Evolution - a very bad joke...

[outhouse]

How could there possibly have been human beings 260 million

There were not humans back then. EVERY footprint has been debunked. THEY NEVER HAPPENED.

You believe that man could stay isolated and unaffected by extraterrestrials for a few million years while slowly evolving?

You have to be uneducated and ignorant to think otherwise.

Do you think that UFO's had leashes on us your killing me lol

I tell you that evolution is statistically impossible to ever have existed.

Your right evolution didnt exist, it happened and is happening

evolution and it has no scientific basis at all

this is your ignorance and lack of education.

 

[McBell]

Ants and the aphids. How did ants learn to farm aphids. When they started to farm the aphids did they intentionally breed them for better farming.

It seems weird but is very much possible. Ants have intelligence. Breeding for better farming is simple stuff.

If any animals used their intelligence to breed certain plants say. Now lets look at the area they live it it has 1000's of red berrys. 20000 years ago there were red and blue berries the animals of the area didn't like the blue berry and systematically destroyed them so the red berry can flurish.

Would an evolutionist be able to determine this or even try. He would have a story for the evolutionary success of the red berry for sure, but could he mention the blue berry.

All I'm saying and I'm done is there are holes in the theory of evolution. 1 It gives humans to much credit, 2 it discounts interspecies breeding and selective breeding, 3 Only evolutionists can verify evolutional paths and lastly other than giving us a way to view things it really doesn't do all that much.

Perhaps you did not understand the question...
That's alright though, seeing as you say you are done.

 

[outhouse]

All I'm saying and I'm done is there are holes in the theory of evolution.

do you have an example to back your statement or is this a lack of education?

It gives humans to much credit

how can id give humans to much credit, we are simply observing what happened.

Only evolutionists can verify evolutional paths

incorrect I can show 4rth graders the line up of our ancestors skulls and they can give a more detaied answer then most christians

 

[Magic Man]

The worst part is that with so much time and effort put into it, it's hard to imagine Gauss is a Poe, and we know bobhikes isn't a Poe.

 

[Gauss]

There were not humans back then. EVERY footprint has been debunked. THEY NEVER HAPPENED.

.

Debunked by whom? Some modern evolutionist professor that desperately wanted to hold on to his position of power... Then the samples mysteriously disappeared, again and again...

Who built the submerged cities btw?... Tell us, who built them?

And btw lots of science professors have debunked the evolution theory, those are the upright ones not afraid of loosing position due to "political motives"...

Let´s see, The Washington Post was a respected newspaper in 1925 too I believe:

The Washington Post Jun 22, 1925;​

Large Skulls at the Ica Museum in Mexico.
Click and drag photo to resize.

Mexico City, June 21---Giant human skeletons…measuring from 10 to 12 feet have been discovered by prospecting miners in a new gold and silver district in the mountains of the State of Chihuahua, according to members of the party who arrived here today.​

​

The miners say they found a group of these skeletons intact in a hidden cave. The feet measured from 18 to 20 inches. (A male with a U.S shoe size of 13 has approximately a 12 inch foot). The government anthropology department plans to send a commission to investigate the discovery.



Find Prehistoric Giant

Feb 3, 1909; New York Tribune
Skeleton 15 Feet High Unearthed in Mexico​

News was received here Monday from Mexico that at Ixtapalapa, a town 10 miles southeast of Mexico City , there had been discovered what was believed to be the skeleton of a prehistoric giant of extraordinary size.​

​

A peon while excavating for the foundation of a house on the estate of Augustin Juarez found the skeleton of a human being that is estimated to have been about 15 feet high, and who must have lived ages ago, judging from the ossified state of the bones.

​

______________________________
​

Everyone enlightens to his truth...

 

[Gauss]

we are simply observing what happened.

Tell me, who is "we"? Is it your gvmt or the ones controlling your gvmt or is it the good person doing the real work? And atheists trust this establishment blindly....


I tell you, there is no "we", there are only good people and wicked people. Lately lots of wicked people have been ruling the world. That is why an obscure theory like the evolution theory ever got a foothold in science.


PS:

Man as old as coal
Welcome to edconrad.com
Wrote Bill O'Brien:
"There was a time when Conrad regarded the integrity of the scientific establishment as beyond reproach. But after seven years of dealing with paleontologists and archaeologists, he said he has found them to be a devious and untrustworthy bunch whose actions in relation to him have been downright dishonest and deceitful."
"Conrad believes his discovery has frightened members of the archeological/ paleontological establishment out of their wits. They dread the truth, he says, because they know their cozy little clique will be gone with the eons. No longer will they be able to sup at the trough of Darwinism, enjoying soft jobs with huge salaries."


Suppressed archaeology

 

[Meow Mix]

Thanks, History Channel. Look what your pseudoscientific/pseudohistorical garbage has done to us.

 

[David M]

Just some initial brief web links to discuss as a background to the most coverred up and flawed theory in modern society.....

Giants in Those Days--Historical News Articles Featuring Ancient Giants ---Page 19

Lies and hoaxes. And irrelevant to evolution.

Zhengjian Book Series: <i>Removing the Veil from Prehistoric Civilizations</i>, Part 6 -- Enduring Myths: Relics in the Ocean | Pureinsight

So the rise of civilisations gets pushed back a few thousand years? Irrelevant to evolution even if its true.

There Were Giants in Those Days: Giant Humans, Dinosaurs and Ancient Civilizations of Spain........Page 28

Pure unsubstantiated silliness and hoaxes.

Steve Quayle News Alerts: Ancient Civilizations and Technology

Someone who thinks the Ica stones are genuine, enough said.

Morien Institute - the mysterious underwater pyramid structure at Yonaguni

So the rise of civilisations gets pushed back a few thousand years? Irrelevant to evolution if its true.

How could people build underwater cities carved out of stone 10s of thousands of years ago... How could big newspapers report giant skeletons 100 years back?

Even the loons at these sites do not claim people were building underwater cities. They claim these were built on coastal plains that were submerged by sea level rises after the end of the last ice age.

How can there be big human footprints dating back millions of years in cliffs?

There aren't, its a hoax (and the author knows nothing about geology).

How can there be human figures with a telescopesin rocks that were engraved 30 000 years ago?

There aren't.

Etc etc..... The evidence of prehistoric civilizations are just massive and they were way more tech advanced than our civilization...

Congratulations for assembling a parade of hoaxes, fraud and outright silliness.

But even if these cities were built around 8,000BC that would have no impact on evolution whatsoever.

See this is the problem with evolution. An evolutionist will tell you the German Shepard is not naturally evolved but selectivly breed. Why because it causes problems for evolution if the German Shepard was naturally evolved. So they are saying that what we do is not natural. We are somehow outside of nature and we are effecting the way nature would create things. This is very much what god is and I am atheist so it is a major problem. Writing evolution so that it includes us causes all kinds of headaches so it was eaiser to just say we influence natural selection.

They are selectively bred, the simple proof of that indeniable fact is that if they mate with dogs of other breeds (which is what they do if not locked away) the offspring are not purebreds any more. Give it a few dozen generations and all the offspring are mongrels.

No, they are not saying that what is being done is not natural but that artificial selection and natural selection are different ways of selecting for traits.

Misunderstanding evolution (and science in general it seems) is what causes you headaches, but that is down to your ignorance of the subject rather than the fault of the subject.

 

[Autodidact]

My biggest gripe against evolution is pretty much the same as all my gripes against science.

Exactly, and I appreciate your honesty. Evolution is science. If you think science works, and is the best way to learn about the natural world, you accept it. If you hate science and think the best way to learn about the world is to maintain faith in an ancient holy book, then you oppose it.

Evolution = science.

 

[Orias]

Exactly, and I appreciate your honesty. Evolution is science. If you think science works, and is the best way to learn about the natural world, you accept it. If you hate science and think the best way to learn about the world is to maintain faith in an ancient holy book, then you oppose it.

Evolution = science.

Evolution = Opposition.

 

[Enoughie]

Tell me, who is "we"? Is it your gvmt or the ones controlling your gvmt or is it the good person doing the real work? And atheists trust this establishment blindly....


I tell you, there is no "we", there are only good people and wicked people. Lately lots of wicked people have been ruling the world. That is why an obscure theory like the evolution theory ever got a foothold in science.
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/archaeology.htm

Yes. You're right. It's all a conspiracy!

There's a vast conspiracy involving millions of scientists - that is 99.99% of scientists, who recognize the theory of evolution (which they must pledge allegiance to before they can become scientists.

Moreover! These scientist all conspire with governments who want to... um... want to... create an.. um.. a sciensocracy! NO. A atheocracy! A world government run by atheists and scientists. So they can teach science, and discover cures to cancer and AIDS.



Just out of curiosity. How many world leaders do you know who are either atheists or scientists?

_____________________
Geopolitics.us - Natural Philosophy of Life - a simple, elegant, and powerful alternative to religious dogma

 

[Orias]

Yes. You're right. It's all a conspiracy!

There's a vast conspiracy involving millions of scientists - that is 99.99% of scientists, who recognize the theory of evolution (which they must pledge allegiance to before they can become scientists.

Moreover! These scientist all conspire with governments who want to... um... want to... create an.. um.. a sciensocracy! NO. A atheocracy! A world government run by atheists and scientists. So they can teach science, and discover cures to cancer and AIDS.



Just out of curiosity. How many world leaders do you know who are either atheists or scientists?

_____________________
Geopolitics.us - Natural Philosophy of Life - a simple, elegant, and powerful alternative to religious dogma

The Masons may have much to offer in your theory of world domination

 

[Enoughie]

The Masons may have much to offer in your theory of world domination

Except, of course, for the fact that the masons believe in a supreme being..

_____________________
Geopolitics.us - Natural Philosophy of Life - a simple, elegant, and powerful alternative to religious dogma

 

[Orias]

Except, of course, for the fact that the masons believe in a supreme being..

_____________________
Geopolitics.us - Natural Philosophy of Life - a simple, elegant, and powerful alternative to religious dogma

You sure about that?

 

[Enoughie]

You sure about that?

Yes.

"One of the pre-requisites that must be satisfied by a prospective candidate in order to become initiated into the “mysteries and privileges” of freemasonry is to declare belief in a Supreme Being"

Freemasonry: belief in a Supreme Being

_____________________
Geopolitics.us - Natural Philosophy of Life - a simple, elegant, and powerful alternative to religious dogma

 

[Orias]

Yes.

"One of the pre-requisites that must be satisfied by a prospective candidate in order to become initiated into the &#8220;mysteries and privileges&#8221; of freemasonry is to declare belief in a Supreme Being"

Freemasonry: belief in a Supreme Being

_____________________
Geopolitics.us - Natural Philosophy of Life - a simple, elegant, and powerful alternative to religious dogma

The "Architect" is nothing new.

It ties closely with self ascention.

I think I would know

Look over supreme and being more carefuly, and think the Opposite of externalizing divinity and what it means to have carnal desire.

 

[Enoughie]

The "Architect" is nothing new.

It ties closely with self ascention.

I think I would know

Maybe. But that has nothing to do with atheism..

"A Mason is oblig'd by his Tenure, to obey the moral Law; and if he rightly understands the Art, he will never be a stupid Atheist nor an irreligious Libertine"

_____________________
Geopolitics.us - Natural Philosophy of Life - a simple, elegant, and powerful alternative to religious dogma

 

[Orias]

Maybe. But that has nothing to do with atheism..

"A Mason is oblig'd by his Tenure, to obey the moral Law; and if he rightly understands the Art, he will never be a stupid Atheist nor an irreligious Libertine"

_____________________
Geopolitics.us - Natural Philosophy of Life - a simple, elegant, and powerful alternative to religious dogma

Sure it does, it has to do with evolution, not just of the body, but of the mind.

 

[Enoughie]

Sure it does, it has to do with evolution, not just of the body, but of the mind.

So what you're saying is that when they explicitly say: "he will never be a stupid Atheist." What they actually mean is the exact opposite. Got it! Now it all makes perfect sense.

_____________________
Geopolitics.us - Natural Philosophy of Life - a simple, elegant, and powerful alternative to religious dogma

 

[nrg]

I believe in evolution to a point it and has help us greatly; however, it has issues and these issues points to flaws in it. It also once discovered gave us a way to think about how things happened. It does not predict what will happen and requires artificial evolution to create new things.

Again, you can't predict what will happen in chaotic systems, but that's not a flaw. It's no secret that chaotic systems exists.

Animal husandry, plant breeding, gene splicing is not natural evolution which begs the question does natural evolution even exist today.

Yes. Ever heard of fertility? Human Evolution: Are Humans Still Evolving? - TIME

See this is the problem with evolution. An evolutionist will tell you the German Shepard is not naturally evolved but selectivly breed. Why because it causes problems for evolution if the German Shepard was naturally evolved. So they are saying that what we do is not natural. We are somehow outside of nature and we are effecting the way nature would create things. This is very much what god is and I am atheist so it is a major problem. Writing evolution so that it includes us causes all kinds of headaches so it was eaiser to just say we influence natural selection.

Evolution is simply the passing or not passing of genetic differences. Wether it's mother nature who makes the choice and kills the animal, or her potential mates who gives her the cold shoulder or we who choose her "better" sister to carry on her genes is beside the point.