Evolution as it relates to Religion

[rational experiences]

We own. We claim ownership as the human. The claim I own dominion in creation.

Our behaviours exhibit that word explanation.

We live.

We are evolved. The correct word ownership.

Teaching is about movement that pre existed.

Why ship is used in the explanation I own.

So we evolved. Evolution is a past text description only.

As an evolved being. The human we get sick and survive. If we get sick can die. Which is not evolution as some lying theist...the human only quote.

So humans sick and tired of how just humans think. Who only tell belief stories theory position one the human. Always.

Implemented a legal system that said humans have to be forced to stop lying. As they make up stories that own our life dominion not existing.

True legal reason. Theists are liars. So said the legal system.

Hence a teaching just a sentence said by a human using words that said. ... Humans have and own dominion in God the earth's creation.

As all subjects and all topics exist now and can't be discussed by just a few words.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

You are the one dodging the obvious.

What am I dodging?

 

[paarsurrey]

The in's and out's of evolution are unknown to me, but adaptation, survival of the fittest, and natural selection are not. Humans have remnants of a tail. Is this from our evolution in the womb, or a future possibility for us, or are we simply on route to a repeat from single cells to newborn's on a larger scale?

As a planet, tectonic egg shell like plates shift and move causing changes in land masses and tides and atmosphere. I wonder if it possible that our planet is evolving as a cell (like an egg) as we act as tiny micro type of influence in it's evolution. How and where does religion fit in? Maybe in terms of unknowing and trying to figure out our future from our past and present.

New to this line of reasoning

My religion also has very strong hints, as I understand, with various verses to the affect that human and other life evolved under complex processes as designed and set forth by the Creator G-d till the time of Adam and Eve who were not, we understand, the first individuals to be created but were the two among many who got evolved may be in billions of years, please. Right?
Adam was the first Messenger/Prophet of Allah/G-d to whom Allah/G-d had honored to Converse directly and he was sent to his people to guide them in the Spiritual path towards G-d, I gather, please. Right?
We are thankful to the scientists who have discovered several physical stages man underwent in all these billion of years, please. Right?

Regards

 

[Wildswanderer]

Why do some people have the ability to wiggle their ears if we do not use our ears that way? It is a vestigial trait.

No it's just muscles that we need in our face.

 

[Wildswanderer]

What am I dodging?

That there's no reason to think your spine is not exactly how God designed it to be originally.
No one has shown any evidence at all that we once had tails... although they might be nice for construction workers, when you need that third hand.

 

[Wildswanderer]

Natural selection did.

Natural selection has no intelligence. It can not design anything.

 

[Wildswanderer]

Again, vestigial does not mean the tailbone doesn't have a present function. It just isn't a full fledged tail anymore.

And never was.

 

[Wildswanderer]

The fact that tails form in development and that sometimes babies are born with them is evidence that it was once a tail.

How? It's part of the cycle of birth.. nothing to do with swinging from trees.

 

[rational experiences]

If a babies spine is too long for its genetic body then once we were taller.

If a human theist pretending they're a God or claim natural selection by human topics only as thoughts words. Defining humans as dominion over all things.

Is our status.

You're just an egotist in a human cult. Not any God being. As the theist. It's behaviour only.

As if apes had sex and by sex produced a mutant as a human. Is the term how science by humans biology themes claims we own life. Sex isn't any god.

Unless a man who procreates his species existence misquoted his human status.

Which isn't evolution as a subject nor is it creationism.

Apes all types gave their own healthy babies. A mutated baby is a sick baby.

That human intelligent advice to observe is legal and exact as opposition to a theist human storyteller using cult group bully tactics.

Being the term a humans bad behaviour. Cult behaviour. Believe it or else. And not actually legal by using words in a sentence legal by a human thinking only.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

How? It's part of the cycle of birth.. nothing to do with swinging from trees.

How what? Do you mean the developmental pathway of tail development. I'm not a developmental biologist, so even I would have to look that up.

Presumably, it may have had that use in our ancestry. Of course tails are useful for balance even on the ground. Not all animals that have tails use them to swing with.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

And never was.

So you say, the evidence says otherwise.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

No it's just muscles that we need in our face.

Waving it off doesn't change the fact that some people have that vestigial trait or that it had a use among our ancestors.

Why do these genes exist in our genome if they never served any function? It doesn't make any sense that chickens have genes for teeth unless their ancestors had teeth.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

That there's no reason to think your spine is not exactly how God designed it to be originally.
No one has shown any evidence at all that we once had tails... although they might be nice for construction workers, when you need that third hand.

We didn't and don't normally have tails. We have the vestiges of tails. Our ancestors had the tails and the evidence tells that tale.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Natural selection has no intelligence. It can not design anything.

Not purposefully with a goal, but it does lead to the features that exist in living things.

 

[Wildswanderer]

So you say, the evidence says otherwise.

No one has presented any such evidence just bare claims.

 

[Wildswanderer]

We didn't and don't normally have tails. We have the vestiges of tails. Our ancestors had the tails and the evidence tells that tale.

Only we don't. We have spines..I have a mirror you know. I think I'd notice if I had a tail.

 

[Wildswanderer]

Waving it off doesn't change the fact that some people have that vestigial trait or that it had a use among our ancestors.

Why do these genes exist in our genome if they never served any function? It doesn't make any sense that chickens have genes for teeth unless their ancestors had teeth.

Birds with teeth aren't uncommon even now.
Wiggling ears somehow equals birds teeth? What?

 

[Dan From Smithville]

No one has presented any such evidence just bare claims.

Don't you know the evidence? You make claims denying it. I didn't want to assume you were just denying without knowledge.

The tail itself is evidence. And that there are genes for tails in people. Why are they there? Is it some sort of ruse to make us think we evolved from something with tails?

 

[Wildswanderer]

How what

How does a fetus having a piece of skin that he grows into somehow equal a useful tail? It doesn't have anything to do with an actual tail.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Only we don't. We have spines..I have a mirror you know. I think I'd notice if I had a tail.

That is a ridiculous response. No one has claimed that we have normally express tails now. You know that. If you aren't going to be serious, what is the point. You seem to do this when you have run short of reasons for denial. I'm open to entertain your evidence and arguments for how the spine is designed as is with no precursors. I'm just guessing that you have pretty much presented all there is to it.