The fossil record was one of the first to be found. But in the century-plus since we developed a lot more, including whole lucrative research techniques that rely on its findings.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Dr Adnan Ibrahim on Emotional Atheism
- Thread starter Godobeyer
- Start date
The fossil record was one of the first to be found. But in the century-plus since we developed a lot more, including whole lucrative research techniques that rely on its findings.
Then, despite eariler claims, you do understand that theism is optional at best?
McBell
Unbound
Is that why you endorse the OP video nonsense?
You are exempt?
some others get an extinction
For your opinion loin actualy is big cat ?
but cat remain cats and loins remain loins during the time line.
FearGod
Freedom Of Mind
Reasoning and logic as first and second came the prophecies.
FearGod
Freedom Of Mind
Believe me I'm only telling the truth, it's a fact that religion is nonsense for some and similarly the ones who
speaks about religion will be speaking nonsense, just a fact and nothing else.
It's all in the video.
FearGod
Freedom Of Mind
And who said it's forcible?
FearGod
Freedom Of Mind
The video makes sense to me because I'm a believer, for you religion is a myth and atheists' videos make sense to you.
FearGod
Freedom Of Mind
Thank you, that's the morals of the atheists, i once subscribed in their forum and their language
is telling much of what they're.
So you agree that your video doesn't make sense unless you come to the video already believing in God?
FearGod
Freedom Of Mind
I believe the video telling facts which you see it as nonsense since you don't believe in God.
I believe God does exist and this is a fact for me, for you it's nonsense.
Why does there have to be a "who"?
But how do you know whether something is designed? You need to have a way to tell between designed and undesigned things.
If sonething was undesigned, how would you know?
I think you missed his point: once we have established that something is a creation, we can say that it was created by a creator. But what many religious people do is assume that something is a creation without good reason.
That's one area where Dr. Ibrahim's video seemed to make no sense at all. What do you see as the problem with "giving something a name"?
Beavers don't live in beaver dams, either. They live in lodges - not the same thing.
It's obvious to us that a watch is designed, but it's useful to think about why this is so. Do you understand what allows us to identify a watch as designed?
Because there's no evidence for God. Do you think that accepting that one invisible thing exists means we have to accept that every conceivable invisible thing exists?
Sorry - I don't understand what you're trying to say here.
You have it backward: I don't believe in God because every argument I've ever seen for God has failed logically.
There's no such thing as "a fact for me"; one of us is wrong. How should we go about deciding who is right and who is wrong?
Speciation is not speculative. It is exceedingly well documented.
That you are not aware of the evidence does not make it any less so.
You may well decide that there is a Creator God and even that he meant for lifeforms to develop as they did and do. Or, for that matter, for gravity to be as it is. It is your belief.
But no one has to interpret the demonstrable facts of evolution and gravity as designs of a creator. The evidence for such simply hasn't been found and probably never will.
You who expect us to give a reason not to be believers.
Is it too much to expect a video that claims to present arguments to actually have arguments?
Do you truly perceive rejection of meaningless nonsense as a moral flaw?!?
In all honesty, I just don't see how anyone could make sense of the English translation that was presented in the video.
Whether one is predisposed to believe in God is not even a factor.
But if it were, then you would have to present a lot more respect towards atheism then you seem inclined to.
FearGod
Freedom Of Mind
No, i said why some discuss religion while they regard it as nonsense and a myth, IOW why wasting
their time for nonsense.