I apologize for the misunderstanding then; reading it again, I believe my fault lies in reading "Such as, if the woman" and taking it(as it can be used) as exclusionary.I didn't say "only"; I said "such as".
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I apologize for the misunderstanding then; reading it again, I believe my fault lies in reading "Such as, if the woman" and taking it(as it can be used) as exclusionary.I didn't say "only"; I said "such as".
Could you elaborate on that? And how do you feel about non-consent when someone is drunk (i.e. assault/rape)?
I feel that consent and non-consent are both completely valid while drunk. Granted, past a certain point of drunkenness, with the mumbling, stumbling, puking and passing out, we should not make any effort to sexually pursue anybody who is in that state. That would be pretty rapey, IMO.
But just drunk? I know what I want and don't want and am able to communicate it when I'm drunk, even VERY drunk. I have not gotten "black out" drunk since my teens. From what I've heard from the men I've dated, it seems I actually get harder to screw (less interested in sex and more militant about policing my boundaries) the drunker I get, not the other way around.
Everybody's different, though, so my experience doesn't mean much. Usually when it comes to drunk sex, both participants are drunk. So if we call it rape, how can we ever establish who is raping whom?
Ok, so am I labouring under a misapprehension of feminism? Is it not about being treated equally? eg in terms of the same salary for the same job? Not generalising to all members of one gender on the basis of the behaviour of an individual?
I would think that the OP falls under the definition of feminism taken from Wikipedia -
"Feminism is a collection of movements and ideologies aimed at defining, establishing, and defending equal political, economic, cultural, and social rights for women."
Equal social rights for women cannot exist in isolation; it is in comparison with men.
Sexism by my mum is quite common in my house . My mum doesn't like dad doing kitchen work because he is terrible at it. That's why she sometimes say while annoyed, "I don't like men interfering in women's kitchen work."
Ok, so am I labouring under a misapprehension of feminism? Is it not about being treated equally? eg in terms of the same salary for the same job? Not generalising to all members of one gender on the basis of the behaviour of an individual?
Feminism is absolutely about equality and being treated equally. Are these casually sexist comments being made by self-identified feminists?
I couldn't say if they self identify as feminists. I may ask them.
They are not old (30s and 40s) and not unusual in their attitudes in my experience. If they do not identify as feminists am I to conclude feminists are a rarity in the UK? These us and them sexist attitudes are quite common, it seems to me. The difference between men and women seems to be women are more comfortable espousing such sexism in mixed, public company. Men can of course be as sexist, but have possibly learned to keep it under wraps.
Feminists are a rarity everywhere. It's a progressive philosophy. The majority of people are not very progressive. That's why there is so little progress.
Perhaps I shall try to raise their consciousness
I couldn't say if they self identify as feminists. I may ask them.
They are not old (30s and 40s) and not unusual in their attitudes in my experience. If they do not identify as feminists am I to conclude feminists are a rarity in the UK? These us and them sexist attitudes are quite common, it seems to me. The difference between men and women seems to be women are more comfortable espousing such sexism in mixed, public company. Men can of course be as sexist, but have possibly learned to keep it under wraps.
A lot of that could be a side effect of the feminist movement, but it's absolutely not in line with the movement's core values.
I can't speak for the state of feminism in the UK, since it's not my focus.
To be honest, this sort of thing isn't really enough information to make any conclusions about feminism as a whole in the UK, even if these two individuals self-identify as feminists.