Let anyone else do to Trump excusers what Trump did to Carroll, they'd scream blue murder and never stop until he was hanging from a tree or lamp post.
Agreed. And what else do you need to know about their integrity, sincerity, and ethics? I take the words from any MAGA elected official or voter the way I do words from Putin. One at no point treats them like they are honest or could possibly hold any face value. You want to defend a rapist? I really don't care what such a person's opinion is about anything intellectual or moral. I might consider a restaurant recommendation from one, but I can't imaging being interested in their thoughts about the world.
They don't care about supporting a rapist. Must defend the cult leader at all costs. Even gigantic ones such as overlooking rape. It's gross. I don't get it
I don't get it either. I though I understood human beings better than that, especially Americans having been one and living there for 55 years. But I don't. All we can say is what we see and what we expect from such people but not why they are like they are in such great numbers. I generally assume that such people are either completely unable to evaluate character and evidence, see Trump in terms of midwifing an apocalypse onto earth for that or other religious reasons such as his willingness to oppress women and LGBTQ+ with Supreme Court choices and cabinet appointments, or that they are angry at the world and their lots in life and want to see America and perhaps the earth scorched and thus welcome an avenging "angel" of destruction. So, either unable to engage in critical thought, religious,
When I see this 1min clip it feels not right. Especially Biden's remark at the end.
The only remark I heard from Biden came at the end and was "I'm Joe Biden and I approve this message." What did you feel was unright about the rest of the video. It was just film clips of Trump screwing up and Haley commenting on it while campaigning against him?
Nikki saying Trump has dementia
If that's name calling, then name calling is appropriate and even necessary here. Do you doubt that he's dementing rapidly before our eyes? He's not the same Trump of 2016. The dementia wasn't nearly as apparent in 2020 as it is now. It's progression is accelerating now in terms of a visible loss of cortical function. He didn't used to be so confused or disoriented, nor as volatile, impetuous, and self-destructive.
Are you familiar with dementia, maybe through personal experience? Can you recognize it when you see it? Do you know its cardinal manifestations? It's different from the ignorance, narcissism, authoritarianism, sociopathy, and criminality that characterized his early years in office and which persist today. The episodes of confusion and memory loss now dominate his personality along with the loss of impulse control and executive function, which represent a loss of neocortical integrity and adult skills necessary for navigating life. We saw anger and a lust for vengeance, but we didn't see the tantrums before, and we didn't see him continually shooting himself in the foot like this.
To understand dementia, think of the brain and mind as an onion that adds layers in early life and then loses them in the reverse order later revealing behavior normal at an earlier and earlier age. Kids tantrum, then don't, but advanced dementia patients do act out again. Kids vocabularies are small but grow, then begin disappearing again until language is eventually lost if the disease goes on long enough before death. Infants and toddlers lack bowel and bladder control, can't feed themselves and can't be left alone until they reach a certain stage of development, but return to that in end-stage dementia and begin needing attention and help with hygiene again. Look at Trump and think impetuous, self-destructive teenager or younger. If he lives long enough, he'll be reduced to babbling, emotional incontinence (unregulated anger expression in his case - others afflicted with end-stage dementia are more fearful than angry and some even happy) and require fulltime custodial care like an infant.
Everyone [in their hearts knows that Trump is a rapist] except for those who sat in court and listened to all the "facts" that were supposed to prove it.
Judge Engoron was aware of the facts and concluded that the claim that Trump raped the plaintiff was credible, the basis of hs $5 million judgment. Sorry that you don't approve, but it's how the legal system works.
It makes you wonder why you even need a criminal court.
If you want to fine, incarcerate or put a defendant on probation (and probably to put someone on the sex offenders registry), you need a criminal conviction, which establishes whether a crime (misdemeanor or felony) has occurred. You and the other MAGA here defending Trump keep ignoring that and returning to the lack of a felony criminal conviction as if that means anything more than that he won't serve time for that crime, which doesn't help anybody except maybe the plaintiff psychologically (closure), since he's going to prison for life soon anyway.
In the meantime, she got to publicly humiliate Trump by exposing him for what he is, publicly beating him in court, and by his loss of a big judgment. He really hates losing to women (Pelosi, Cheney) and especially black ones (Willis, James),yet they're all playing him like a marionette as he sits by helplessly raging.
Just take it to Judge Judy to decide.
Done, except it was Judge Engoron. Twice now.
Trump is not convicted and sentenced for rape.
Yes, we know. You seem to think that's all that is relevant here. Why do you think that matters at all? You don't want him held criminally accountable.
I notice that you declined to answer my question. I'll ask it again, but give you my answer this time on the assumption that you'll choose to ignore it again. Please feel free to disagree if you do and explain what is correct instead in your opinion, or you can just settle for my best guess going unanswered and whatever you think that implies:
"Would it matter to you to know for a fact that he raped somebody if he did? I don't think so. If not, why fight the allegation? Trump is clearly morally unfit for everything, but apparently not everybody cares about that. In fact, it seems like about half of Americans don't. And if that's the case, why pretend to care about such things?"
My proposed answer: Virtually none of MAGA including you care that Trump is rapist. You just care that his detractors don't say that about him, and so you and the others attempt to mitigate the damage in the minds of those who would find a rapist unfit for the White House with these defenses.
As I said, if that is incorrect, you are invited to correct it with an evidenced argument (mere dissent is unpersuasive). I don't think that it is or that you can. What say you? Can you admit that you really don't care whether he is guilty or not of rape or any other crime for that matter like insurrection or stealing and sharing classified documents and then lying about them? I'm not asking you whether you think that he is guilty of those cries, but whether if you knew he was whether it would affect your opinion of Trump's fitness for public office or your posting demeanor.