Kathryn
It was on fire when I laid down on it.
Interesting and glad I haven't seen it or even heard of it.The whole site is like that. An unholy mix of Narnia, QAnon and who knows what else.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Interesting and glad I haven't seen it or even heard of it.The whole site is like that. An unholy mix of Narnia, QAnon and who knows what else.
Protected classes don't confer distinct advantages or disadvantages on anyone. They just mean you can't be mistreated based on those characteristics. For instance, race being a protected class means that no one, white, Black, Asian, etc. can be fired for their race. It doesn't mean only Black people can't be fired for it.1) I suppose second class really means creating protected classes by which distinct advantages are promoted and creates disadvantages on others using forceful means on others and replacing otherwise more qualified and capable people with those lesser qualified and capable based soley on physical and ethnic characteristics and not ability. Aka affirmative action. That's number one for you.
If only this were so.Affirmative action doesn't mean replacing more qualified or capable people with lesser-qualified ones. It means making sure certain classes get the treatment they should always have gotten.
Luckily it is.If only this were so.
Where do you get your news and history?Thank goodness not from everywhere. I literally hear NOTHING "revolutionary" anywhere I go, anytime, anyplace.
Luckily it is.
The right seems to operate under an end-justifies-means policy.Meanwhile what the right really hates is accountability. Their hatred for ethics is exemplified by this story:
DeSantis ends 50 years of ethics oversight by hobbling state and local investigators
From all over the place.Where do you get your news and history?
Well that certainly covers a lot of ground, I bow to your cosmopolitanism.From all over the place.
My bad. In the US giving millions of dollars to politicians in order to sway them to grant you (and/or your agenda/company) legislation that favors you, is legal.Evidence?
Thanks ever so. I never get any news by the way from (or have even ever heard of) "Conservapedia."Well that certainly covers a lot of ground, I bow to your cosmopolitanism.
Maybe you can point us out to some public voices of the saner takes on Conservatism, then?Thanks ever so. I never get any news by the way from (or have even ever heard of) "Conservapedia."
No, thanks. I make up my own mind after reading things from various news sources, you know like Reuters.Maybe you can point us out to some public voices of the saner takes on Conservatism, then?
Your choice.No, thanks. I make up my own mind after reading things from various news sources.
Many lobby on behalf of like minded folk.My bad. In the US giving millions of dollars to politicians in order to sway them to grant you (and/or your agenda/company) legislation that favors you, is legal.
The NRA is one of the largest PACs in the US, and spend over 94% of their many millions of “campaign contributions” on Republicans who support them, and against Dems who sometimes oppose them.
Effect of the NRA (National Rifle Association) As a Citizens Special Interest Group Concerned With the Criminal Justice System | Office of Justice Programs
National Rifle Association lobbying expenditure U.S. 2023 | Statista
US gun control: What is the NRA and why is it so powerful?
What is the NRA?Founded in 1871 as a recreational group designed to "promote and encourage rifle shooting", the National Rifle Association has grown into one of the most powerful political organisations in the US.
It lobbies heavily against all forms of gun control and argues aggressively that more guns make the country safer.
It relies on, and staunchly defends, a disputed interpretation of the Second Amendment to the US Constitution, which it argues gives US citizens the rights to bear arms.
And of course, since the Citizens United by the conservative SCOTUS, the “funding” from such groups as the NRA has spiked dramatically; sometimes as much as 10 times their usual annual multimillion dollar submissions.
However, there are multiple claims that straight up bribery from the NRA is happening/has happened. But no arrests so far by police (who usually support the NRA), or the right-wing courts.
REPS LIEU AND RICE CALL FOR BRIBERY INVESTIGATION INTO NRA CHIEF EXECUTIVE WAYNE LAPIERRE
Senator Rubio: Return the NRA's bribe money
Representative Dennis Ross took NRA bribe money!
Whatever you say.Your choice.
But as long as the likes of Fox News, OCANN and, yes, Conservapedia and the current version of the Republican Party present themselves as the true face of Conservatism and there is hardly any contestation, you - and everyone else - should expect us to believe them.
Whataboutism is a losing strategy as long as that is true.
Perhaps more to the point, you should expect a lasting and continuous loss of respect for conservative values and voices for the same reasons.
It would be rather irrational for that not to happen.
Mascot?
He's their leader sent by God.
You've never been to Conservapedia?Whatever you say.
I do read Fox News sometimes and I've heard of OCANN but never check it out, and never heard of Conservapedia. Sorry. And I am not playing "Whataboutism."