Seems as though it is roli who does not understand it.
And to make matters even worse, roli does not WANT to understand it.
Scientists have some very interesting studies in certain areas of science and as I have said before, they are important to enhance life, but when they mix humanism in with atheisim it becomes a religion that has an agenda to totally remove the concept of God ,creationism etc, dspite what you or others say in defense.
They need to apply for tax exemption !!!
Scienists are stumped by such complexities as the origin,fuction and design of the eye which causes questions regarding evolution by natural selection, random chance.
The only difference with modern evolutionary theories today is the spin they palce on all their terms ,findings and objectives.
Man can't come close to designing an equal to the human eye, which if they tried would take the most massive and complex computer to attempt to simulate what the eye can do.
Understand what , that the underlying argument and overall objective of evolutionists is to ultimately set in the minds of society that we came from a massive inanimate explosion, but they mask it with a modern theory and smoke screen that we have come from a common ancestor , how appropriate and almost convincing, a common ancestor really does make sense to the masses.
It's interesting that is not what was in the school text books , when evolution made it's scene in our western culture,maybe because the theories scientific explainations evolve as random as they beleive humans did.
It's revised into a new evolutionary model , such as the" common ancestor"
Did'nt it go something like this in the school textbooks,"millions and millions of years ago there was a massive explosion" and man came from some
Prebiotic soup mix" , which ultimately says we came from a bacteria cesspool and surprise complex humans.
Evolutionists simply amaze me in their creativity.
I truly beleive the irony of all this is that evolutionists are creationists in the fact they create evolutionary theories continuous to cover over their last findings to appear superior and on top of their field.
But what is it that you beleive beyond the common ancestor, you got all the answers ,why stop there,how can speicies change into other speicies, where is the fossil records and where is evidence of it happening today.
There is no evidence of the evolutionary process that you all believe happened and where not talking about mini ,micro evolutionary change that we all believe takes place .
it's macro evolutionary process that you ultimately believe, which there is no record of speices changing into other species as you suggest.
I am not talking about your proof in which you use an insect changing metamorphically into some particular advanced stage of the same species doing nothing more than what was in it's DNA.
I know,.... you claim it is all over ,they ceased milliona of years ago REGARDING macro evolutionary changes, how convenient.