Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
But you don't believe fish stay as fish, do you. Laugh again -- I'll leave gorillas out of this now, I guess there's no "evidence" that they are evolving to -- whatever a gorilla might evolve to.
The evidence shows that 375 million years ago during the Devonian period the common ancestor of tetrapods (animals with four limbs) evolved out of a specific species of fish and began to transition from water to land, Your "fish stay (or don't stay) fish is just grossly dishonest., Why are you choosing to misrepresent evolution in this manner?But you don't believe fish stay as fish, do you. Laugh again -- I'll leave gorillas out of this now, I guess there's no "evidence" that they are evolving to -- whatever a gorilla might evolve to.
You really do not know that whatever you read in science publications is for sure really what and how it happened, such as the viewpoint you mention of scientists about the common ancestor of tetrapods.
not an answer to my question
that does seem to be the case
By the way, what is the evidence you speak of? How do you know that it is evidence of the common ancestor of tetrapods which you seem to believe evolved out of a specific form of fish and so forth. Have scientists found which specific form of fish it was?
Look again. Try to read more carefully. It is an answer to your question. Or it could be you don't see the answer right there. It's ok have a good one.
No, it's not "trolling," but wanting to find out from you, the "experts" what you really know as to how it all happened. At this point I'm not even speaking of "abiogenesis," which of course some scientists do say maybe the needed elements came from outer space...so maybe we go back to the beginning. What was the first lifeform scientists believe came to be on earth? Please do provide evidence of that. Thank you very much.
Your posts strongly indicate that you are only looking for things to nit pick in a sad attempt at justifying your beliefs.
When are you going to reveal the names of these scientists?
To what end?
I for one have no interest in your game pf pigeon chess.
well you start with the fossil record and then go to DNA and then comparative biology and so on and so on and so on
You completely ignored my question but if you want to pretend that you gave any sort of an answer I can't stop you.
already answered, you ignored it
Still nothing except conjecture as to what and how life came about from the start.
ok, thank you, and please forgive if I do not respond much any more to your lack-of-specifc-information posts. Thank you.
That's ok, thank you.
When are you going to reveal the names of these scientists?