So...you present your evidence, but ignore mine? Got it.
Actually, your evidence is lack of, which isn’t evidence.
Lack of evidence where evidence would be expected
is evidence.
But I’ll reply:
What was an ancient nomadic people (for only 40 years) supposed to leave behind,
@Valjean ? Candy wrappers?
Bones, mummified bodies, tools, household goods, coprolites, &c.
They didn’t build any structures...they lived in tents.
For 40 years? They remained nomadic?
Even so. deserts preserve -- tent poles, skins, &c. Then there is all the rest: bones, household goods, charcoal, &c.
We've found australopithicene fossils several million years old in northern Africa, from a time when they were a very rare species. A massive population of
Homo from <3,000 years ago would be expected to leave voluminous evidence.
And the Bible highlights some miracles were involved: their clothing and sandals never wore out. (Deuteronomy 8:4) The manna was provided, but couldn’t even be saved for the next day.... except on the Sabbath.
Exactly! Only an argument from magic could support the Exodus account.
And why are there chariot wheels at the bottom of the Red Sea?
LOL! I'm sure you'll find all sorts of human artifacts at the bottom of such an intensively navigated waterway.
Why would a fleeing people head East toward an impassable barrier? Were they that ignorant of geography?
The obvious route -- the only one out of Africa; away from Egyptian territory and into the middle East -- would be North, through the papyrus swamps ("sea of reeds") at the mouth of the Nile, and through what's now Palestine.