• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Evolution and Creationism both have equal value and scientific evidence to support them.

Danmac

Well-Known Member
When was the last time you drove by this sign?

Logo_normal.jpg

atheistaa.gif


Seems like atheists form groups not churches. Since they have an agenda, like church, we'll call it church.
 
Last edited:

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
atheistaa.gif


Seems like atheists form groups not churches. Since they have an agenda, like church, we'll call it church.

We have an agenda? No one told us about it. But then again....none of the atheists I know have ever been to Atheist Church.
 

The_Evelyonian

Old-School Member
Seems like atheists form groups not churches. Since they have an agenda, like church, we'll call it church.

Church: a place for public (especially Christian) worship.

Considering the fact that atheists don't worship anything, I'd say your definition fails.
 

tumbleweed41

Resident Liberal Hippie
Sorry to interrupt.....


But what the hell does atheism have to do with the overwhelming empirical evidence for the ToE, and the complete lack of evidence for Creationism?

The simplistic thinking that science=atheism shows a lack if basic reasoning skills and a failure to attempt to even try to understand the issues.
In other words, a strawman that draws away from the actual discussion.
 

Danmac

Well-Known Member
Sorry to interrupt.....


But what the hell does atheism have to do with the overwhelming empirical evidence for the ToE, and the complete lack of evidence for Creationism?

The simplistic thinking that science=atheism shows a lack if basic reasoning skills and a failure to attempt to even try to understand the issues.
In other words, a strawman that draws away from the actual discussion.

Presuppositions influence interpretation.
 

The_Evelyonian

Old-School Member
So your here to be entertained? Is it possible that you want to stop the spread of theistic lunacy?

I couldn't care less about "theistic lunacy". I come here to debate religion because it's fun, it's something I enjoy doing.

You asked the question. That's the honest answer.
 

painted wolf

Grey Muzzle
So your here to be entertained? Is it possible that you want to stop the spread of theistic lunacy?
If it is, I've never encountered it. You would think they would try to win a theist like me over to "their side"... but they never do.
As a scientist who accepts God and all... you would think I'd make a nifty prize. :cool:

wa:do
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
If it is, I've never encountered it. You would think they would try to win a theist like me over to "their side"... but they never do.
As a scientist who accepts God and all... you would think I'd make a nifty prize. :cool:

wa:do


It's not that atheists haven't proselytized you. I'ts that their method of proselytization is to play hard to get. Real hard to get.
 

The_Evelyonian

Old-School Member
If it is, I've never encountered it. You would think they would try to win a theist like me over to "their side"... but they never do.
As a scientist who accepts God and all... you would think I'd make a nifty prize. :cool:

wa:do

Don't worry, oh no. We'll get you my pretty, and your little dog too! ;)
 

tumbleweed41

Resident Liberal Hippie
Presuppositions influence interpretation.

Baseless accusation .

Please provide a specific example of a currently accepted biological scientific conclusion that has not been tested, and repeatedly challenged before acceptance. But instead relies on unscientific presuppositions.
 

Danmac

Well-Known Member
I couldn't care less about "theistic lunacy". I come here to debate religion because it's fun, it's something I enjoy doing.

You asked the question. That's the honest answer.

Oh I see. So your not against believing in God then your just here to have a good time right?
 

Danmac

Well-Known Member
If it is, I've never encountered it. You would think they would try to win a theist like me over to "their side"... but they never do.
As a scientist who accepts God and all... you would think I'd make a nifty prize. :cool:

wa:do

Having our cake and eating it too are we?
 

sniper762

Well-Known Member
atheism is a "non-belief", and yes allowed by "free agency".

i ask: if im wrong, what have i got to lose?

on the other hand, if your wrong, what have you got to lose?
 

Danmac

Well-Known Member
Baseless accusation .

Please provide a specific example of a currently accepted biological scientific conclusion that has not been tested, and repeatedly challenged before acceptance. But instead relies on unscientific presuppositions.

Why macroevolution of course.
 
Top