• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Even Mainstream Conservatives Now Talk Of Violent Revolution

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation

Sander's conclusions in the earlier study and a paper he wrote for the North Carolina Law Review in June 2006 "essentially argued that law firms should not hire black graduates," said Deborah Waire Post, a Harvard Law School graduate, professor at New York's Touro Law Center and co-president of the Society of American Law Teachers.
"What this suggests is that Richard Sander is not studying affirmative action or diversity policies; he is marshaling evidence to show that blacks do not belong in elite schools or elite firms," Post said.
She likened Sander's academic assessments of affirmative action to "the late 19th and early 20th century when this country was beset by 'scholars' and 'scientists' who constructed theories of racial inferiority to justify the subordination of African Americans."

 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Perhaps The Hill has mistaken the Heritage Foundation for an official party platform. It is not, just as Ice Cube's Contract With Black America is not an official part of the Democrat platform.

The states are not at war, and we aren't going to be at war; and there will never be a need for a war. States can engineer constitutional laws that all agree upon, write treaties, change how the federal government functions. Its in the Constitution.

They're ready for civil war...to kill if they don't
get their way by the loyal opposition's submission?
The mainstream is not.

Trump is of course the result of Democrats fault for decades pushing people around and telling them what they can and cannot do in thus country and are responsible for open attacks on freedom and liberty.

People are just now surprised that talk of civil war is happening?
The mainstream is not considering civil war.
 

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
I understand.
It's somewhat like looking at a traffic accident.
Just don't believe that most Christian conservatives think like a mixture of Narnia and Q Anon. I think they are in the minority. I rarely hear anyone even discussing politics from any genre.
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
The states can do anything and have the ultimate referendum power. For example if enough states get together they can end daylight savings time, end the metric system in USA, etc. Whatever they like. They can add to the Constitution. They're not going to countenance a civil war.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Just don't believe that most Christian conservatives think like a mixture of Narnia and Q Anon. I think they are in the minority. I rarely hear anyone even discussing politics from any genre.

It is very hard to understand why the sane Conservatives would be at once so prevalent and so difficult to find, though.
 

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
Ain't that true!
Just don't believe that whatever you're reading is "the way" most Christian conservatives think or believe. I mean, I go weeks, MONTHS, and don't hear people discussing politics, from any source. I personally feel that most people are pretty sick of the conversations.
 

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
It is very hard to understand why the sane Conservatives would be at once so prevalent and so difficult to find, though.
Well, I don't know where you live but where I live, people are pretty sick and tired of politics in general, and can't believe we have basically two choices - between one old, rich man and another old, rich man, neither of whom seems all that intelligent. Which is why I am planning on voting, but writing in a name.
 

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
Who knew that I'm an atheist because of my
hedonistic lifestyle (which is more restrained
than most Christians I know). And that I support
slavery & other wicked things.
BAD Revoltingest! Hey, speaking of hedonistic lifestyles, I eventually just went to confession because it had been NINE MONTHS since I went, and I had to let things sort of stock pile. I ended up doing a couple of things just because I knew I was going to confession anyway! LOL Then I told the priest all of that and I think he got a pretty big kick out of it, to be honest.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Whatever you say.

I do read Fox News sometimes and I've heard of OCANN but never check it out, and never heard of Conservapedia. Sorry. And I am not playing "Whataboutism."
Fox News is better than Conservapedia... but not by a very large margin. Mostly, it is more careful about not quite exposing itself to lawsuits.

After all, it is the vehicle where Tucker Carlson claimed, with impressive nerve, that the January 8th people were "sightseeing".

Lying liars are liars, you know. And they ought to be treated as such.

Why people who claim to value moral values would value and protect them, that I may never quite understand.
 

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
Fox News is better than Conservapedia... but not by a very large margin. Mostly, it is more careful about not quite exposing itself to lawsuits.

After all, it is the vehicle where Tucker Carlson claimed, with impressive nerve, that the January 8th people were "sightseeing".

Lying liars are liars, you know. And they ought to be treated as such.

Why people who claim to value moral values would value and protect them, that I may never quite understand.
I said that I read Fox News "Sometimes" - hey, I read Al Jazeera sometimes too. And I literally never read or watch Tucker Carlson.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Perhaps The Hill has mistaken the Heritage Foundation for an official party platform. It is not, just as Ice Cube's Contract With Black America is not an official part of the Democrat platform.

The states are not at war, and we aren't going to be at war; and there will never be a need for a war. States can engineer constitutional laws that all agree upon, write treaties, change how the federal government functions. Its in the Constitution.


The mainstream is not.


The mainstream is not considering civil war.
I agree. A civil war would require considerable logistical and strategic planning and capable leaders.

We are certainly at the lunatic fringe stage however but a organized war is still a fair ways off.

What this should signify is the proveribal canary in the mines that we had better get our act together and make this country whole again like having a third or even fourth party enter the running , or even better to see the duopoly dissolve away like the Federalist and Whigs did with blue dog Democrats and red dog Republicans that have the capability to shake hands and pass policies on the basis of compromise.

It's why I was hopeful for the Foreward Party to make its presence known.
 
Top