Of course he isn't.
But it's believed by a great many Magas.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Of course he isn't.
How Affirmative Action Backfires
Studies suggest that large racial preferences can "mismatch" students and universities, causing them to do worse in law school, drop out of STEM majors, and become socially segregated.fee.org
Sander's conclusions in the earlier study and a paper he wrote for the North Carolina Law Review in June 2006 "essentially argued that law firms should not hire black graduates," said Deborah Waire Post, a Harvard Law School graduate, professor at New York's Touro Law Center and co-president of the Society of American Law Teachers.
"What this suggests is that Richard Sander is not studying affirmative action or diversity policies; he is marshaling evidence to show that blacks do not belong in elite schools or elite firms," Post said.
She likened Sander's academic assessments of affirmative action to "the late 19th and early 20th century when this country was beset by 'scholars' and 'scientists' who constructed theories of racial inferiority to justify the subordination of African Americans."
Nope, never even heard of it. Not planning on checking it out any time soon either. Ironic that I'd only hear of it on RF.You've never been to Conservapedia?
Oh, you're in for a real treat.
It's an alternate reality.Nope, never even heard of it. Not planning on checking it out any time soon either. Ironic that I'd only hear of it on RF.
The mainstream is not.They're ready for civil war...to kill if they don't
get their way by the loyal opposition's submission?
The mainstream is not considering civil war.Trump is of course the result of Democrats fault for decades pushing people around and telling them what they can and cannot do in thus country and are responsible for open attacks on freedom and liberty.
People are just now surprised that talk of civil war is happening?
I understand.Thanks but no thanks. Not into wasting my time, which is what this seems like. @Revoltingest
Just don't believe that most Christian conservatives think like a mixture of Narnia and Q Anon. I think they are in the minority. I rarely hear anyone even discussing politics from any genre.I understand.
It's somewhat like looking at a traffic accident.
Ain't that true!It's an alternate reality.
Visiting is useful to see how many Christian conservatives think.
Just don't believe that most Christian conservatives think like a mixture of Narnia and Q Anon. I think they are in the minority. I rarely hear anyone even discussing politics from any genre.
Just don't believe that whatever you're reading is "the way" most Christian conservatives think or believe. I mean, I go weeks, MONTHS, and don't hear people discussing politics, from any source. I personally feel that most people are pretty sick of the conversations.Ain't that true!
Well, I don't know where you live but where I live, people are pretty sick and tired of politics in general, and can't believe we have basically two choices - between one old, rich man and another old, rich man, neither of whom seems all that intelligent. Which is why I am planning on voting, but writing in a name.It is very hard to understand why the sane Conservatives would be at once so prevalent and so difficult to find, though.
Who knew that I'm an atheist because of myAin't that true!
BAD Revoltingest! Hey, speaking of hedonistic lifestyles, I eventually just went to confession because it had been NINE MONTHS since I went, and I had to let things sort of stock pile. I ended up doing a couple of things just because I knew I was going to confession anyway! LOL Then I told the priest all of that and I think he got a pretty big kick out of it, to be honest.Who knew that I'm an atheist because of my
hedonistic lifestyle (which is more restrained
than most Christians I know). And that I support
slavery & other wicked things.
Fox News is better than Conservapedia... but not by a very large margin. Mostly, it is more careful about not quite exposing itself to lawsuits.Whatever you say.
I do read Fox News sometimes and I've heard of OCANN but never check it out, and never heard of Conservapedia. Sorry. And I am not playing "Whataboutism."
I said that I read Fox News "Sometimes" - hey, I read Al Jazeera sometimes too. And I literally never read or watch Tucker Carlson.Fox News is better than Conservapedia... but not by a very large margin. Mostly, it is more careful about not quite exposing itself to lawsuits.
After all, it is the vehicle where Tucker Carlson claimed, with impressive nerve, that the January 8th people were "sightseeing".
Lying liars are liars, you know. And they ought to be treated as such.
Why people who claim to value moral values would value and protect them, that I may never quite understand.
That little thin line between tourism and terrorism.After all, it is the vehicle where Tucker Carlson claimed, with impressive nerve, that the January 8th people were "sightseeing
I agree. A civil war would require considerable logistical and strategic planning and capable leaders.Perhaps The Hill has mistaken the Heritage Foundation for an official party platform. It is not, just as Ice Cube's Contract With Black America is not an official part of the Democrat platform.
The states are not at war, and we aren't going to be at war; and there will never be a need for a war. States can engineer constitutional laws that all agree upon, write treaties, change how the federal government functions. Its in the Constitution.
The mainstream is not.
The mainstream is not considering civil war.