muhammad_isa
Veteran Member
True..Evidence is useful only when considered in a
cogent argument that addresses all evidence.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
True..Evidence is useful only when considered in a
cogent argument that addresses all evidence.
An honest person having a conscienceNot always .. some people have a conscience.
Christians swearing an oath to GodIt makes no sense to ask an atheist to swear on the Bible, quite obviously.
Yes, they do.
..and atheists believe their nonsense in a similar fashion.
And once again, we see that neither of you has any concept of what constitutes evidence that would inspire belief, nor that NOT believing is not a form of believing. I find this quite incredible, since I'm guessing that neither of you would suppose that NOT collecting stamps is a form of stamp collecting.Oh, don't you know that atheists believe their stuff since there is no evidence for God?
Maybe you have not been paying enough attention.
Did this Pink Unicorn create and maintain the universe?Do either of you know why you do not believe in the Invisible Pink Unicorn?
God communicated to some "special" humans, somewhere, sometime. I'm sure you can see how unfair that is to all those non-special people out there. I'm sure some almighty God might be able to figure that out as well.I cannot speak for God, but I don't really think God cares about the whiny babies who think that are so important that they deserve a personal message from God, the Creator of the universe. God communicated to humans and most people are happy with the way God has communicated, so if atheists don't like the way that God communicated it is tough luck for them.
The unicorn told us it is pink, duh.Did this Pink Unicorn create and maintain the universe?
Well, I can answer that .. no .. a pink Unicorn, if it exists, must be a creature. A creature did not create .. it is part of the creation.
oh .. and if it's invisible, then how can it be pink?
What sort of nonsense is this?
Why would you rather talk about pink unicorns rather than God?
It would seem that many people prefer to pretend that the Bible and Qur'an do not exist .. or that the people who believe them are somehow gullible in thinking that there is more to life than being born and dying.
I think that it is intuitive that our existence is not just some gigantic coincidence .. I think it is not difficult to believe that our conduct in this life has more meaning than just "death and oblivion".So you think the evidence for God(s) are the existence of the Bible and the Qu'ran?
It just had better not be an alcoholic drink, since that is against Baha'i Laws.
So what you've got is an argument from personal incredulity. Not very convincing.I think that it is intuitive that our existence is not just some gigantic coincidence .. I think it is not difficult to believe that our conduct in this life has more meaning than just "death and oblivion".
How? How do books that contradict each other confirm that "our existence is not just some gigantic coincidence?"The existence of the Bible and Qur'an confirms this, and we have no reason not to believe that God sent His messengers to the populated nations of old in a similar manner.
I don't see any reason to think that Adam ever existed in the first place and that the story in the Bible is anything more than that - a story.I have no idea how or when Adam first appeared on earth, and don't need to know.
I know what you believe, as you've certainly told me enough times. I'm trying to figure out why.I am satisfied that Almighty God is the Evolver from naught .. and He does what He wills.
God communicated to some "special" humans, somewhere, sometime. I'm sure you can see how unfair that is to all those non-special people out there. I'm sure some almighty God might be able to figure that out as well.
And if said God supposedly loves us as a parent does, then yes, absolutely people should be whining if their parents are neglecting them.
No, because this is a religious debate, and it is not about "scientific proof" .. it's more about theological determinations.
Hear, hear! I'm one of those non-special people too, I guess.I must be one of these "non-special" people because I prayed to God for years and pleaded with him to protect me from my adoptive mother, who beat me and abused me. I also prayed and begged him to protect me from my older brother, who would walk by and hit me and threatened to beat me up, and I prayed for his protection from the bullying and harassment I endured at school. But despite my desperation and sincere prayers to this so-called loving and merciful God, I still suffered severe abuse for thirteen and a half years at home, and I endured bullying and harassment throughout the twelve years I was in school. And during the thirty years I was a devout Christian, I was still gullible enough to believe that God would help me because I used to pray to him and ask him to help me better cope with the PTSD and the eating disorder that I developed as a result of all the trauma I suffered while growing up.
I never asked God for deliverance because I was taught earlier on in life that suffering was the "Christian" thing to do because Jesus had allegedly suffered and died for me. Needless to say, my life before I was a devout Christian was a living hell, and my life during the thirty years I was a Christian was a living nightmare. However, my life began to improve gradually after I abandoned my Christian faith and my belief, hope, and trust in the biblical God. And now my life is so much better because I'm content in life and have peace of mind because my mental health and emotional well-being are much better now too. In all honesty, assuming God exists, I don't need or want him in my life. I'm much better off without him. I know that I don't need the biblical God in my life to be a good person.
It's funny how you "true believers" in some sort of creationism move fast towards natural explanations when I ask why your God created children with defects and cancers.This is a natural event - the earth forming when the sun emerges. Happens all the time, literally.... every day I suppose.
This is something far weirder - something hitting the earth to form our seasons and give us a double planet system to stablize the earth's orbit.
Now something hit Uranus - knocked it sideways. So it can happen. But time and time again we seem to get uncannily lucky about events.
Right, a universe that is 13.4 billions years old was created just for we humans who have only been around for about 150,000 years? Does that not sound arrogant for humans to believe? It's all about us.I don't know about these "fine tuned arguments" - there was a ton of violence to create this 'tuning.'
And time is required to create us. You need time for the expansion of the universe, time for the first generaton of hydrogen stars to create 'metals' and time for generations of metal stars to build up to the point they can create rocky planets.
Why do you think the seasons are perfect? We had a summer that had 100 temps for so many days that there were serious concerns of death for many who didn't have AC. This last month saw a cold snap where temps were close to -10 for quite a few days, and led the many deaths right there. That's disruptive and far from perfect to my mind. It's survivable, not perfect. I would say perfect are highs around 80-85, and low humidity. So I think you have a bad case of "rose colored glasses". And on top of that you have hindsight bias. Look that up if you aren't aware of what it means.Sure, and we get that perfect season-creating angle, and a large moon (double planet) to stabilize that angle.
Kinda neat - the coincidences keep stacking up.
Then you might want to listen to the responses a bit better. It has been explained to you why what you have is not "reliable evidence". buy saying that "it can never be realized" (fixed that spelling for you) you are in effect stating that you do not have any reliable evidence. Perhaps you might want to rethink your response.
Also the OP sure felt that he had some "evidence". If you don't have any reliable evidence why even try?
The smiley indicates that I was kidding. I know that the British have different spellings, And since they invented the language they can get a bit techy when "corrected".Careful. Wrongly accusing someone of incorrect spelling ("realised" and "realized") are interchangeable spellings) coupled with a typo opens you up to all kinds of responses ...
Hear, hear! I'm one of those non-special people too, I guess.
I am so sorry that you had to go through that. My Dad went through something very similar and I saw how his belief that he was taught that there was something wrong with him since he was born. You know, the Christian way, and all!
I'm happy to hear that you are doing well now, and recovering from all the terrible abuse you had to endure. Nobody should have to go through that. I've been trying to recover from trauma for the last 25 or so years as well. I know it isn't easy. Who cares what some imaginary God thinks. I think you're special.
The revelations from God were not inaccurate when they were first revealed but after man meddled with them over long periods of time, these religions no longer resembled what was originally revealed.
Is it fair to say you decided a God exists via this evidence? And since it is evidence that does not impress critical thinkers it is as best WEAK evidence, therefore your conclusion about a God existing could be in error?I see that there IS evidence for God.
You could be sincere in your decision that some sort of God exists, but not be aware that you used flawed thinking to make the conclusion, and thus mistaken. The major flaw is that believers assume their God exists, and then request evidence that it doesn't exist, which is a fallacy of "proving a negative". You could know this if you read what critical thinkers write. Critical thinkers offer more concise reasoning than theists in relation to religious concepts. We approach ideas as if by default they are untrue, and seek evidence that the idea IS true.If there was no evidence, I would not know what I do know.
It is not as if I have just made it all up.
It's more acurate to say that critical thinkers reject the claims made by fallible mortals that messengers existed and offer divine revelations. The revelations are not convincing. There are more plausible explanations for what these revelations are, and how they came to be.No. It is just that human beings DENY that messengers were sent .. DENY that messengers were given revelation.
If there is any fraud it is believers who are not being transparent and honest about the nature of what they think is evidence.They claim that it's all fraud and delusion.
That is "their" nonsense.
Hear, hear! I'm one of those non-special people too, I guess.
I am so sorry that you had to go through that. My Dad went through something very similar and I saw how his belief that he was taught that there was something wrong with him since he was born. You know, the Christian way, and all!
I'm happy to hear that you are doing well now, and recovering from all the terrible abuse you had to endure. Nobody should have to go through that. I've been trying to recover from trauma for the last 25 or so years as well. I know it isn't easy. Who cares what some imaginary God thinks. I think you're special.
Because they share something in common -- they are both the inventions of humans.Did this Pink Unicorn create and maintain the universe?
Well, I can answer that .. no .. a pink Unicorn, if it exists, must be a creature. A creature did not create .. it is part of the creation.
oh .. and if it's invisible, then how can it be pink?
What sort of nonsense is this?
Why would you rather talk about pink unicorns rather than God?
It would seem that many people prefer to pretend that the Bible and Qur'an do not exist .. or that the people who believe them are somehow gullible in thinking that there is more to life than being born and dying.