• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

EVOLUTION, what a lie.

Fatihah

Well-Known Member
So, as I said, since nothing in science is proven, you believe that it would be mentally disturbed to accept anything we learn from science as true, right?

Response: I'm not the one who is consistantly spitting out the absurd statement that science is not about proof and can't be proven, you are. You need to be answering your own question.
 

Jose Fly

Fisker of men
Response: It depends on what you mean. If by leading, you mean who created the most inventions, then no. But if we're talking about a case of who knows more in science, you can't pick a side. There's nothing the muslim world doesn't know scientifically that the rest of the world does and vice versa.
Where's your proof thats someone other than the Western world (and Japan) created "the most inventions"?

And as I said, U.S. scientists have far and away led the world in published scientific papers, both in terms of the number of papers and the number of times those papers were cited by others. In fact, it's not even close. U.S. scientists publish as much as the next three countries combined. CLICK HERE

So how about answering my question? Is it your view that the Muslim world leads the world in science?
 

Fatihah

Well-Known Member
So you believe that it's sensible to reject science. I see you're still using your Blackberry to do it, which of course is a result of that same scientific knowledge that you reject--because it's not proven.

Response: Your inability to comprehend is no fault of mine.
 

Fatihah

Well-Known Member
[QUOTE atotalstranger]I don't take advice from those who have no business giving it.(End quote)
Response: Likewise.
 

Fatihah

Well-Known Member
[QUOTE mball1297]And? The fact that some Muslims believe in the Quran and accept evolution is proof that the two arecompatible, and that it's only your interpretation of the one that stops you from accepting the other. That was my whole point.(End Quote)

Response: Which is pointless because ToE is not in the qur'an nor can you show otherwise.
 

Autodidact

Intentionally Blank
It's pretty obvious that the Western world (specifically the U.S., although one could add the Japanese in there as well, and they are a very secular society) has been the world's leader in science for some time. This is demonstrated by our extensive space exploration program, plus the fact that just about all of our modern technologies (computers, cell phones, blackberries, HDTV's, etc.) were all invented either here or in Japan. Just about all the modern medical advancements have taken place in the West (vaccines for diseases, treatments, surgical advancements, organ transplants). Students come from all over the world to attend U.S. universities and study science. The most famous "celebrity scientists", e.g. Stephen Hawking, S.J. Gould, Richard Dawkins, Jacques Cousteau, Jane Goodall, Carl Sagan, etc. are all Westerners.

Now, how about answering my question? Is it your view that the Muslim world leads the modern world in science?

Two Muslims have won Nobel science prizes, Abdus Salam and Ahmed Zewail. Around 1 in 5 people around the world is Muslim.

100 Jews have won Nobel science prizes. Fewer than 1 of 100 people are Jewish.
 

Autodidact

Intentionally Blank
Response: Your inability to comprehend is no fault of mine.

All of science is based on evidence, and none on proof.
You do not believe anything based on evidence rather than proof.
Therefore you do not believe anything in science.

Simple logic.

ETA: btw, Fatihah, the above is what is known in logic as a proof. The conclusion, Fatihah does not believe science, has now been formally proven.
 
Last edited:

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
Response: Which is pointless because ToE is not in the qur'an nor can you show otherwise.

I guess when faced with proof, logic and reason, all you're left with is moving the goalposts, huh?

Fact: Some Muslims accept evolution while still believing fully in the Quran.

Therefore evolution doesn't contradict the Quran, just your interpretation of it. Others who have a different interpretation have no problem with it.
 

Fatihah

Well-Known Member
[QUOTE Jose Fly]Where's your proof thats someone other than the Western world (and Japan) created "the most inventions"?(End quote)

Response: I never said they didn't make the most inventions. You must've misread.

(Quote JoseFly)
And as I said, U.S. scientists have far and away led the world in published scientific papers, both in terms of the number of papers and the number of times those papers were cited by others. In fact, it's not even close. U.S. scientists publish as much as the next three countries combined. CLICK HERE

So how about answering my question? Is it your view that the Muslim world leads the world in science?[/QUOTE]

Response: I answered this already in post 1941 but to add more, you're comparing two different lifestyles and mindstates as well. It's not a case of the muslim world being less inventive, it's the simple facts that we're muslims. We don't care for the material world like the rest of the world. Your world is different. Right now the western inventors is thinking of ways to create something even more spectacular and creative. Muslims on the other hand don't care. It's practically haram. (Unlawful). The more money I make, the more I give to the poor, not on some new invention. So you're not beating the muslim world in anything. You just happen to thrive on something that is meaningless to us.
 

painted wolf

Grey Muzzle
The agricultural revolution that feeds millions is meaningless?
Clean drinking water and the end of cholera is meaningless?
Antibiotics are meaningless?

Am I missing something or are we having fun with the definition of meaningless now?

wa:do
 

Kilgore Trout

Misanthropic Humanist
The agricultural revolution that feeds millions is meaningless?
Clean drinking water and the end of cholera is meaningless?
Antibiotics are meaningless?

Am I missing something or are we having fun with the definition of meaningless now?

wa:do

Can't really argue with someone who admits that progress is meaningless to them. Particularly, when the evidence bears this fact out.
 

Breathe

Hostis humani generis
We don't care for the material world like the rest of the world. ... Muslims on the other hand don't care. It's practically haram. (Unlawful). So you're not beating the muslim world in anything. You just happen to thrive on something that is meaningless to us.

Isn't that just an excuse for being uninventive? I find it ironic you say that, when at one point Islam was leading the way with science, and now how some of its followers are trying to keep their section of the world in the Dark Ages.

With new, future technology that you seem to despise, you can eradicate diseases, poverty and famine, you can find a cure for cancer, for heart attacks, heal those with strokes, let the blind see.

Without these evil haram scientists finding this out, these things will never be cured - to fix these, research into biology, genetics and evolution will be required. To claim that the injustice that is on the world is solely God's will and not the work of the wicked and the selfish is insulting to God. Ironically, you seem to think that these very people who are attempting to cure the world of its injustice will be Jahannami (residents of Hell) is awful.

Yes, we can wait for God to fix all the ills and injustices on Earth, but the chances are it will be quicker for us to do it. None of us humans know when Yawm al-Qimaya (the Day of Resurrection) will happen, nor when Jesus will return to Earth. Today where I am, it is Rajab 14, 1430. That means it's been 1430 years since the Hijra. It's been 1377 years since Muhammad passed on, and Yawm al-Qiyama has yet to happen. What if it is not God's will for Yawm al-Qiyama for another 1,000, or 2,000, or 10,000 years?

That's all going a bit off topic though. :rainbow1: Bringing it back to topic, what do you believe about those Muslims who hold the view of evolution? Why do they accept it and you not? (Are they kufr in your eyes because they accept this?)
 

Fatihah

Well-Known Member
[QUOTE Odion]Isn't that just an excuse for being uninventive?(End Quote)

Response: No. Why would it be?

(Quote Odion)
I find it ironic you say that, when at one point Islam was leading the way with science, and now how some of its followers are trying to keep their section of the world in the Dark Ages.(End Quote)

Response: There's nothing the rest of the world can do scientifically that the muslim world can't do. So where's the irony?

(Quote Odion)
With new, future technology that you seem to despise, you can eradicate diseases, poverty and famine, you can find a cure for cancer, for heart attacks, heal those with strokes, let the blind see.

Without these evil haram scientists finding this out, these things will never be cured - to fix these, research into biology, genetics and evolution will be required. To claim that the injustice that is on the world is solely God's will and not the work of the wicked and the selfish is insulting to God. Ironically, you seem to think that these very people who are attempting to cure the world of its injustice will be Jahannami (residents of Hell) is awful.

Yes, we can wait for God to fix all the ills and injustices on Earth, but the chances are it will be quicker for us to do it. None of us humans know when Yawm al-Qimaya (the Day of Resurrection) will happen, nor when Jesus will return to Earth. Today where I am, it is Rajab 14, 1430. That means it's been 1430 years since the Hijra. It's been 1377 years since Muhammad passed on, and Yawm al-Qiyama has yet to happen. What if it is not God's will for Yawm al-Qiyama for another 1,000, or 2,000, or 10,000 years?

That's all going a bit off topic though. :rainbow1: Bringing it back to topic, what do you believe about those Muslims who hold the view of evolution? Why do they accept it and you not? (Are they kufr in your eyes because they accept this?)(End quote)

Response: I don't get the point of half your post but as far as evolution is concerned with other muslims, you have to ask those muslims.
 

Breathe

Hostis humani generis
Response: No. Why would it be?
Because you "don't care".
Response: There's nothing the rest of the world can do scientifically that the muslim world can't do. So where's the irony?
That the Islamic world was the pinnacle of scientific advancement in the Western world, and now it's being held back.

Response: I don't get the point of half your post but as far as evolution is concerned with other muslims, you have to ask those muslims.
The point is, science is a good thing. To hold it back because you're expecting God to intervene all the time is unfair. I asked you about whether or not you think Muslims who hold this belief are kufr or not because you seem to act as though believing in evolution is an insult to God.
 

Jose Fly

Fisker of men
Response: I answered this already in post 1941 but to add more, you're comparing two different lifestyles and mindstates as well. It's not a case of the muslim world being less inventive, it's the simple facts that we're muslims. We don't care for the material world like the rest of the world. Your world is different. Right now the western inventors is thinking of ways to create something even more spectacular and creative. Muslims on the other hand don't care. It's practically haram. (Unlawful). The more money I make, the more I give to the poor, not on some new invention. So you're not beating the muslim world in anything. You just happen to thrive on something that is meaningless to us.
Thanks for that answer Fatihah. I think that's probably one of the most honest responses you've given in this thread.
 

Fatihah

Well-Known Member
[QUOTE Odion]

That the Islamic world was the pinnacle of scientific advancement in the Western world, and now it's being held back.(End Quote)

Response: In what way?

(Quote Odion)
The point is, science is a good thing. To hold it back because you're expecting God to intervene all the time is unfair.(End Quote)

Response: How so and who's holding science back? In fact, how exactly does someone hold science back?

(Quote Odion)
I asked you about whether or not you think Muslims who hold this belief are kufr or not because you seem to act as though believing in evolution is an insult to God.(End Quote)

Response: How does one act like believing in evolution is an insult to God?
 
Top