YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
To begin with, the desert is a large place. That's to begin with.RE: Exodus
Mainly, the lack of any evidence of 2 million people in the desert for 40 years.
...
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
To begin with, the desert is a large place. That's to begin with.RE: Exodus
Mainly, the lack of any evidence of 2 million people in the desert for 40 years.
...
Your same state past is a fantasy.Your "former nature" is a fantasy.
Doubting the flood is delusional.The worldwide flood is a fantasy
. Whatever evidence is presented contradicting it you simply dismiss with a reorganization of history.
Science tailors evidence to it's beliefs. Then we get you doing apologetics for them.You're tailoring your apologetics to fit a preconceived religious doctrine.
I didmiss NO evidence ever. I dismiss your beliefs and wash them off the evidences that you have sullied.Your dismissing good, empirical evidence because it doesn't fit an account you consider axiomatic.
None have dated it. They have pepper sprayed it with their religious beliefs.Hundreds of geologists all over the word have seen it, analyzed it, measured it, dated it, &c. You've seen films of it yourself, on TV, surely?
Possibly associated with erupting founts of the deep (Yucatan) and the waters that both came from space and deep below the earth. I have not yet seen evidence that the direction of the impact was from above rather than from below. Have you any?First, the KT boundary is found around the world, associated with the gray thin layer associated with a huge meteor impact.
So what? A lot of sediment was laid down pre flood, as well as post flood. Additionally, a lot of plates got moved and things shoved around after the flood time (probably when the nature changed around the time of Babel).There are many sedimentary layers that cover vast regions of the world like limestones and salt, which cannot form in a world flood environment.
False! We EXPECT molten rock and volcanic activity as a result of continents moving rapidly in the former nature *and coming to a stop in this nature). One feature of the former nature is that no great heat was produced by friction and rocks.The vast amount of volcanic activity, and continental drift cannot possible occur in short period of time because the amount of energy involved violates the Laws of Thermodynamics, and if occured in a short period of time would melt the earth.
So do different nature in the past and the current present nature. Your religion has no monopoly on how we need to look at things.The natural processes we see at work in the earth explain the the evidence in the layers of the earth in the history of the earth.
There is absolutely no evidence that natural processes were different 10,000, 20,000, or 66 million years ago then the natural processes that are taking place today.
Sorry, I am not going to bring you up to speed on how ancient history indeed was resplendent with references of gods and spirits. If you doubt it and are too lazy to research it, too bad. I'll let the lurkers determine what is the truth of the issue.Another duck and dodge. You post nonsense and expect people to believe it. When they don't, you question their knowledge. Well, Mr. Dad, I admit it, I am ignorant of your make-believe history. Just as I am ignorant of the beliefs of any particular five year old who likes to make up stories.
No. Not actually.
Japanese Emperor Naruhito has a dinner date with the sun goddess - CNN
The ceremony dates back to around the 7th century, when it was created to reinforce the idea that the Emperor received his right to rule from the sun goddess. "If the Emperor claims descent from the sun goddess, then the stability of his reign is that much more secure," Breen said.
It was fantasy stuff 1400 years ago and it is fantasy stuff today. That you put any credence into it shows how far off the deep end you really are. It shows that you are ready to believe any silly stuff, even from Japanese religious beliefs.
Shortly after Constantine accepting Jesus, Rome's glory came to an end. Before Christianity, Rome had clean drinking water and sewage facilities. Within 100 years of Rome accepting Christianity, all that ended.
When was that an issue?When did you demonstrate that Adam existed and was created?
Pretty much. Biology is terminally ill.Oh okay, so you agree that evolution is the backbone of modern biology?
Why even bring Venice up? I am sorry but this is not just a poor argument, it is a rather stupid one since no point at alk can be made with it.Let's put aside dates for a moment. Venice is now being flooded. True, the water has not yet elevated to the tops of all the buildings, but excess water has an effect on land, and what is below the land.
Oh. And don't forget -- no organism besides humans make and put on clothing. Hermit crabs may look for shells and tin cans, but only humans for the most part learn how to make clothes. (Hermit crabs do not teach one another how to do that, although so far no hermit crab has spoken to me about it. And I hope he never does.)
Possibly associated with erupting founts of the deep (Yucatan) and the waters that both came from space and deep below the earth. I have not yet seen evidence that the direction of the impact was from above rather than from below. Have you any?
So what? A lot of sediment was laid down pre flood, as well as post flood. Additionally, a lot of plates got moved and things shoved around after the flood time (probably when the nature changed around the time of Babel).
False! We EXPECT molten rock and volcanic activity as a result of continents moving rapidly in the former nature *and coming to a stop in this nature). One feature of the former nature is that no great heat was produced by friction and rocks.
So do different nature in the past and the current present nature. Your religion has no monopoly on how we need to look at things.
There is absolutely no evidence that natural processes were the same 10,000, 20,000, or 66 million years ago (in your religious imaginary time) as the natural processes that are taking place today
Let's put aside dates for a moment. Venice is now being flooded. True, the water has not yet elevated to the tops of all the buildings, but excess water has an effect on land, and what is below the land.
Oh. And don't forget -- no organism besides humans make and put on clothing. Hermit crabs may look for shells and tin cans, but only humans for the most part learn how to make clothes. (Hermit crabs do not teach one another how to do that, although so far no hermit crab has spoken to me about it. And I hope he never does.)
As far as you're concerned, you know you're right and faith in God is wrong. It is certainly true that various species can have different traits. To be simple about it, birds can fly and raccoons do not. And other traits are considered instinctual. But again -- none of these earlier could or can develop reading and writing. The difference is vast in the thinking ability. (Covering that little percentage point, perhaps, difference between us and predecessors?)Why even bring Venice up? I am sorry but this is not just a poor argument, it is a rather stupid one since no point at alk can be made with it.
And please, no more special pleading involving man's intellect. Yes, we can learn more than other animals. So what?
You need something more than repeated failed arguments.
The point is that if enough water is dropped on the earth, topography changes, even those things that have been here for a long time. Animals do not leave history books or records of their lineage. To the best of my knowledge, they just live without wondering how they got there. Or where they're going, or why they die, and they don't teach (again, to the best of my knowledge) evolution or creation.I am not sure what your point is considering the topic of the thread. Venice? The problems of Venice are in part geography, human folly and global warming. Though some animals understand human language and communicate with humans like dogs and other primates.
I truly doubt an animal can understand what is read to him from, let's say, a newspaper. Or a written notice from the housing development.I am not sure what your point is considering the topic of the thread. Venice? The problems of Venice are in part geography, human folly and global warming. Though some animals understand human language and communicate with humans like dogs and other primates.
If there is something from the link you want to post do so. I saw nothing even relative.The research on the impact site is overwhelming that it was a huge meteorite and the thin gray layer all over the world there are small black silica balls called tektites associated with all meteorite impacts.
Chicxulub crater - Wikipedia details the evidence of the impact crater.
Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary - Wikipedia details the evidence of the thin gray layer containing the tectites that are the primary evidence for the meteorite impact associated with Chixulub crater.
How about if the innards of the planet gushed them up? Not a lot of time needed then.It is a physical matter of fact evidence that the vaste amount of Limestone, salt and gypsum can only be deposited over hundreds of thousands and millions of years. You cannot present any evidence that these deposits can be deposited in a short period of time.
You trying to apply them to a different nature is a dismal grasping at straws.Your knowledge of basic Newtonian physics, the Laws of Thermodynamics, and the amount of evidence of the amount of energy involved in the history of the earth is dismal and without scientific references to support your case.
Never said time was different here, and of course processes would be different if nature was! The issue you avoid is that you must prove a same nature existed if you want to use it's rules.You can look at the evidence all you want, but you have not provided any evidence that time and processes was different in the past.
There is over whelming evidence of no break in the sedimentary in sequences hundreds of years in length physical record over billions of years clearly demonstrated that there is no change i time nor natural processes over the history of the earth.
The vast ancient limestone, coal, gypsum, and salt deposits throughout the geologic strata around the world cannot form in a world flood scenario.
Please, no false accusations. Faith is your weakness, not mine. You keep using exceptionally poor arguments. They are based upon your lack of knowledge which all but guarantee that they fail. You don't try to use any arguments based upon what you know because you realize that these fail too.As far as you're concerned, you know you're right and faith in God is wrong. It is certainly true that various species can have different traits. To be simple about it, birds can fly and raccoons do not. And other traits are considered instinctual. But again -- none of these earlier could or can develop reading and writing. The difference is vast in the thinking ability. (Covering that little percentage point, perhaps, difference between us and predecessors?)
We can learn more than other animals although certainly there are unique distinctions. And developers can base projects on the attributes that animals have. When Animals Inspire Inventions | Innovation | Smithsonian
So...you present your evidence, but ignore mine? Got it.Half the population of Egypt suddenly leaves, with no sign or record of economic effects?
A couple million people live for forty years in a hot, sere desert, raising families, feeding their flocks, eating, drinking, pooping, burying their dead? How did they manage this?
Even more unbelievable, this massive population left no sign of ever existing, in a sun-baked desert, with low biologic turnover, that would desiccate/preserve pretty much anything organic?
Now that's a miracle!
Half the population of Egypt suddenly leaves, with no sign or record of economic effects?
LMFAO!! Oh thank you for the best laugh that I have had today. Nothing tells us more about the incompetence of literalists than the photographs of Ron Wyatt of recent materials from ships.So...you present your evidence, but ignore mine? Got it.
Actually, your evidence is lack of, which isn’t evidence.
But I’ll reply:
What was an ancient nomadic people (for only 40 years) supposed to leave behind, @Valjean ? Candy wrappers?
They didn’t build any structures...they lived in tents.
And the Bible highlights some miracles were involved: their clothing and sandals never wore out. (Deuteronomy 8:4) The manna was provided, but couldn’t even be saved for the next day.... except on the Sabbath.
And why are there chariot wheels at the bottom of the Red Sea?
Here's an interesting one, from National Geographic about the melting ice in Antarctica. It was nice to see the photos, gives me another picture of the world.Why even bring Venice up? I am sorry but this is not just a poor argument, it is a rather stupid one since no point at alk can be made with it.
And please, no more special pleading involving man's intellect. Yes, we can learn more than other animals. So what?
You need something more than repeated failed arguments.