I disagree, evution has considerable logic errors.
Fortunately, we don't need to rely on logic when we have so much evidence.
Also, I think what you are calling "logic" is what people who study logic would actually call "common sense": You don't understand something, you don't know the answer, so you just grab onto of the first answer that feels right to you and hold on for dear life. Nothing you've written has the appearance of logic to me.
But apparently my view of evolution is no longer accepted so I need that resolved, I need some better clarification of what constitutes evolution.
I thought of evolution as progressive meaning a more advanced or
Better adapted organism will
Survive.
But several persons have said this is not the case so that needs resolution.
You are unnecessarily bringing in the concept of progress or advancement. Change is always occurring. Whales, for example, crawled out of the sea for a few million years and then crawled right back into it. All along they were adapting to their environment. The environment itself was changing, meaning what worked 100,000 years ago didn't work any more. And so on and so forth.
The world is always changing, the life forms on the earth are always adapting and sometimes even contributing to the changes, as is the case with bacteria and plant life that change the atmosphere: when that happens, you'd better be able to breathe it or die.
It's not necessary to assume that because the world is always changing it must be going in some linear direction - more this, better that, yada yada, toward some ultimate goal.
Are the planets going somewhere, or do they simply orbit the sun, round and round, wobble wobble wobble, winter, spring, summer, fall, new moon, half moon, gibbous (love that word), full. Tide goes in, tide goes out.
To make a long story short, change and progress are entirely independent of one another. Evolution tells us only how we change over time in response to the changes around us. It has nothing to do with where we are going or where we came from.