Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The First Amendment protects political speech. What he was doing was verbally abusing the woman that he raped. One does not have a First Amendment protection to do that. Trump is a slow learner. It appears that we now know the magic number to get him to learn.
Four years of disaster? You do not seem to follow the news at all.
You watch too much right wing disinformation media.
You do not understand justice. You keep demonstrating that. If anything they were too nice to Trump.
LMAO! From the person that sounds as if he was a creationist every time that you try to apply a logical fallacy. You do make me laugh at times.
The last election shows he can not get enough votes even when cheating.
The fact that you are attempting to depict these as equivalent indicates either than you can't judge character or that character doesn't matter to you. There is nothing about Biden that suggests that he would sexually assault a woman or commit any other crime violent or white collar. And there is much about Trump that would lead us to believe that would and does. Like I said, you either don't notice or don't care.
No, that shows that it was decided that the smaller punitive damage had been ineffective and a much larger amount would be needed to serve as an incentive to shut him up. As was noted, it seems to have shut him up at least overnight: Donald Trump stunned into silence
He said his piece without being arrested and he can continue defaming her without fear of arrest, but he will need to pay to play that game. Speech is not always free of charge.
I don't think we have "proof" of even that, but none is needed. None was needed to find for the plaintiff twice now, just a preponderance of evidence.
The groping as you called it was obscene (and illegal though he was and likely never will be criminally charged for it). Trump is obscene; repugnant even to his wife. The judgment was just. Whatever it takes to shut the man up is justified. If he does it again, the punitive damages need to be increased to several hundred million dollars next time.
Compensatory damages depend on what the victim has suffered and what that's worth independent of the defendant's ability to pay, but punitive damages are based in what a person can afford to pay.
Can you prove any cheating by Trump in the primaries?
By saying she's not his type? I've "abused" women that way all my life.
The Afghanistan pullout where we lost everything gained over the past 20 years?
OK, so you don't follow the news.
You keep disqualifying yourself from debate by not following the events that you are talking about.
I never claimed that.
It is not a matter of agreeing or disagreeing. You appear to read titles of articles only and never understand what they are telling us.
No, if you did more than read the titles you would see that they do not help you.
Trump mistook Carroll for his ex-wife Marla Maples in a photo.