Sorry, but bisexuality, as a word, has an etymology that is profoundly binary when it comes to gender. I agree that it doesn't realistically foreclose attraction to other categories, but it also isn't describing that. The same is true with heterosexuality and homosexuality; they can also be attracted to other categories.
Activists insist on the definition you suggest but that's not how the term is usually used, and it is not yet a true term of art; the Bi is referencing sex, understood to be male and female.
Bisexuality does not have to exclude, it can be used that way, but it is not inherently exclusionary. Words adapt, their etymology notwithstanding.
Where did this whole bi = cheater thing come from? I don't get it. Maybe this fear says more about you than about me.
Bingo! Assuming someone who is bi is a cheater is absolutely about the individual's prejudices and insecurities and doesn't actually say anything about bisexuals.
Also, I really find the term "monosexual" annoying and borderline offensive when used to suggest it is somehow more liberating to be bisexual because homosexuality and heterosexuality are somehow restricting. Use of that term while insisting bisexuality carries the same meaning as pansexual, and complaining of bisexual erasure, is not doing anyone much good.
Nope, there's nothing that suggests that monosexuality is so passé and boring. I don't understand being monosexual, I don't understand not being attracted to only people of a specific gender or sex. I don't understand the concept of caring about the genitals of the person who you play with, even while blindfolded. Monosexual makes it clear that I don't understand both straight people and gay people in this respect.
How in the world does using the term monosexual harm anyone?
Additionally pansexual and bisexual overlap but are not precisely the same. Personally I prefer pansexual because I don't care about gender at all in my attraction - and that includes biological sex, and gender presentation as well. But there is nothing inaccurate about bisexual when used to describe me.
Policing other people's labels is crappy. And telling bisexuals who they're actually attracted to - still kinda biphobic.
I'm sorry, it must have been difficult for you. And besides, we all know that the cultural context you live in is very puritan.
In my cultural context, people can't stand that people do things secretly. People must live their sexuality aboveboard. One time two people I barely knew talked behind my back, and I learned of this conversation thanks to a friend of mine.
- It's disgusting that all men are fond of each other, it's a shame.
- You see, I think that the tall dark-haired guy, Ginnie's friend, is a very good person, though. At least he does everything aboveboard.
- He has nothing to do with the people I was talking about. I was talking about pigs, nasty men. That guy was born that way, poor little thing.
I was the guy.
Hay, you have this habit of speaking for everyone in Sicily, Italy, the gay community and even all women as if you knew everything about them. It's so old and yes your posts have been homophobic, sexist and biphobic as well.
I have never heard "monosexual" used in a way that is meant to show that bisexuality is better. The only time I see monosexual used is in relation to a view that does not see sexuality as a spectrum, but sees it as this one (hetero) or that one (homo), hence "mono", which completely removes other sexualities from the mix.
I use it to refer collectively to anyone who is heterosexual or homosexual. Not because they don't view sexuality as a spectrum, but simply because they're each attracted to one and only one gender/sex.
That's because you don't come from a cultural background where everyone is obsessed with other people's sexual life. I do.
Stop making assumptions about other people's culture and stop claiming to speak for everyone in your culture.
Edited to finish a thought.