And with your own eyes and my own eyes and anyone's eyes, no one has ever witnessed a species evolve into another.
but they have seen it. And are still seeing and recording it.
So to say that a species evolved into another because a scientist said so is not proof. You are going off of heresay. It's no different than me saying that Allah exists because someone, somebody, or masses of people said that they saw him. It's heresay. It's not proof. How exactly do you know if they are telling the truth, especially if you yourself haven't seen it?
Because I can check their research... I can see the genetic tests that were done and if I wanted I could go and check it myself.
Even if someone here had the nerve to say that they actually watched a species evolve into something else right in front of their own eyes, you still couldn't prove it. How do I know if your telling the truth?
You would be able to look at my work and my evidence.... read what I did and where and for how long... and if you wanted you could replicate it yourself.
Scientists are very keen to look at one another's work and point out any flaws.
If you wanted, you could do what I did with bacteria and see with your own eyes. You don't have to trust me to tell the truth because you can test it.
Again, it does not mean that it did not happen, it just means that you can not prove that it happened. Do you get it? You may be a biologist. You say you are a biologist. But you can't prove it to me. I'm not saying that your not one, I'm just saying that right now, as we speak, you can't prove it to me or anyone else unless we actually SEE you in action.
I can in a way see where you are coming from.... but I should also point out that scientists never work alone... they work in pairs or teams of many many people. In many of these cases it isn't just one person saying what they saw but many. I did my experiment with bacteria with a team of four people and there were four other teams of four replicating it at the same time.
Then we also have the problem as to, if scientists claim that they have actually seen a species evolve into another, why the masses of people have not seen this form of evolution in the animals around them?
Most people don't know what to look for... Some of it requires genetic testing, something that the average person can't easily do on their own... A lot of it takes years of dedication out in the wild places of the world where average people don't go. Evolution can also take generations to track... which is why keeping good records is key.
If you want to learn what to look for and how to look for it, I would be glad to give you some pointers.
The masses have never seen a virus or an atom either... some things are harder to see than others.
Here we understand that Allah is the creator so all diversity was created by him. Originated by him. Then we are specifically told that in every one of Allah's creation is a Sign that let's us know how it was created.
And from everything I've seen the "how it was created" was through evolution... a truly awesome and magnificent method for him to use.
Therefore, if evolution was the cause, we all would be able to "SEE" it within any creation. That is not the case, therefore it is indeed a lie.
I honestly think that if you were to actually look, you would see it.
I don't know why you are so against evolution as the tool of Creator(Allah) to form life... I could guess, but that wouldn't entirely be fair to you... but I do know that something about evolution bothers you deeply, enough that you close your eyes to the evidence and IMHO to have made some confusing justifications for it.
wa:do