful than their Republican counterparts is part and parcel of this thread's subject. A Ferrari might have some shared faults with a used Lada. That doesn't mean a comparison of the "shared faults" necessarily has any value or practical use, at least not when the vast differences are much more pronounced and relevant to current issues.
I've not actually said whose agendas are more harmful.
That would vary with time, & with which agenda.
On top of that, you & I have very different values, so
to suggest that you have The Truth on a matter that's
subjective is bogus.
Essentially, it appears that you're arguing that it's good
to demonize the right because you see them as evil.
That's a very narrow minded & sanctimonious view.
It runs counter to RF's mission of fostering civil discourse
about issues. Instead, your posts serve to enhance
hostilities...as do some from the other liberals in this thread.