• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Evidence of NOAH's FLOOD

Dan From Smithville

He who controls the spice controls the universe.
Staff member
Premium Member
the Big Bang is dead.
The red shift theory is dead.
Evolution and billions have year is dead.
Abiogenesis is dead.
Atheism is dead.
The dating of fossils and rock layers is false.
Uniformatraianism is dead.
Christ has no rivals, being God Almighty.

The redshift theory has been disproved, even your guys know it,
So there is no expansion of the universe.
So no Big Bang,
But then there should just be ghostly neutrinos and nothing else.



Now I feel better.

I could choose to read any nonsense.

But I come to your posts for the consistency of the empty message and the atmosphere.
 

Dan From Smithville

He who controls the spice controls the universe.
Staff member
Premium Member
the Big Bang is dead.
The red shift theory is dead.
Evolution and billions have year is dead.
Abiogenesis is dead.
Atheism is dead.
The dating of fossils and rock layers is false.
Uniformatraianism is dead.
Christ has no rivals, being God Almighty.

The redshift theory has been disproved, even your guys know it,
So there is no expansion of the universe.
So no Big Bang,
But then there should just be ghostly neutrinos and nothing else.



I didn't even know I had guys. I should get them to redo the lawn.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
the Big Bang is dead.
The red shift theory is dead.
Evolution and billions have year is dead.
Abiogenesis is dead.
Atheism is dead.
The dating of fossils and rock layers is false.
Uniformatraianism is dead.
Christ has no rivals, being God Almighty.

The redshift theory has been disproved, even your guys know it,
So there is no expansion of the universe.
So no Big Bang,
But then there should just be ghostly neutrinos and nothing else.



Repeating nonsense and linking sites with self refuting data doesn't help you.

I am not afraid to discuss with you how we know that the source you used is not honest. But you are too afraid to learn just the basics of science. That tells everyone that you don't even believe the lying sources that you use.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Repeating nonsense and linking sites with self refuting data doesn't help you.

I am not afraid to discuss with you how we know that the source you used is not honest. But you are too afraid to learn just the basics of science. That tells everyone that you don't even believe the lying sources that you use.
You get a perfect score in circular reasoning and in fulfilling dozens of Biblical prophecies. Probably each day you fulfill over 40 Biblical prophecies with exact detail and exact timing. These prophecies, which prove the Bible is the true word of God Almighty the Creator of all things, were made about 2000 to 3500 years ago. And you do that at probably least 500 times per day. Satan plays you like a chump.
And God sent the delusion you are trapped in.

This link proves that plate tectonics cannot have raised the mountain ranges of the world, but God did that.

Plate Tectonics: too weak to build mountains
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
You get a perfect score in circular reasoning and in fulfilling dozens of Biblical prophecies. Probably each day you fulfill over 40 Biblical prophecies with exact detail and exact timing. These prophecies, which prove the Bible is the true word of God Almighty the Creator of all things, were made about 2000 to 3500 years ago. And you do that at probably least 500 times per day. Satan plays you like a chump.
And God sent the delusion you are trapped in.

This link proves that plate tectonics cannot have raised the mountain ranges of the world, but God did that.

Plate Tectonics: too weak to build mountains
No, garbage links do not "prove" anything. They are not even evidence. Any idiot can write anything that they want and post it as an article. To qualify for evidence it needs to follow the scientific method. They need a testable hypothesis. And publishing in a well respected professional peer reviewed journal helps a lot too.

How does that garbage refute plate tectonics?
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
No, garbage links do not "prove" anything. They are not even evidence. Any idiot can write anything that they want and post it as an article. To qualify for evidence it needs to follow the scientific method. They need a testable hypothesis. And publishing in a well respected professional peer reviewed journal helps a lot too.

How does that garbage refute plate tectonics?
Looks like the redshift theory is in jeopardy, as is the expansion of the universe, the Big Bang, the age of the universe, evolution, the dating of things very old, abiogenesis.

Anomalies in the count of low red shift quasars.

https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=108536


https://assa.saao.ac.za/wp-content/...liffe-A-review-of-anomalous-redshift-data.pdf

Redshift Anomalies and the Big Bang – Anthony Beckett
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Looks like the redshift theory is in jeopardy, as is the expansion of the universe, the Big Bang, the age of the universe, evolution, the dating of things very old, abiogenesis.

Anomalies in the count of low red shift quasars.

https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=108536

Always vet your sources. You clearly cannot do the science, nor does it appear that the people that publish at that site can either. It is not a well respected professional journal:


Oh my!! That is even worse. It looks like it was written by a high school student. Haven't you ever seen a proper scientific paper?
And a third failure. He is an "electric universe" advocate. That is refuted nonsense as well.

Please learn how to find valid sources. If no valid sources support your beliefs then they are probably wrong.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Always vet your sources. You clearly cannot do the science, nor does it appear that the people that publish at that site can either. It is not a well respected professional journal:



Oh my!! That is even worse. It looks like it was written by a high school student. Haven't you ever seen a proper scientific paper?

And a third failure. He is an "electric universe" advocate. That is refuted nonsense as well.

Please learn how to find valid sources. If no valid sources support your beliefs then they are probably wrong.
This is just so exciting . Yiu will need to be deprogrammed.

 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
You should read the articles that you link. That was a headline, and you seemed to have ignored the question mark in it.

That tells us merely reading one sentence can be beyond your ability to understand.
So you think these sites are run by less than qualified people? I take umbrage, severe umbrage.

James Webb Space Telescope Disproves Big Bang Theory – The Sphinx Stargate

https://www.researchgate.net/public..._of_the_Big_Bang_and_the_redshift_controversy
 

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
As I previously stated, I believe that the Flood narrative is a myth* to counter the Babylonian Gilgamesh polytheistic narratives, and the main lessons that I derive from the Jewish one is that we believe on one God, not many, and that the Flood was as such so as to punish wrongdoings. So, there's one God, who teaches basic morality, who has immense power to reward or punish but is willing to forgive.

But here's also why I cannot accept the Flood narrative as being real history: Is God a homicidal maniac who practices genocide if some do somethings wrong, including children? How is that the love and compassion that Jesus taught? How is that compatible with halacha [basic Jewish teachings-- 613 Commandments-- of right & wrong]? If it's an accurate depiction of God, then count me out. :shrug:

*myth: as you're probably aware of "myth" in theological circles doesn't mean falsehood, much like Jesus' parables.
I see where you’re coming from, metis. I better understand your wish to look at it as allegorical.

To tell you the truth, I’ve never looked at the Flood that way. I figured that if there had been at least some righteous people, they would’ve gotten on the Ark.
The account does say the earth “was ruined.” And that “every inclination of the thoughts of (man’s) heart was only bad all the time.”

So, a “little wrongdoing”? I don’t agree with that.

But I also know, the Bible promises a Resurrection, of “both the righteous and the unrighteous.” Acts 24:15

I’ll try to address these issues further, at a more convenient time.

Hope you and your wife stay well, my cousin.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Your English language skills don't appear to be the best.
The findings from the James Webb Telescope show that the redshift theory is false, which shows the expansion is false and the Big Bang is also false.
Many Corollaries then are false and others are shown to be true. Evolution, billions of years, abiogenesis, rock layer and fossil dating, and Uniformitarianism are all false. That God created all things in 6 days about 6000 years ago, and the worldwide flood about 4500 years ago are all proven to be true. So here is a recap.

I already have provided several infallible proofs that evolution and billions of years are false, and that God created all things in 6 days about 6000 years ago. One of them used MI, another one used the law of non contradiction.
I also gave a challenge that no one has yet met.
I have gave many questions which show that evolution and billions of years are false.
I showed the circular reasoning which has misled the believers in evolution and billions of years.
I proved that the Bible is the true word of God, and it’s corollary that God created all things is 6 days about 6000 years ago.
This was done by all the predictions of the Bible coming true with exact detail and exact timing, predictEd about 2000 to 3500 years ago, with you keep fulfilling. I also showed that the Bible has advanced scientific knowledge in it that has only been discovered in modern times.

Here are even more evidence against the Big Bang and evolution. The Bible had it right all along. In the beginnin, God created the heavens and the Earth. - Genesis 1:1

Carbon-14 dating dinosaur bones

Plate Tectonics: too weak to build mountains



Big Bang Failures Reach the Breaking Point – CEH


crev.info
crev.info

Webb telescope solidly refutes Big Bang theory « Economics Job Market Rumors
 

John53

I go leaps and bounds
Premium Member
The findings from the James Webb Telescope show that the redshift theory is false, which shows the expansion is false and the Big Bang is also false.
Many Corollaries then are false and others are shown to be true. Evolution, billions of years, abiogenesis, rock layer and fossil dating, and Uniformitarianism are all false. That God created all things in 6 days about 6000 years ago, and the worldwide flood about 4500 years ago are all proven to be true. So here is a recap.

I already have provided several infallible proofs that evolution and billions of years are false, and that God created all things in 6 days about 6000 years ago. One of them used MI, another one used the law of non contradiction.
I also gave a challenge that no one has yet met.
I have gave many questions which show that evolution and billions of years are false.
I showed the circular reasoning which has misled the believers in evolution and billions of years.
I proved that the Bible is the true word of God, and it’s corollary that God created all things is 6 days about 6000 years ago.
This was done by all the predictions of the Bible coming true with exact detail and exact timing, predictEd about 2000 to 3500 years ago, with you keep fulfilling. I also showed that the Bible has advanced scientific knowledge in it that has only been discovered in modern times.

Here are even more evidence against the Big Bang and evolution. The Bible had it right all along. In the beginnin, God created the heavens and the Earth. - Genesis 1:1

Carbon-14 dating dinosaur bones

Plate Tectonics: too weak to build mountains



Big Bang Failures Reach the Breaking Point – CEH


crev.info
crev.info

Webb telescope solidly refutes Big Bang theory « Economics Job Market Rumors

Your post has nothing to do with what I posted. Which makes me believe I was correct about your lack of English language skills.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Your post has nothing to do with what I posted. Which makes me believe I was correct about your lack of English language skills.
Your post has nothing to do with what I posted but I believe that you have excellent English language skills.

What was the first living creature and what features did it have?
What was its code?
What caused the Big Bang and where did the fine tuned and orderly laws of nature come from?
What was the first living thing and the first 10 generations of offspring ?
How do you explain that Rev 2-3 from the Bible is an exact prediction of the 2000 year history of the church made centuries before?

The findings from the James Webb Telescope show that the redshift theory is false, which shows the expansion is false and the Big Bang is also false.
Many Corollaries then are false and others are shown to be true. Evolution, billions of years, abiogenesis, rock layer and fossil dating, and Uniformitarianism are all false. That God created all things in 6 days about 6000 years ago, and the worldwide flood about 4500 years ago are all proven to be true. So here is a recap.

I already have provided several infallible proofs that evolution and billions of years are false, and that God created all things in 6 days about 6000 years ago. One of them used MI, another one used the law of non contradiction.
I also gave a challenge that no one has yet met.
I have gave many questions which show that evolution and billions of years are false.
I showed the circular reasoning which has misled the believers in evolution and billions of years.
I proved that the Bible is the true word of God, and it’s corollary that God created all things is 6 days about 6000 years ago.
This was done by all the predictions of the Bible coming true with exact detail and exact timing, predictEd about 2000 to 3500 years ago, with you keep fulfilling. I also showed that the Bible has advanced scientific knowledge in it that has only been discovered in modern times.

Here are even more evidence against the Big Bang and evolution. The Bible had it right all along. In the beginnin, God created the heavens and the Earth. - Genesis 1:1

Carbon-14 dating dinosaur bones

Plate Tectonics: too weak to build mountains




Big Bang Failures Reach the Breaking Point – CEH


crev.info
crev.info

Webb telescope solidly refutes Big Bang theory « Economics Job Market Rumors
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Your post has nothing to do with what I posted but I believe that you have excellent English language skills.

What was the first living creature and what features did it have?
What was its code?
What caused the Big Bang and where did the fine tuned and orderly laws of nature come from?
What was the first living thing and the first 10 generations of offspring ?
How do you explain that Rev 2-3 from the Bible is an exact prediction of the 2000 year history of the church made centuries before?

The findings from the James Webb Telescope show that the redshift theory is false, which shows the expansion is false and the Big Bang is also false.
Many Corollaries then are false and others are shown to be true. Evolution, billions of years, abiogenesis, rock layer and fossil dating, and Uniformitarianism are all false. That God created all things in 6 days about 6000 years ago, and the worldwide flood about 4500 years ago are all proven to be true. So here is a recap.

I already have provided several infallible proofs that evolution and billions of years are false, and that God created all things in 6 days about 6000 years ago. One of them used MI, another one used the law of non contradiction.
I also gave a challenge that no one has yet met.
I have gave many questions which show that evolution and billions of years are false.
I showed the circular reasoning which has misled the believers in evolution and billions of years.
I proved that the Bible is the true word of God, and it’s corollary that God created all things is 6 days about 6000 years ago.
This was done by all the predictions of the Bible coming true with exact detail and exact timing, predictEd about 2000 to 3500 years ago, with you keep fulfilling. I also showed that the Bible has advanced scientific knowledge in it that has only been discovered in modern times.

Here are even more evidence against the Big Bang and evolution. The Bible had it right all along. In the beginnin, God created the heavens and the Earth. - Genesis 1:1

Carbon-14 dating dinosaur bones

Plate Tectonics: too weak to build mountains




Big Bang Failures Reach the Breaking Point – CEH


crev.info
crev.info

Webb telescope solidly refutes Big Bang theory « Economics Job Market Rumors
No one has to refute nonsense from bad sources.

Find some real scientists.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
No one has to refute nonsense from bad sources.

Find some real scientists.
They are all real scientists. While those that believe in billions of years and evolution have the wrong models, I am sure that they are all intelligent, honest, hard working people.

How do you explain polystrate trees?
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
They are all real scientists. While those that believe in billions of years and evolution have the wrong models, I am sure that they are all intelligent, honest, hard working people.
No, they aren't. I need to remind you that you would not know because you refuse to learn what the scientific method is.
How do you explain polystrate trees?
I already explained it to you. If you apologize for ignoring the answer that you asked for and ask nicely I will explain it to you again.


By the way, the time to ask questions about an explanation is when it is given. Not days or even weeks afterwards. If you do not object to an explanation that you demanded that is the same as accepting. You do not get to change your mind later.
 
Top